Early games thread

[mldardy]

And no one ever said there was definitive evidence. This is called “strawmanning”

OMG dude, you are annoying. Do you the meaning of the words MOVE ON. You aren't going to change my mind.

 

[SuperBowlz]

4 teams

Rams scored 70-27 against a previous Baltimore Colts team.
Bears beat the Skins 73-0
Skins beat the Giants 72-41
Dolphins beat the Brocos 70-20

Easily found via search. Try that next time before you falsely try to correct someone.

Thanks for correcting me. I didn't know that!

 

[KJJ]

San Francisco’s defense has AZ intimidated. The 49ers should take care of them easily.

 

[Cowboys1966]

No he's not. There is no definitive evidence that his foot his out of bounds. You don't know what you are talking about either. Neither you nor him is going to change my mind but you keep trying to very unsuccessfully.

OMG, what are you not getting. The call on the field was out of bounds. Therefore, there has to be clear and obvious evidence evidence that his foot was in bounds… there was not. End of story.

 

[Aerolithe_Lion]

OMG dude, you are annoying. Do you the meaning of the words MOVE ON. You aren't going to change my mind.

We all know I won’t; but I can change everyone else’s while they listen to you blabber.

 

[mldardy]

OMG, what are you not getting. The call on the field was out of bounds. Therefore, there has to be clear and obvious evidence evidence that his foot was in bounds… there was not. End of story.

We all know I won’t; but I can change everyone else’s while they listen to you blabber.

OMG. You two need to get a room

 

[KingCorcoran]

I sense some bad blood between Hurts and AJ Brown

Nine receptions, 175 yards today…there are 50 receivers in the NFL that would love to trade places with Brown…including Lamb. Bad blood? Brown will not get a subsequent contract from Philly even if he were married to Hurts.

 

[Aerolithe_Lion]

OMG. You two need to get a room

This is the room, early games thread about things that actually did happen in the early games, such as:

Inconclusive evidence resulting in a confirmed out of bounds ruling.

 

[Cowboys1966]

OMG. You two need to get a room

Spoken like someone who is clearly wrong. Just admit it and move on…peace.

 

[SuperBowlz]

Yes, I saw the thread of people defending him claiming you can lift your back leg before the snap but that is not true. The rule is very clear, once the lineman set he cannot move in any way the simulates a snap of the ball.

This is a false start: https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nf...ons-false-start-was-a-false-start/ar-AA1hixok

Not research here. I'll see if I can find it for you. I think I saw it on Baldys Breakdowns. People used to say this about Jason Peters and Baldinger went on and on how, to the eye, it looks like he's moving early, but he's not.

 

[mldardy]

This is the room, early games thread about things that actually did happen in the early games, such as:

Inconclusive evidence resulting in a confirmed out of bounds ruling.

Still going huh. I would hate to see someone tell you no about anything. You would never get it.

 

[Aerolithe_Lion]

Still going huh. I would hate to see someone tell you no about anything. You would never get it.

“No with reason” is a tremendously different statement than “No because I said so.”

 

[Cowboys1966]

This is the room, early games thread about things that actually did happen in the early games, such as:

Inconclusive evidence resulting in a confirmed out of bounds ruling.

Aero I’m gonna say you’re wrong on this… the referee said the call stands…he did not say confirmed. I’m nit picking here.

 

[Cowboys1966]

Still going huh. I would hate to see someone tell you no about anything. You would never get it.

Dude, you’re doing the exact same thing… Enough already, you were clearly wrong… And making crap up at this point will not change anything.

 

[Cowboys1966]

“No with reason” is a tremendously different statement than “No because I said so.”

Like mldardy lol…

 

[mldardy]

Aero I’m gonna say you’re wrong on this… the referee said the call stands…he did not say confirmed. I’m nit picking here.

Dude, you’re doing the exact same thing… Enough already, you were clearly wrong… And making crap up at this point will not change anything.

“No with reason” is a tremendously different statement than “No because I said so.”

Still going huh. I would hate to see someone tell either of you no about anything. Neither of you would never get it. 'What does no mean?' 'Do they speak English in No?'

 

[mldardy]

Like mldardy lol…

Like Cowboys1966 lol Never heard the word 'no' or 'move on' It's like kryptonite.

 

[Cowboys1966]

Still going huh. I would hate to see someone tell either of you no about anything. Neither of you would never get it. 'What does no mean?' 'Do they speak English in No?'

Gaslight much? You’re doing everything that you say that i am doing. You obviously have no comprehension on the rules of football. That’s OK…but you also obviously have no idea on the rules of debate. When you continuously accuse people of doing exactly what you are, you look foolish… I’m cheering for you, though I think you have what it takes to get past this. massive lol.

 

[KJJ]

San Francisco making it look easy against easy against AZ.

 

[mldardy]

Gaslight much? You’re doing everything that you say that i am doing. You obviously have no comprehension on the rules of football. That’s OK…but you also obviously have no idea on the rules of debate. When you continuously accuse people of doing exactly what you are, you look foolish… I’m cheering for you, though I think you have what it takes to get past this. massive lol.

Here he is again. Back for more. You can't help yourself.

'I'm going to win this argument no matter what'