plymkr
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,385
- Reaction score
- 15,496
I wana know what happened to the rule of reviewing where if evidence isn't indisputable, you stay with the call on the field. In my biased eyes, that should have been a catch, but how can anybody say there was definitive video evidence justifying one call or the other? There wasn't. It was called a catch on the field and should have remained one just like the Cobb call
Exactly! This is the second playoff loss for us in the Romo era where a booth review was inconclusive and the reversed the call. My opinion of the Dez catch is it arguably could have been called incomplete by the rule but since they called it a catch on the field, then they need indisputable proof to overturn it. I feel lunging to the goal line is a football move. But with the replay I don't feel there was indisputable proof the call needed to be reversed. But that's not the play that lost it for us. I would rate the Murray fumble as #1, bailey miss#2 and then the call reversal as #3.