I like Romo. The teams lack of success is not his fault. I would argue without him....a lot of those 8-8 years would have been 4-12 years. But this is pro sports. At some point if you are not part of the solution....you are part of the problem. The tenure he and Witten have been afforded is unheard of when you consider their lack of success. Look around the league....you simply don't stay with one team this long unless you have won or made a serious playoff run. The only other QB I can think of is Phillip Rivers...and he has played in an AFC title game. And for a position player...Witten's tenure without any success is downright unprecedented.
I don't care if Jerry thinks he can play 5 more years. I would draft a QB....give Romo 2 more years...and move on.
I liked the story and like romo but don't agree with you about blame
I think responsibility and blame is about power and romo has the most power in the organization after jerry and Stephen
Romo has power when he is on the field and maybe when the game plan is put together. He has no power when drafting players, who is signed as free agents, what the personnel is on defense.
Romo has done more than his share to win championships. The inept front office is the reason he doesn't have a Super Bowl.
Our F.O. has never spent enough resources to build our defense. Romo has never had a good defense in his career. 2007 and 2009 were OK, but not even good.
I know the highest he ever had was 9th and that year he went 13-3. By contrast Ben Roethlisberger has had the number 1 defense 4 times and number 2 once. 6 of his 10 seasons the Steelers finished in the top 5. Yet Ben gets praised for playoff wins and Super Bowls while Romo gets criticized.Tony Romo has never once had a dominating defense like Ben has had for the majority of his career.