Big Dakota
New Member
- Messages
- 11,876
- Reaction score
- 0
I wouldn't.Alexander;3026748 said:I highly doubt anyone would trade much for Roy Williams right about now.
I wouldn't.Alexander;3026748 said:I highly doubt anyone would trade much for Roy Williams right about now.
wileedog;3026731 said:I think Jerry actually does a decent job on draft day when he does his inevitable jockeying up and down the boards.
But other then Terry Glenn for a 6th, or the push that was the Galloway/Keyshawn trade, I can't think of many non-draft day trades Jerry has made that have "favored us," much less evened out the truly dreadful ones.
Alexander;3026748 said:I highly doubt anyone would trade much for Roy Williams right about now.
Alexander;3026736 said:Ware is pretty established and I don't believe anyone would be brazen enough to bother asking to trade for him as it is certain we wouldn't give him up no matter what.
Given the fact that teams like the Ravens need CBs and WRs, I would assume someone like Austin or Scandrick. Most of the trade rumor buzz that didn't happen circled around the WR position from what I read.
I would certainly hope we didn't turn down anything significant for any other "young talent".
sonnyboy;3026761 said:Guess you missed that Herschel Walker deal. It was in all the papers.
You're kidding right?panchucko;3026767 said:Josh Cribbs for Cowboys' 2010 first-round pick, a third-round pick and sixth-round pick. The Cowboys get Cleveland's 2010 seventh-round pick in the Cribbs trade
i agree with that, but also could have been scandrick or john philips 3rd string TE, or victor butlerCowboyMike;3026732 said:I stand corrected. From another blog entry about the jerry press conference:
I'm betting it was Austin or Bennett.
wileedog;3026766 said:I was thinking more in the Jerry Jones Makes All Of The Decisions Era, but ok I'll give you that one deal 20 years ago.
Jerry Jones' ability to estimate the magnitude of draft choices should be what throws you off. He gave up two premium choices for Roy Williams and rationalizes it. For all we know, he could take another choice and talk it up, especially if he can grin and think he's holding onto a young player that someone else might want.tyke1doe;3026764 said:Scandrick sounds plausible, but the "major" trade throws me off. Would Scandrick be involved in a "major" trade? By "major" I'm thinking a first round pick and maybe a player. A first round pick alone is not a "major" trade, IMO.
But I can't see a team offering a first round pick for Scandrick.
Of course i am, Jerry would never give up the same picks 2 years in a rowAmishCowboy;3026769 said:You're kidding right?
He hooked you then. Say what you want about him, but he's a marketing genius.tayloner182;3026776 said:This is going to absolutely kill me until Jerry just comes out and says what the trade was. I HATE not knowing stuff like this.
Monster Heel;3026749 said:If it was Bennett, they should've traded him.
You mean we should consider ourselves sucked?Alexander;3026777 said:He hooked you then. Say what you want about him, but he's a marketing genius.
sonnyboy;3026771 said:I think you mean the Jerry makes only the bad decisions Era. That started in 1989.
It's easier to work with and better fits anyone's Jerry hating agenda.