Oh_Canada
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,083
- Reaction score
- 4,222
Peters didn't practice today. They keep saying he'll play but I wonder if he's even close to full strength.
Maybe he is getting a case of the Hardy-itis?
Peters didn't practice today. They keep saying he'll play but I wonder if he's even close to full strength.
My heart tells me we can win this game and we can, but my head tells me as always this team will find a way to break my heart and lose this game. That's what they do. It's all they know how to do.
yeah, like lose his top-3 QB to injury! what an idiot!
Man, this sentiment truly is annoying to listen to. Enough with the damn excuses.
We had 3, and possibly 4, games that we should have won DESPITE losing our QB and yet we found a way to lose them due to stupid play calling, coaching, and no attempts to make any sort of game time adjustments.
Great argument.
I'll take Romo.
Yeah Rodgers is more talented, but Romo has done more with less.
How many times has Rodgers had to carry a team from behind? In fact he's been pretty pedestrian at having to comeback. He's had one of the best coaching staffs in the league that have an actual offensive scheme in place so he doesn't have to do as much to get the ball down field as opposed to Romo who has basically been our offensive coordinator for years. Green Bay's defense has never really been elite statistically in years, but they've always been one of the best teams in terms of takeaways and getting timely stops unlike the Cowboys defense that has coughed up lead after lead that Tony has nearly routinely given them. Rodgers wouldn't have a ring either if he had to carry this team every season and had a staff that had no element of creativity. Why do you think he always has recievers WIDE OPEN? Because they have an actual scheme, creativity, and deception in their offense. Something Jason Garrett is clueless about.
Knowing Garrett he'll wait until the Cowboys are officially eliminated from the playoffs before he starts opening things up and taking some chances.
Bradford doesn't like to get hit. Dallas hit him a lot without Hardy and Gregory.
Get to Bradford, and this will be a victory.
Yes. Kraken smash....
Field goals are only worth 3. Nothing times three is 16
Math not your forte?
1 TD and 1 Extra Point = 7
3 FGs = 9
7+9 = ......., you guessed it (or maybe not!), 16!!!!!
Absolutely. We won't have to worry about him keeping the ball on the PA plays and I have no doubt Hardy will own him like Lee owned Murray.
There is a part of me that wants to send everything AND the kitchen sink at him on nearly every play, even if it exposes us on the back end. That team must pay and he must be the payer -- I want to see him crawling off the field at game's end.
You don't think I'm a Cowboys fan you've questioned my fandom many times which shows how lost you are. I'm curious what makes me a troll in your opinion?
All I hear is a bunch of excuses. You go ahead and take Romo, and I'll beat you every time.
Rodgers wouldn't have beat Romo even with the ineptitude at head coach if Blandino didn't make the most egregious overturn of the year.
Sure he would have. Even if Dez scores, the Dallas defense had not stopped Rodgers at all in the 2nd half. He would have still had 4 minutes to score, and I'm pretty sure he would have.
I doubt it. I don't know that he had another full drive with that calf injury.
Your glee in bashing the team. Your acceptance of any ridiculous view that makes them look bad or an opponent look good. Your list. Your inability to glean how you're perceived. Your willingness to lie about your own posting. Your laughable attempt to insult people who make you look foolish by calling them fans. Your position that a blowout victory over the Jags was evidence of cracks in the team that you trotted out last year. Your misguided belief that the team's performance without a guy you spent years diminishing is evidence of your myopic views on the team.
Considering all of this and the sheer amount of hatred you continue to spew at the team, I have little confidence that your views will be actuated by that perfect impartiality which has ever been considered most favorable to correct decisions.