"moronic thread," "stupid thread," "shut this thread down," rolled-eyes emoticons, etc. I think that speaks volumes.
It says that you have an entire thread based on a psychological profile being done by a person who doesn't know the subject, and has no statements or actions from the subject that would substantiate the profile. If it speaks volumes, that is what it says.
Dreaming what up? I'm asking a question. I didn't matter-of-factly say "Troy secretly resents Troy's success." Did you spot the word "does"? Makes all the difference.
If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there, does it make a sound?
That's right. I'm doing a psychological profile. I asked if Troy could possibly be jealous. You find the notion absurd. So why are you still here? Why waste my time? Move on.
What I find absurd is not that a question could be asked (even though I don't understand what is so fascinating about this particular question) but that an assertion could be made (for I would suggest that you have done more in this thread than just ask, you have said, if I've read you correctly, that you "think" or "feel" that he is.) without any evidence for it. Indeed, when the evidence that exists is directly opposed to the assertion.
We're talking about sharing a spotlight. Logic isn't a factor.
I agree that logic is dismissed when it comes to a great many things.
Of course not. Just like you prepare yourself for the day your ex-wife remarries. You're not her world anymore. That's gotta hurt, just a little.
Thankfully I don't know what that feels like, I've been married to the same woman, my first wife, for 23 years now. But I do suspect that that hurts.
Another sign that you refuse to take this question seriously, so please recuse yourself.