Nav22
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,490
- Reaction score
- 17,793
Here's the thing.
If I was promised that we'd win 2 of our next 3 games WITHOUT Romo, I'd want him to sit out the month. In such a scenario, the possibility of winning all 3 WITH Romo isn't enough to justify the risk.
But there is no guarantee that we'll win 2 of our next 3. An 0-3 run with Brad wouldn't shock me. At that point, Tony could take over 100% healthy for the stretch run, but he might be taking over a 4-5 team. A 4-5 team that will likely need to win 6 of their last 7 to make the postseason.
So BECAUSE the potential to lose our next 3 games without Romo does exist to me, I'm cool with Romo trying to play hurt IF he can throw okay with it and deal with the pain.
If I was promised that we'd win 2 of our next 3 games WITHOUT Romo, I'd want him to sit out the month. In such a scenario, the possibility of winning all 3 WITH Romo isn't enough to justify the risk.
But there is no guarantee that we'll win 2 of our next 3. An 0-3 run with Brad wouldn't shock me. At that point, Tony could take over 100% healthy for the stretch run, but he might be taking over a 4-5 team. A 4-5 team that will likely need to win 6 of their last 7 to make the postseason.
So BECAUSE the potential to lose our next 3 games without Romo does exist to me, I'm cool with Romo trying to play hurt IF he can throw okay with it and deal with the pain.