Eagles and Commanders; both teams looking weak.

This was not a good game or outcome.

It's obvious the game has passed Philly/Mcnabb by.

The Redsk*ns look competent enough to win 8+ games now and possibly challenge for a playoff spot. :puke:

It's going to be an unbearable football season here in the Nation's Capital.
 
Clove;1652838 said:
1.McNabb is not accurate, never has been, and has absolutely no receivers.

2.Stinks have a grind it out type offense, with a couple of big play receivers.

3.Romo is the key to beating both these teams. He's magical, and he's better than both those QB's put together.
Never has been accurate? :confused: If I recall, before some of his injuries, his QB rating was in the 100's
 
Obviously 2 teams are in trouble in the east. The wheels will come off in NY and it looks like Philly could be in trouble. McNabb is obviously still very gimpy and they sill have weak WRs. The Giants will jump ship on their coach before long. The Skins could gain confidence, as theebs says, but with their young QB they are ne real threat to win the NFC title and if we have to be scared of them,we aren't NFC champion contenders anyway.
 
parchy;1652833 said:
We are going to beat the ever-loving tar out of the Commanders if they play like that.

That's assuming that our offense plays like it has.

Can't wait until we play them - hopefully we don't lose or another remote will be smashed and dumped in the trash can.
 
FuzzyLumpkins;1652818 said:
Its called bad QB play.

Neither are accurate and McNabb just doesnt have the burst to get thiose first downs with his legs on third and long anymore.

JC is still raw and misses throws as well.


it really makes me appreciate how accurate Romo was.

That's the way I saw it too...

Both QB's looked terrible and I will add in both WR corps. Washington's looked better than Philly's, but neither were anything to write home about tonight...
 
CowboyWay;1652850 said:
We'll put 30 on either one of these teams. And both these teams need 2 games to score 30 points.


After 2 games

Commanders team has 3 TD's
Marion Barber has 3 TD's :laugh2:
 
How can a team expect to survive on a long-term basis without both starting tackles? One, maybe, but not both. They can't have that kind of depth.
 
Avery;1652903 said:
That's assuming that our offense plays like it has.

Can't wait until we play them - hopefully we don't lose or another remote will be smashed and dumped in the trash can.

We had the Commanders beaten last year but the FG was blocked and there was the bs call on Taylor.
 
bbgun;1653104 said:
How can a team expect to survive on a long-term basis without both starting tackles? One, maybe, but not both. They can't have that kind of depth.

Their LT Samuels is back isn't he?

They lost their RG and RT


But having backups making up the entire right side of the line can not be a good situation
 
BigDFan5;1653109 said:
Their LT Samuels is back isn't he?

They lost their RG and RT


But having backups making up the entire right side of the line can not be a good situation

Someone on another board said Samuels. They were wrong. Either way, 2/5 of their line is gone.
 
BigDFan5;1653109 said:
Their LT Samuels is back isn't he?

They lost their RG and RT


But having backups making up the entire right side of the line can not be a good situation

Jason Fabini is now starting for them. :lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2:
 
I'm not worried in the slightest.

Granted, every game between NFCE teams is always a fight, but we're head and shoulders above every other team in our division.
 
bbgun;1653112 said:
Someone on another board said Samuels. They were wrong. Either way, 2/5 of their line is gone.

Agreed it will hurt them badly, losing Samuels would flat out end their season
 
Based on the Commanders schedule they could concievably be 6-0 before playing the Patriots on October 28. They play the Giants at home, Lions at home, Packers on the road and Cardinals at home. Not a lot of fire power in those opponents. With us playing the Bears on the road, I don't really want to be chasing the Deadskins for 4 weeks. Any thoughts???
 
I'm sure Gibbs will take it one game at a time. If I had to take a guess...

Giants - W
Lions - W
@Packers - L
Cards - W
 
Let's just see how things materalize over the next few weeks, and after 4 games or so, we should definitely get an idea as to what team should be able to do what against each other.

But judging from recent history, these teams always play close games. (okay, most of the time)
 
dfense;1652880 said:
Never has been accurate? :confused: If I recall, before some of his injuries, his QB rating was in the 100's

The only year he was anywhere near that high was the year he had T.O. His quarterback rating, TD's and completion percentage were WELL above his career averages FOR THAT one year.

Tex
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
466,181
Messages
13,921,350
Members
23,795
Latest member
Derekbsenior
Back
Top