I would have taken Tunsil (Even with that crap going on during the draft) or Ramsey. I look at what the Jags did in the first 3 rounds and I'm quite jealous with how it turned out.
Okay. Thanks for answering.
I definitely wouldn't have taken Tunsil at 4. Although I do think he's a pretty special OT. The team just has so much draft currency already taken up on the OL.
Ramsey, I can see. I liked him a lot too. However, I liked him a good bit more as a safety than a corner and Dallas has Byron Jones playing the same spot that I think Ramsey should play.
Could Dallas had made room for a player like Ramsey? Of course. They could have had a dynamic safety duo in Jones/Ramsey or they could have played him at Cornerback (a less desirable choice, IMO).
To me though, it would have come down to this question: Is Elliott a better RB than Ramsey is a DB? In my opinion, Elliott is the answer there. I think he is a rare player who will help the team a ton.
Does everyone see it that way? No. I understand your thinking (as well as everyone who wanted Ramsey's thinking) but in this case, I just disagree.
As far as Elliott's blocking... I've probably read 100 times since the draft that Elliott is terrific in blitz pick-up. Urban Meyer said Elliott is the best player he's ever had when the ball wasn't in his hands (referencing his blocking prowess).
Plenty of people question taking a RB at 4... but I have yet to see, hear or read from anyone that Elliott isn't a great blocker.