Define "playing well"? How do you objectively measure this?
Not much of a running game to back him up? Have we scored a passing touchdown? Haven't all the touchdowns that have been scored come on the ground? Who has the most touchdowns on the team so far?
Second, you say "No turnovers as well." Aahhh. So basically what you've just said is that it's possible to play well
AND have no turnovers. So is it possible for Zeke to have played well despite his two fumbles? Or are you including his fumbles into the equation of him not playing well? This is why I asked you above to define "playing well".
So the line isn't playing up to par, teams are stacking to stop the line, but Zeke is playing poorly? I'm sorry, is Zeke supposed to play well when the line is playing poorly?
You yourself just admitted the source of the problem.
Oh, and not playing great is not the same as playing poorly. That's what I'm trying to get you to see.
I will agree that Zeke isn't playing to the expectations that many of us envisioned for him. True. But I wouldn't say he has been playing poorly.
So far, his stats are 20 carries for 50 yards 2.5 yard average and 1 TD; 21 carries for 83 4.0 yards average and 1 TD.
I would call that pedestrian, but not necessary stellar. But I wouldn't call it poorly. Maybe if you consider the expectations set for him, yes.
But sans expectation, I wouldn't say that was poor.
With all due respect, unless we've watched every play, we can't say that. The links only give you a few plays to analyze. Just saying.