ABQCOWBOY;1561759 said:
Article in USA Today asked the question, do we care about integrity in sports? With Vick and his deal, with cheating officials in the NBA, with Bonds and Steroids in MLB, do we really care or do we just want to see the TDs, the dunks and the HRs? Are these things important enough to stop watching or do we just want to stop hearing about it and watch the game, real or not?
I voted "NO" because while this stuff seems to be rampant in professional sports, in reality it is a small percentage of the players who are actually involved in criminal activities.
I don't have a clue what the actual percentage would be but the number of player who have been caught is pretty low compared with the number of players in the league.
The same applies to the NBA referees, only one guy has been implicated and it appears, so far, that his was an isolated case rather than something that is going on across the board.
The NFL & NBA have a lot of safeguards in place to help limit criminal activities among its employees (players, coaches, officials, etc.) because they understand how important public opinion is to their livelihood.
There has always been a certain amount of criminal, unethical, and immoral activities associated with professional sports. Two of the NFL's biggest stars were suspended for a year in 1962 for gambling (Alex Karas & Paul Hornung). Connie Hawkins was banned from the NBA for life (later rescinded and he was allowed to play at the end of his career) for not reporting a points shaving attempt while in college. There have been several others over the years and the leagues have dealt with them so this is really nothing new.
What is relatively new is the glorification of the "thug" or "gangsta" lifestyle common among many young athletes today. There are things associated with that lifestyle that are not conducive with being a professional anything, let alone a high profile profession like sports.
In many ways it is similar to the "hippie" movement of the late 60s and early 70s where the "establishment" was something they wanted nothing to do with and "sex, drugs and rock-and-roll" were what they were about. Now it is sex, drugs, and rap, not a lot of difference. Neither lifestyle works for adults because you have responsibilities in life once you reach a certain age and you either meet them or suffer the consequences.
The biggest difference was the financial implications in both eras. In the 60s & 70s players didn't make that much relative to the average professional in the workforce but now there is a huge gap and athletes make many times what the average college-degreed professional makes.
The point is that as a professional athlete making millions of dollars they have a responsibility to represent the league in such a way that it is not detrimental to it. If they can't do that then the league would be foolish not to cut ties with them no matter how talented or famous they are.
If Vick is found guilty and never plays in the NFL again he will quickly be forgotten. The same is true for Adam Jones. These guys will become the Art Schlichter's of the world "Hey, didn't you used to play pro ball? What ever happened to you anyway?"
Falcons fans may bemoan his loss and endlessly debate the "what if"s of not losing him but in the end the league and the fans will move on and he will become a footnote. That is something that doesn't impinge on these guys' psyches, that in the end, they are ultimately unimportant to the game as it will go on with or without them.