News: DMN: Candice Romo: Why the possibilities for Tony's future go way behind Cowboys, Broncos,

[noshame]

Mr. Mom.

 

[DallasEast]

What you wrote is quite redundant.

smh

Also, have you never heard the F. Scott Fitzgerald quote "the rich are different"?
They are.
Somehow their whine seems not as urgent as, say, someone like you or I.

So there are three people. A rich person. A poor person. And a stupid person.

The stupid person says something... err... stupid to the rich person. Immediately afterwards, the stupid person says the exact same stupid thing to the poor person.

In your world, a rich person complaining about the exact same stupid comment directed at both him/her AND the poor person should not be relevant or as relevant since one person HAS wealth and the other person does not. Got it.

smh. CowboysZone.

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

smh
So there are three people. A rich person. A poor person. And a stupid person.

The stupid person says something... err... stupid to the rich person. Immediately afterwards, the stupid person says the exact same stupid thing to the poor person.

In your world, a rich person complaining about the exact same stupid comment directed at both him/her AND the poor person should not be relevant or as relevant since one person HAS wealth and the other person does not. Got it.

smh. CowboysZone.

Reading comprehension is a lost art.
"Somehow their whine seems not as urgent..." the key word being "seems" ...

 

[DallasEast]

Reading comprehension is a lost art.
"Somehow their whine seems not as urgent..." the key word being "seems" ...

smh.

I understand you perfectly. Unfortunately, cognition isn't always a bilateral conversational trait.

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

smh.

I understand you perfectly. Unfortunately, cognition isn't always a bilateral conversational trait.

That's OK. With practice, it will come easier for you, and bilateral understanding will ensue, unilaterally that is.

 

[DallasEast]

That's OK. With practice, it will come easier for you, and bilateral understanding will ensue, unilaterally that is.

If I've told you once, I've told you a thousand times. Bowties aren't tourniquets. Your sense of fashion may be telling you overly tightening bowties is GQ but strangling your brain of oxygen isn't a good thing. Dude. Stop. Tugging.

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

If I've told you once, I've told you a thousand times. Bowties aren't tourniquets. Your sense of fashion may be telling you overly tightening bowties is GQ but strangling your brain of oxygen isn't a good thing. Dude. Stop. Tugging.

Aw Dad, you with your illogical musings and your careless use of the English language had me all up in knots.
But, seriously, Dad, stick to whatever you know and don't try to outmaneuver someone with more knowledge than you. As the bad guy in "3:10 to Yuma" said, "Sometimes a man has to be big enough to see how small he is."

 

[DallasEast]

Aw Dad, you with your illogical musings and your careless use of the English language had me all up in knots.
But, seriously, Dad, stick to whatever you know and don't try to outmaneuver someone with more knowledge than you. As the bad guy in "3:10 to Yuma" said, "Sometimes a man has to be big enough to see how small he is."

Nice quote Byron.

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

Nice quote Byron.

No, matey not Byron. It was Glen Hollander. Quit while you are ... ahem ... ahead.

 

[JoeKing]

Candice's brother is actor Chase Crawford. Maybe he could introduce Tony to some Hollywood connections.

 

[Melonfeud]

Candice's brother is actor Chase Crawford. Maybe he could introduce Tony to some Hollywood connections.

That would be pretty cool, him and his" crownies" commercial was a hoot and you could tell he enjoyed doing it, I think I only saw it twice on t.v.

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

Candice's brother is actor Chase Crawford. Maybe he could introduce Tony to some Hollywood connections.

THE Chase Crawford??????

 

[DallasEast]

No, matey not Byron. It was Glen Hollander. Quit while you are ... ahem ... ahead.

Haha. Same movie. Different scene. Which character went over the cliff again? You = Byron. Keep up dude.

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

Haha. Same movie. Different scene. Which character went over the cliff again? You = Byron. Keep up dude.

You mistook Byron McElroy for Glen Hollander, and your cheeks are red.
Your facial cheeks, that is. Your total fail.

Blimey, limey!

And, again you show a limited degree of observation. You imply Byron, by his own power, went over the cliff. He did not. He was pushed.
Any other storyline you wish to mangle or re-direct?
You are batting 0 for 2. And, like a punch-drunk boxer you are flailing.
Cease and retain what vestige of dignity you have left. I am embarrassed for you. You are no match.

 

[cowboy_ron]

OJ Simpson acted in some movies, not that he was very good.

The courtroom acting scene was his best....Oscar winning performance.

 

[DallasEast]

You mistook Byron McElroy for Glen Hollander, and your cheeks are red.
Your facial cheeks, that is. Your total fail.

Blimey, limey!

And, again you show a limited degree of observation. You imply Byron, by his own power, went over the cliff. He did not. He was pushed.
Any other storyline you wish to mangle or re-direct?
You are batting 0 for 2. And, like a punch-drunk boxer you are flailing.
Cease and retain what vestige of dignity you have left. I am embarrassed for you. You are no match.

I illustrated Candice's inner strength...
...and you take offense to my observation and poorly try minimizing her comment and mine.

I point out the flaw in your sarcasm...
...and you take offense with logic and double-down on your minimization.

I provide you with a helpful parable...
...and the parable either escapes you or its ignored. Regardless, you triple-down on your minimization.

I indicate your lack of understanding...
...and you weakly attempt turning your lack of recogition back upon me.

I throw my hands up and inject some levity into your crazy...
...and you parry humor with another heaping helping of the crazy and a movie quote to quadruple-down your minimization.

I simply used the movie YOU brought into the conversation to poke some indirect fun your way...
...and my reference (and scene) associated with the movie YOU mentioned goes completely over your head, prompting you to say that I (and not you) didn't know what I inferred.

I directly and clearly told you what I inferred...
...and you can't let go of your own intentional or unintentional cluelessness. You fall back on the Dead Scrolls ancient (and just as funny) golly old Englishman schtick, totally accuse me of misinterpreting a movie scene when I didn't, can't separate yourself from the ingrained BS you initiated in this tit-for-tac, and claim "victory" for what exactly I or any other sane human being would not know.

Enough. You may be emotionally entrenched within a loony I-Can't-Stand-Romo-So-Much-That-Even-His-Wife's-Valid-Comments-Tick-Me-Off universe but I am not. You both win and have the final word. However it would be personally advantageous if you kept the forum rules in mind before your fingers do the typing

I'm out.

 

[JoeKing]

THE Chase Crawford??????

Yes mate, the one and only.

 

[DFWJC]

I illustrated Candice's inner strength...
...and you take offense to my observation and poorly try minimizing her comment and mine.

I point out the flaw in your sarcasm...
...and you take offense with logic and double-down on your minimization.

I provide you with a helpful parable...
...and the parable either escapes you or its ignored. Regardless, you triple-down on your minimization.

I indicate your lack of understanding...
...and you weakly attempt turning your lack of recogition back upon me.

I throw my hands up and inject some levity into your crazy...
...and you parry humor with another heaping helping of the crazy and a movie quote to quadruple-down your minimization.

I simply used the movie YOU brought into the conversation to poke some indirect fun your way...
...and my reference (and scene) associated with the movie YOU mentioned goes completely over your head, prompting you to say that I (and not you) didn't know what I inferred.

I directly and clearly told you what I inferred...
...and you can't let go of your own intentional or unintentional cluelessness. You fall back on the Dead Scrolls ancient (and just as funny) golly old Englishman schtick, totally accuse me of misinterpreting a movie scene when I didn't, can't separate yourself from the ingrained BS you initiated in this tit-for-tac, and claim "victory" for what exactly I or any other sane human being would not know.

Enough. You may be emotionally entrenched within a loony I-Can't-Stand-Romo-So-Much-That-Even-His-Wife's-Valid-Comments-Tick-Me-Off universe but I am not. You both win and have the final word. However it would be personally advantageous if you kept the forum rules in mind before your fingers do the typing

I'm out.

You should ignore that clown. He's an embarrasment to the entire forum.
I have. Its refreshing not to see his useless drivel.
They give us the option for good reason

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

I illustrated Candice's inner strength...
...and you take offense to my observation and poorly try minimizing her comment and mine.

I point out the flaw in your sarcasm...
...and you take offense with logic and double-down on your minimization.

I provide you with a helpful parable...
...and the parable either escapes you or its ignored. Regardless, you triple-down on your minimization.

I indicate your lack of understanding...
...and you weakly attempt turning your lack of recogition back upon me.

I throw my hands up and inject some levity into your crazy...
...and you parry humor with another heaping helping of the crazy and a movie quote to quadruple-down your minimization.

I simply used the movie YOU brought into the conversation to poke some indirect fun your way...
...and my reference (and scene) associated with the movie YOU mentioned goes completely over your head, prompting you to say that I (and not you) didn't know what I inferred.

I directly and clearly told you what I inferred...
...and you can't let go of your own intentional or unintentional cluelessness. You fall back on the Dead Scrolls ancient (and just as funny) golly old Englishman schtick, totally accuse me of misinterpreting a movie scene when I didn't, can't separate yourself from the ingrained BS you initiated in this tit-for-tac, and claim "victory" for what exactly I or any other sane human being would not know.

Enough. You may be emotionally entrenched within a loony I-Can't-Stand-Romo-So-Much-That-Even-His-Wife's-Valid-Comments-Tick-Me-Off universe but I am not. You both win and have the final word. However it would be personally advantageous if you kept the forum rules in mind before your fingers do the typing

I'm out.

That's a lot of emotional outpouring.
Your epic fails are ... epic.
I hope you have learned from your missteps.
We all have different learning curves. Good luck on your emotional journeys, mate.

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

Yes mate, the one and only.