fansince68
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,528
- Reaction score
- 3,312
Sadly we are at the top of that list.I actually disagree. There are teams who see him as a top 10 QB.
Sadly we are at the top of that list.I actually disagree. There are teams who see him as a top 10 QB.
We don't have anyone to develop a qb on this staff. It's quite obvious. The most telling fact is we refuse to bring in competition.They should have been doing this regardless. Patriots were drafting QBs regularly even when they had Brady. They developed them and traded them for picks.
Have some sobering news for you he’s going be starting until they find someone better. Jerry isn’t about to leave himself without a QB and go through years of QB hell. Some of you want us to end up like Washington. If they had a viable QB they would probably be better than the Cowboys. They’ve been looking for a QB ever since they moved on from Kirk Cousins. They would be making the playoffs practically every year had they kept him and wouldn’t have wasted a number of draft picks.Once Dak knows he won’t be starting he will beg to be traded and with luck some other team will need a QB in week 3 or 4 because of injury. If not then let him sit all year long. Bye Dak.
No agenda. And I don’t believe Dak has to be the guy to win the game. He just can’t be the guy who loses the game, like he did yesterday. Their 3rd string rookie did not win the game but he didn’t lose it. Your criticism of the receivers was really a criticism of Dak not being able to read defenses or find the open man. Dak was exposed yesterday and you tried to deflect. Enough.one play and expand over 1000s of plays...
can I do the same for any QB and just take a single play and extrapolate to 1000s of plays.
btw, I am not saying Dak is absolved. but I am not dismissing the short comings of the rest of the team for "one play". so was ty hilton open on every play based on that one play?
but yeah, I get your agenda. you just want a single person to carry the burden of all the fault and short comings. that's the type of thinking that Jones has had that got us here in the first place. because we think one single thing is the difference between a championship and not having one.
I definitely have been a Dak supporter, but after yesterday it should be heavily considered. Maybe someone falls in the first and if they're the best player go get them if they're the BPA. If not there definitely in the 2nd or 3rd. Cowboys will have to do some work in free agency first to sure up some spots they may lose players at.Everyone that watched yesterday’s game knows exactly why the Cowboys lost.
Enough time, money, and resources have been invested in Dak Prescott to get to a Championship. And it hasn’t happened.
And if you’re a rational organization, you admit that and realize it’s unlikely that it ever will.
Now because of poor management, you’re financially stuck with the player and two years of the contract. But that doesn’t mean you have to be stuck on the field.
Draft a quarterback.
Send a message to the incumbent and give yourself another valid option. And allow yourself an ‘out’ from the disappointing results and financial burden.
It’s time.
I don't disagree, but the way jerry boy did it is the last two years you get hit full amount and then some....so we take the hit. limit our FA signing, suffer two years and then walk away or perhaps even walk away on a post june release and suffer to milder years.I wouldn’t TOUCH that current contract. All they’ll do is make a BAD situation WORSE.
again, was he a contributor? yes. did he have a large impact? yes. were there others at fault? yes.No agenda. And I don’t believe Dak has to be the guy to win the game. He just can’t be the guy who loses the game, like he did yesterday. Their 3rd string rookie did not win the game but he didn’t lose it. Your criticism of the receivers was really a criticism of Dak not being able to read defenses or find the open man. Dak was exposed yesterday and you tried to deflect. Enough.
I actually disagree. There are teams who see him as a top 10 QB.
Rush wins this game if he starts.If I couldn’t get another QB in the draft or on the cheap I would start Rush before Dak.
And I think a decent quarterback will put Dak on the bench. hopefully he'll take a pay cut to play somewhere else.Everyone that watched yesterday’s game knows exactly why the Cowboys lost.
Enough time, money, and resources have been invested in Dak Prescott to get to a Championship. And it hasn’t happened.
And if you’re a rational organization, you admit that and realize it’s unlikely that it ever will.
Now because of poor management, you’re financially stuck with the player and two years of the contract. But that doesn’t mean you have to be stuck on the field.
Draft a quarterback.
Send a message to the incumbent and give yourself another valid option. And allow yourself an ‘out’ from the disappointing results and financial burden.
It’s time.
Fat Mike is actually known for developing QBs. He's worked with Montana, Grbac, Gannon, Favre and obviously Rodgers.We don't have anyone to develop a qb on this staff. It's quite obvious. The most telling fact is we refuse to bring in competition.