And a bad one at that. After we cut him, Carano never played for another NFL team. Carter, at least, started for another team. And Carter even had a winning record over his career despite playing for bad teams.
I guess it doesnt matter to me as much, because Carano wasnt an embarrassment to the franchise and was never expected to be much. He was a luxury pick at a time when we had tons of draft picks.
We used a late second-round pick on him. That's not a huge investment for a starting quarterback.
But while both were 2nd rd picks, we didnt trade away other picks to move up for Carono.
Irvin and Lett belong in any conversation about drugged out boneheads who have played for the Cowboys.
In terms of drugs, maybe. Thats the extent of it though. Irvin's a hall of fame player, one of the best ever. Lett could have been and at least was an extremely dominant player. Carter was a clown on and off the field.
And ended up costing the team dearly because they were drugged out boneheads.
Their good far outweighed their bad. They helped the team win 3 super bowls and it easily could have had a 4th.
Wait, you just claimed that Carter was drafted to be "the guy." Now you're claiming he played only because we were forced to play him? You can't have it both ways.
Thats not what I was claiming at all. The guy that was ahead of him was cut so Carter could start, they saw Banks as impeding his progress.
And even if Carter played only because we didn't have anyone else, it's pretty good that he posted a winning record and took a bad team to the playoffs as the starter.
He had very little to do with us winning alot of those games and alot of times we won in spite of him.
It's not that Carano couldn't beat out Staubach and White, it's that he never did anything in the NFL. Mark Brunell and Matt Hasselbeck couldn't beat out Brett Favre in Green Bay, but they went on to be successful with other teams (as did Aaron Brooks, to a lesser degree). There are are sorts of examples like that. Carano, however, isn't one of them. He was a complete washout who did next to nothing on the field.
I'm not arguing Carano did more than Carter on the field, I'm just saying he isnt the worst pick ever with all things considered. When you factor in the expectations on Carter that the franchise had, how lousy he was on and off the field and that we traded away some picks to move up to get him, to me that makes him a tremendous black eye to the organization. Especially doing what he did (timing wise) to get cut right before preseason started on a team that had expectations to be a playoff contender again. Nobody remembs cra about Carano, but everyone remembers what a waste Carter turned out to be.