Bob Sacamano
Benched
- Messages
- 57,084
- Reaction score
- 3
nyc;2651840 said:Parcells might draft Brace if that is the case. :laugh2:
Of course Parcells doesn't like guys who eat "biscuits". :
I vote we never mention this Brace character again
nyc;2651840 said:Parcells might draft Brace if that is the case. :laugh2:
Of course Parcells doesn't like guys who eat "biscuits". :
iRoot4Losers;2651851 said:I vote we never mention this Brace character again
iRoot4Losers;2651645 said:this isn't the traditional 3-4 where the NT just sits there
RamziD;2652230 said:Ratliff will be best used as a DE now that our depth there is depleted. His pass rushing skills can be best utilized there.
Phillips had Jamal Williams in San Diego and Pat Williams in Buffalo, both 320 lb + guys. Don't tell me he can't use a big NT in his 3-4 defense. You've really just become a broken record...
Rampage;2652246 said:_______>Bob
SLATEmosphere;2652256 said:The remaining ILB's would all be reaches at 51...The real value would only be S and DT
iRoot4Losers;2652247 said:who?.
iRoot4Losers;2652343 said:http://img156.*************/img156/1117/99208075.jpg
SLATEmosphere;2652256 said:The remaining ILB's would all be reaches at 51...The real value would only be S and DT
Chocolate Lab;2650648 said:Just wondering what people would take with our first pick, assuming no trade up, if they were running things.
For S&G, include O-line if you prefer.
Naturally, you would go BPA if one jumps out as far superior to the others. But assume for a minute they are all roughly the same.
I would go ILB simply because we have literally no one else to play there and I don't offhand know of any good FAs we could put there. I think we're in real trouble there. (I'm not a Burnett believer if you can't tell.)
I can see DE, though, by the "planet theory" that you go with big talent first. But I think that sometimes teams use that kind of thinking to reach on big underachievers at around this point. And in our case, Olshansky is IMO a reasonable possibility.
I'd go SS last, probably, because I tend to think that S is the easiest hole to fill on the defense.
What do you think?
Manwiththeplan;2652836 said:Give me a safety at #51. I like Brace, but I think he's not a value at 51 and I think there's a good chance he'll be there at #69. The only real teams I can see taking brace before we pick in rd 3 are Pittsburgh, Miami or KC.