MarionBarberThe4th
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 17,682
- Reaction score
- 5,649
TO
Glenn
Crayton
Austin
Stanback
Amendola
Have you heard of Hurd?
TO
Glenn
Crayton
Austin
Stanback
Amendola
MarionBarberThe4th;2115069 said:Habe you heard of Hurd?
I doubt he makes the team. He's just too limited. He's probably as good as he'll ever be right now and that's just not good enough.MarionBarberThe4th;2115069 said:Have you heard of Hurd?
burmafrd;2115070 said:Running routes and hands. Routes can be learned but hands....
He has never shown the ability to consistently catch the ball. Sure he makes flashy catches like the one in the OTA. BUT for a WR first above all else you have to catch the ball. And while Rice did have a case of the dropsies his first couple of years, he had shown in college very good hands. Austin never has. And I seriously doubt that he ever will.
"Hands" is a technique like anything else that can certainly be taught.burmafrd;2115070 said:Running routes and hands. Routes can be learned but hands....
He has never shown the ability to consistently catch the ball. Sure he makes flashy catches like the one in the OTA. BUT for a WR first above all else you have to catch the ball. And while Rice did have a case of the dropsies his first couple of years, he had shown in college very good hands. Austin never has. And I seriously doubt that he ever will.
It's much more than those two catches. In fact, I don't even remember them, and I had (and others had) formed that opinion before those catches. He's consistently looked awkward since he first arrived.FuzzyLumpkins;2115073 said:Its technique and repetitions just like anything else. And his hands 'problem' is pretty much all being based on two passes in the Commanders game.
This may be a case of small sample size and i wager that it is.
theogt;2115078 said:"Hands" is a technique like anything else that can certainly be taught.
It's much more than those two catches. In fact, I don't even remember them, and I had (and others had) formed that opinion before those catches. He's consistently looked awkward since he first arrived.
I doubt he makes the team. He's just too limited. He's probably as good as he'll ever be right now and that's just not good enough.
I'd keep Amendola over Hurd just based on potential alone.
Here's me discussing it in September.FuzzyLumpkins;2115082 said:I really don't remember it being an issue in the preseason but i do remember the Commanders game. He was WIDE OPEN too.
theogt;2115091 said:
I know. Just looked it up for S&G.FuzzyLumpkins;2115101 said:Im not disagreeing with your observation brah.
theogt;2115091 said:
DallasFanSince86;2114843 said:I could watch that all day.:laugh2:
The difference between Crayton and Hurd is that Crayton has an uncanny ability of finding a way to get open despite his lack of athleticism.Bob Sacamano;2115107 said:know what's funny about that post? it reminds me of the Patrick Crayton/Terrence Copper debates on here, idk if you were here for those, or remember them
many wanted Copper instead because they felt that the 4.6 Crayton reached his ceiling and wasn't "athletic" enough, Copper was the athletic type who ran a 4.47, and sure enough...
I wouldn't be suprised to see Hurd return as the #4 receiver, assuming Glenn comes back, if not, he'll be #3 JMO
theogt;2115118 said:The difference between Crayton and Hurd is that Crayton has an uncanny ability of finding a way to get open despite his lack of athleticism.
Just don't see it from Hurd.
Either way, we've got Crayton. We don't need another one. We need someone that can be a deep threat and a solid #2.Bob Sacamano;2115120 said:I think playing QB helped Crayton get it how fast he did
Hurd is entering his 3rd year, so time will tell, this is the year for both Hurd and Austin to do something
theogt;2115127 said:Either way, we've got Crayton. We don't need another one. We need someone that can be a deep threat and a solid #2.