DMN Blog: Jerry Jones can't fault Alan Ball

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
I wish Hamlin would have just blasted that WR a few plays later. I didn't even care at that point, I just wanted blood.
 

Use Your Illusion

New Member
Messages
586
Reaction score
0
I can't believe Jerry actually referenced himself COACHING. Unbelievable.

My desire to watch this bozo crash and burn almost tops my desire to see the Cowboys succeed.
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,140
Reaction score
27,231
So a defender can go head hunting on Romo and there is no flag, but Ball hits with his shoulder to the receiver's shoulder and it is a foul???

Did the refs have some money on the game, serious question???
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
Beast_from_East;3010235 said:
Did the refs have some money on the game, serious question???

When its as bad and as blatant as yesterday, its a serious question that needs to be addressed. Nobody thought NBA officials would ever be involved with gambling either, and we know how that played out.

I think the line was 9 or 9 1/2 yesterday. I'd say they had at least a 10-14 point effect on the game, easily.

I still never saw what Kosier did to draw a holding penalty to wipe out MBIII's big run to set up 1st and goal. Witten absolutely went balistic on the officials regarding Miles Austin illegal formation penalty, and you could see Austin clearly wondering what he did. Newman did basically the same thing we saw Champ Bailey do last week, yet he drew a flag and Bailey didnt. Ball's call was total crap. It is inexplicable how the refs (particularly the guy who basically ONLY looks for two things, holding and roughing the QB) could watch that play on Romo and not throw a flag. There were a couple others as well.

Its truly sickening.
 

Bleu Star

Bye Felicia!
Messages
33,925
Reaction score
19,920
I LOL'd in disbelief at how the league is becoming more and more like the marshmallow man that coaches our team. There was a Chiefs fan sitting a few feet away from me watching the same big screen. I expressed my belief (rather loudly) that it was a bull**** call and he quickly agreed with me. It was universally known to have been utter bull****.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
Borderline teams are influenced by "bad officiating". Poor ticky tack calls can and will influence games if you put yourselves in positions with small margins for error.

The bigger concern out of this blog entry would be our General Manager suggesting he has a single solitary thing to do with coaching these types of mistakes (and yes, Ball made a mistake) out of our players. It is a problem if Jones, either by will or by necessity, has to "coach" any player about their behavior. That is the coach's job. If he cannot allow himself to stay out of it, then he needs to officially put the cap and whistle on to avoid confusion. All it does is send the wrong message to players and makes an already weak staff even weaker.

That, and not the incessant bleating about unfair officiating should be all that anyone should take out of it.
 

Bach

Benched
Messages
7,645
Reaction score
0
Alexander;3010346 said:
The bigger concern out of this blog entry would be our General Manager suggesting he has a single solitary thing to do with coaching these types of mistakes ... All it does is send the wrong message to players and makes an already weak staff even weaker.

That seems to be Jerry's specialty.
 

Temo

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,946
Reaction score
362
It was not a bad call. By the letter of the rule, it is the correct call. New rule this year.

The text reads:

"[Unnecessary roughness includes] … if the initial force of the contact by a defender’s helmet, forearm, or shoulder is to the head or neck area of a defenseless receiver who is catching or attempting to catch a pass."

http://quirkyresearch.blogspot.com/search?q=nfl+rule+book
 

newlander

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,205
Reaction score
123
I started watching Cowboys games and the NFL in 1977 at age 8. I can NEVER remember the number of bad calls that happen now. But I do have a theory: NO, I don't think the "fix is in" and Las Vegas is controlling things. (although I can certainly see why other people would speculate that is happening)What I've noticed the last couple years in the league is a concerted effort to keep the game close: period. Why do you think so many games go down to the last play now? That use to be pretty rare. They make every call with the intention of keeping it as close as possible so the TV sets stay on, the commercials are viewed, and the ratings stay high. I know a few of you will be disgusted by the possibility of the NFL being a party to this but I really believe it. LOTS of games these days go down to the wire because the zebras make sure they do. It's all great drama. But I'll also say this....you want to see bad officiating? Watch college football.........unreal.



PS: as for JJ...what more can be said that hasn't been already in this thread? He's a narcissistic billionaire egomaniac. Other than that a great guy.....................
 

TwentyOne

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,663
Reaction score
5,313
WV Cowboy;3008283 said:
My wife and I were in a sports ball, ... couldn't hear a thing.

Why was that a penalty?

I thought it was a great defensive play.
They explained it. The rule doesn't say you can't hit the WR with your helmet to his helmet. The rules says: you can't hit a defensless WR to his helmet regardless(!) with which part of your body.

They changed the rule this season.

Ball hit him with his shoulderpad against his helmet. So accourding to the explanation it was a penalty.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
TwentyOne;3010406 said:
They explained it. The rule doesn't say you can't hit the WR with your helmet to his helmet. The rules says: you can't hit a defensless WR to his helmet regardless(!) with which part of your body.

They changed the rule this season.

Ball hit him with his shoulderpad against his helmet. So accourding to the explanation it was a penalty.

To me it looked as if Ball put his shoulder on the upper chest plate of the WR not the head. No doubt the WR head snapped back but that happens when your forward progress coming to an abrupt stop. I felt it was a close call but did not think he hit the WR in the head
 

BALCO

Member
Messages
119
Reaction score
1
HowAboutThemCowboys;3010341 said:
Wasn't there a horse collar tackle missed on Austin on a sideline play too?

The officiating for the most part was inept. How they don't call a horse collar tackle is beyond me...couldn't of been more obvious. Also the helmet to helmet on Romo non-call was horse poo. You don't think Brady would of gotten that call?
 

Seven

Messenger to the football Gods
Messages
19,301
Reaction score
9,892
Cover 2;3008309 said:
That interpretation of the rule is (as Charles Barkley would say) "turrible." The rules committee is slowly eroding away what makes football such a great game.

True enough.


Every year in the beginnig of the season it seems the calls are often and questionable. I'll give them knocking off the rust and possibly setting the tone for a season of officiating but.................there is still no consistency. Something that has needed addressed for years now.

Let the guys play football. I find nothing worse than an officiating crew that dictates the game and the possible outcome. See the Stealer/ Seahags Super Bowl.
 
Top