DMN Blog: Sam Hurd has a high ankle sprain

Bluefin

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,209
Reaction score
9,677
Receiver Survival
Eatman: Injuries Forcing Cowboys To Keep Both WR's


Nick Eatman - Email
DallasCowboys.com Staff Writer
August 29, 2008 12:25 AM


IRVING, Texas - With preseason finales, you have to find the game within the game.

You can't just sit back, watch the two teams battle and call it a day. No one cares about final scores of preseason games, especially the last one.

So you have to look deeper.

And heading into this game, the most significant competition that I saw wasn't exactly the Cowboys and Vikings.

And no, the storyline certainly wasn't the Cowboys winning 16-10 in what will be the final preseason game in Texas Stadium history.

Nope, the real battle of this night was between a pair of teammates.

Danny Amendola and Mike Jefferson.

That was the story going into this game: Which of these one-time long shots at receiver would step up the most and grab that dangling roster spot at the end of the wide receiver position.

Despite neither one of them lighting up the stat book, could it be that they both end up making this team?

They just might have to.

That's because that injury bug that has been dancing around the wide receiver corp took another big bite here Thursday night. Just like that, Sam Hurd, who wasn't supposed to play more than a handful of snaps anyway, suffers a high-ankle sprain while running a first-quarter reverse.

Amazing. The Cowboys entered training camp with five surefire locks to make the team at wide receiver. And with the regular season now nearly a week away, three of them are hurt. It's likely all three will be out for the Sept. 7 opener in Cleveland, definitely two of them.

Miles Austin has at least three more weeks to go with his sprained MCL injury. Isaiah Stanback will be iffy to return next week with his re-injured shoulder. And now Hurd's high-ankle sprain, that needs to be re-evaluated on Friday, could keep him out a while, too. Traditionally, those high-ankle sprains are much nastier than they sound. It could keep him out maybe a month, but could also linger even longer.

So now what? Panic button time? Maybe.

Jerry Jones says not so fast.

The Cowboys owner gave an emphatic "no" when asked if he needed to go sign another receiver.

"That's part of the game . . . injuries," Jones said. "You hate to see it happen again right before the season. Sam was playing well for us. The key that you potentially lose is a player that Tony (Romo) has been throwing to and working with. My biggest concern is going into the first game and not having players that are familiar with Tony."

But there's always some silver lining in this. Not trying to go glass half-full here, but forgive me if I refuse to call this position snake-bitten just yet. Not snake, but bug-bitten.

Let's be honest here. We all know it could be worse when it comes to wide receiver injuries. Getting Patrick Crayton hurt or should I dare say . . . Ok, I won't. You know who I mean.

Sure, losing three of your top five wide receivers in the preseason is tough, but it's workable. The question is, how?

Paging Terry Glenn? Jerry Jones was asked that very question and it was a rather ambiguous answer that came from the owner's mouth in the locker room after Thursday's game.

It wasn't a yes. But, it wasn't a no either.

"I don't know that one way or another," Jones said of Glenn, who was released right before the start of training camp. "I don't have a status on Terry's condition. I am not saying anything other than I don't know that Terry is ready to play. But I don't know he's not. I just don't know."

When asked if he will call Glenn or his agent in the near future, Jones held his cards close.

"I don't know. I am going to keep that to myself."

Interesting. He said no to a veteran receiver, but he didn't say no to Terry Glenn.

It seems the deciding factor here is the receiver's comfort with Romo. Jones couldn't stress that enough when he spoke to reporters.

That means, don't be so quick to look at all the roster cuts come Saturday and get all excited about some wide receiver we heard about in college. It happened the other day when Denver cut Taylor Jacobs. Ok, he's a name.

But that doesn't mean he, or any other released receiver, can step right in and be better than what they've got.

And let's get back to just that - what they've got.

Because of injuries, the Cowboys not only have Amendola and Jefferson, but they might have to play them both in Cleveland.

Let that digest a bit. One more time for emphasis.

Two players who were definitely on the outside looking in about four weeks ago, not only have the inside track to make the 53-man roster, but they very well could be donning those blue jerseys in the Dawg Pound on Sept. 7 as part of the 45-man game-day roster.

Wow.

Even Amendola says he's a bit surprised at his current situation.

"Coming into the NFL as an undrafted free agent, I wasn't sure if I could play at this level," the former Texas Tech standout said. "Now, I think I can. When it's all said and done, and camp is over, I think I can play at this level."

Of course, Amendola can only hope that Jerry Jones is in agreement with that.

But he might not have a choice. Just like with Jefferson, who admitted after the game that he was a little winded after playing the whole game.

"Man, I haven't done that in a while, couple years," said Jefferson, who spent last season on the Cowboys' practice squad. "I don't know what's going to happen. The thing is, I can't control it. I can just worry about myself. Going out there, lining up right, running the right routes and catching the ball. That's all I could do."

Jefferson led the team with three catches for 36 yards. Nothing too exciting. Amendola's night of two catches for 17 yards, along with four kick returns for 36 yards wasn't much better.

But in this preseason, and this situation, it doesn't come down to what Jefferson or Amendola did. It's what they didn't do.

And they didn't get hurt.

That alone might just be their ticket to the 53-man roster.
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,173
Reaction score
27,245
Spectre;2219361 said:
better move Bennett out wide.
otherwise, this is why you don't draft a TE in the 2nd round when you have a probowler there but NO receiver depth.

There was really no receiver in the 2nd round any better than what we already had on the team.

Need and availability do not always coincide, you dont just draft a receiver in the 2nd because you need one if a player higher on your board is still available.

I think it is commonly referred to as drafting best player available on your board. Now this is not to say I dont have my doubts about Bennett, but I dont have a problem with the logic used to draft Bennett.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
Julius said when he got his sprain in 2005 that in the end he would have recovered faster with a break. Hurd is not the fastest or quickest guy in the world to begin with; so this could be keeping him back for a month or maybe 2.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
Spectre;2219361 said:
better move Bennett out wide.
otherwise, this is why you don't draft a TE in the 2nd round when you have a probowler there but NO receiver depth.

You can't predict injuries. If we had drafted a wide receiver, they'd have gone to camp no better than fifth on the depth chart (and at the time of the draft, there was a chance that Terry Glenn would return and push them to sixth).

And if we HAD drafted a wide receiver, it could have been Jason Witten spraining an ankle. Then we'd have Tony Curtis and Rodney Hannah as our only tight ends for the first three games or so.
 

Spectre

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,748
Reaction score
522
Beast_from_East;2219416 said:
There was really no receiver in the 2nd round any better than what we already had on the team.

Need and availability do not always coincide, you dont just draft a receiver in the 2nd because you need one if a player higher on your board is still available.

I think it is commonly referred to as drafting best player available on your board. Now this is not to say I dont have my doubts about Bennett, but I dont have a problem with the logic used to draft Bennett.
Would we have taken a QB if he were the "best player available"?

No.
Because we don't need one.

Need plays a significant role in drafting, like it or not.
 

LandryFan

Proud Native Texan, USMC-1972-79, USN-1983-2000
Messages
7,400
Reaction score
6,347
Pick6TerenceNewman;2219052 said:
Not at all, cuz, just know that you need experience behind your starters. If one of them go down, Jerry Jones may have to start playing.

That's just what Wade was doing...getting Hurd some experience....never mind....
 

Common Sense

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,897
Reaction score
2,048
I'm sorry, but the "no good receivers available" argument just doesn't hold water. Not a year goes by with NO serviceable WRs to be found in an entire draft. The Boys had their pick of any WR in the draft more than once. Maybe they didn't have a first round grade on anyone -- so what? That's what the scouting department gets paid for. Besides, we've already seen how wrong they've been proven with how some of the rookie receivers are performing with the teams that actually had the balls to pick them up.

Sure, you can say hindsight is 20/20, but honestly, what makes more sense right now... drafting someone like Jackson or Hardy... or unearthing your third-string tight end in the second? You can't spin that one.
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
Spectre;2219361 said:
better move Bennett out wide.
otherwise, this is why you don't draft a TE in the 2nd round when you have a probowler there but NO receiver depth.

How much depth did you expect to have at the receiver position? There are 3 receivers that have been injured that were expected to be on the team with 2 of them expecting to contribute. That is just bad luck. It is not as if Dallas lost only one guy to injury and are scrambling around trying to figure out what to do. Three at the same position is a lot for any team. Few teams have depth to deal with 3 wide receiver injuries at one time. Many teams don't even carry more than 5 receivers on the roster. In the early 90s when Dallas was winning Superbowls, they had 4 receivers on the roster and the 4th guy rarely saw the field.
 

David276

Benched
Messages
950
Reaction score
0
sucks, suffered a bad high ankle sprain about 3/ weeks ago . i have no idea how TO was able to get back and play that hurt like sfhgdfg. i still can barely walk .
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
So are we in full blown panic mode, yet, or are we saving that for when Todd Lowber jams his finger in practice?

Personally, I really don't think this is a big deal. Hurd and Austin will be back. Until then, Romo will just have to make do throwing to Witten, Owens, Jones, Barber, Crayton, Bennett and Curtis. I think he can manage.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
I guess we wait and see. The severity of the injury will determine how quick or how long it will be before Hurd returns.
 

juck

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,246
Reaction score
244
After reading 7 pages of people arguing with Dr. Nors I wanted to get back to this.Sam Hurd is a special teamer 4th WR at best and its sad we are so upset he is out.Speaks volumes for the WR position if we are worried about him.WE MUST GET A WR NOW!!!Once we had Crayton as our #3.Now we have him as our 2 and inches behind T.O. very sad.Jerry has no other options but trade for a real WR.
 

arync

New Member
Messages
671
Reaction score
1
Pick6TerenceNewman;2218963 said:
Wade is dumb for playing Hurd!!!! Especially, how thin we are at WR. Now what?

I agree, what was Hurd doing out there anyway? He was going to make the team. It also seemed like Bartel was only looking for him in that first series. I'm glad Hurd and T.O. are cool so he can sleep in the chamber for the next week and get that ankle better
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
juckie;2219565 said:
After reading 7 pages of people arguing with Dr. Nors I wanted to get back to this.Sam Hurd is a special teamer 4th WR at best and its sad we are so upset he is out.Speaks volumes for the WR position if we are worried about him.WE MUST GET A WR NOW!!!Once we had Crayton as our #3.Now we have him as our 2 and inches behind T.O. very sad.Jerry has no other options but trade for a real WR.

It speaks volumes only because Austin and Stanback are injured, too. If those guys were healthy and Hurd got hurt then it would not be a big deal.
 

theebs

Believe!!!!
Messages
27,462
Reaction score
9,207
joseephuss;2219583 said:
It speaks volumes only because Austin and Stanback are injured, too. If those guys were healthy and Hurd got hurt then it would not be a big deal.


Bingo.
 

zrinkill

Cowboy Fan
Messages
49,136
Reaction score
32,706
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Thanos68;2219626 said:
Did YOU seriously just say THAT? Wade was not too bright in playing Hurd. Bad move.

Lord knows you do not play your 3rd or 4th stringers in a Preseason game.
 
Top