DMN Blog: Expect the 'Boys best effort this week/Amendola's time coming to an end

[tomson75]

Lol -

My grasp of the obvious is outstanding here. For weeks been saying Amendola had nill to no chance to make our 53.

LOL...I'm going to go make fun of ******** kids by calling them Nors. No, actually, I'm not...they deserve much better.

 

[iceberg]

Zrin - quick to cheap attacks and avoid football issue's. You can't win here on merit and YOU know it - LOL

Amendola is a fringe UDFA wide receiver that likely never amounts to anything in the NFL. Shame on me for calling that out. Back to regular programming.

who said he was trying to win anything? he was just calling you an attention *****. and you know it. : )

 

[Alexander]

Race has little to do with it.

I don't care if he was black, green, red, or yellow, what he has demonstrated so far is not favorable to his case for making the team. He still has a couple of preseason games but I put his chances at 80/20 of not making it based solely on what I saw in the two aforementioned games.

Actually, race has alot to do with it.

As a little Caucasian receiver, he is going to get the underdog label.

That contributes a great deal to his almost cult-like following.

 

[Alexander]

Did Carp do anything in Denver? I wasn't paying attention.

You would really have had to pay attention to notice him if that answers your question.

 

[Alexander]

He has. Re-watch the games. He was consistently open given the few opportunities that he had...which were few. Bartel just never found him.

What game were you watching?

I'd really like your ultrawide coaches-tape view of the field that tells you this.

9 times out of 10, we can't tell who is "wide open" until it is pointed out after the fact.

So please explain how he was "consistently open" in his few opportunities.

And I am not talking about the play where the radio announcers stated he was open "in the endzone for a touchdown". He wasn't there either.

 

[tomson75]

What game were you watching?

I'd really like your ultrawide coaches-tape view of the field that tells you this.

9 times out of 10, we can't tell who is "wide open" until it is pointed out after the fact.

So please explain how he was "consistently open" in his few opportunities.

And I am not talking about the play where the radio announcers stated he was open "in the endzone for a touchdown". He wasn't there either.

Typical Alexander mushmouth argument. Exchanging 'getting separation' for 'wide open' is something similar to what advertising ****** have used for years. You're no different.

Watch the game before yo talk ish. I've got you're play by play on hand for you anytime you actually want to go through it. Fact is, when he's visible, he open more often than not...even if its only five or six views. Get over your hate. It a weak attribute.

...and actually, he was 'WIDE OPEN' when the announcers said that. You're as blind as your persona suggests.

 

[Alexander]

Typical Alexander mushmouth argument. Exchanging 'getting separation' for 'wide open' is something similar to what advertising ****** have used for years. You're no different.

Um, what?

Watch the game before yo talk ish.

I did. Apparently, you didn't. Players that are wide open so much tend to have more than one catch. But perhaps that is just my clouded perception that lacks the super-duper tape you have that shows him getting open so much.

I've got you're play by play on hand for you anytime you actually want to go through it.

I have it too.

He caught one pass.

He was also a reason why we lost the game when he didn't run a crisp route on the Jack Williams interception. But feel free to blame Lowber like the announcers did, incorrectly I might add.

Fact is, when he's visible, he open more often than not...even if its only five or six views. Get over your hate. It a weak attribute.

There is no "hate".

I love this incredibly weak labelling that results when someone asks for results, it is characterized as "hate".

I could care less about Danny Amendola enough to hate him. He's not important enough to hate until he actually makes the team. I have a very nasty habit of demanding results and relying less on dreaming.

If I "hate" anyone, it would be imbeciles who can't have a debate without resorting to primitive slang when they really have nothing else.

I am really a "hater" though.

I'd like to see more than one actual professional catch. That fuels my hatred.

I must just need your guidence to understanding this player's brilliance.

I should just be satisfied with your word that "when hes visable, he open more often than not".:laugh2:

...and actually, he was 'WIDE OPEN' when the announcers said that. You're as blind as your persona suggests.

No, he was not "wide open". The announcers are no different than people like you.

They are pulling for him. So they allow their heartstrings to get in the way.

 

[tomson75]

Um, what?



I did. Apparently, you didn't. Players that are wide open so much tend to have more than one catch. But perhaps that is just my clouded perception that lacks the super-duper tape you have that shows him getting open so much.



I have it too.

He caught one pass.

He was also a reason why we lost the game when he didn't run a crisp route on the Jack Williams interception. But feel free to blame Lowber like the announcers did, incorrectly I might add.


There is no "hate".

I love this incredibly weak labelling that results when someone asks for results, it is characterized as "hate".

I could care less about Danny Amendola enough to hate him. He's not important enough to hate until he actually makes the team. I have a very nasty habit of demanding results and relying less on dreaming.

If I "hate" anyone, it would be imbeciles who can't have a debate without resorting to primitive slang when they really have nothing else.

I am really a "hater" though.

I'd like to see more than one actual professional catch. That fuels my hatred.

I must just need your guidence to understanding this player's brilliance.

I should just be satisfied with your word that "when hes visable, he open more often than not".:laugh2:



No, he was not "wide open". The announcers are no different than people like you.

They are pulling for him. So they allow their heartstrings to get in the way.

You fail miserably. Again.

 

[Alexander]

You fail miserably. Again.

Is that the best retort you have? I should have figured.