Empty backfield

when have we made a smart offensive play call with Romo audibling the living hell out of it
 
who else thinks empty backfield is a bad idea by completely taking out zeke as a running threat?

its fine at times to mix things up. But you need good WR's. When all you have is Dez, Williams, Witten, and Beasley its a big problem.
 
my question is what possible situation would there be that we would take zeke out of the backfield? 4WR should be plenty to force the D to defend the pass???
 
who else thinks empty backfield is a bad idea by completely taking out zeke as a running threat?

I think its a tool you have in the toolbox, but damn it does sure seem we try to drive a nail with sandpaper too often.
 
who else thinks empty backfield is a bad idea by completely taking out zeke as a running threat?

I literally complain about it every game in the game day thread.

Inexplicably we go empty set once we're on the cusp of the redzone (20-30 yards).

And it seems like we're usually sacked or called for holding because the defense will blitz while all of our receivers are clogging up each others lanes in a truncated amount of space on the field.

I can only remember once this season when it worked well and that was the TD pass to Witt against the hapless 49ers.
 
Last edited:
Nothing like after a nice run to go empty backfield. We do it 8 to 10 times a game. Instead of running again or running play action of the run which is actually a strength of Dak
 
And with Dak as QB the defenses know there is no threat of a pass. Empty Backfield is a lose lose situation

I am still a Dak fan and firmly believe he will bounce back, but geez that caught me and made me laugh, and feel bad.
 
my question is what possible situation would there be that we would take zeke out of the backfield? 4WR should be plenty to force the D to defend the pass???

You're talking about 10 personnel.

It typically forces the defense into an undersized dime package, which is good to have a surprise run against every now and then-- especially if you have a guy like Dak who can also carry the ball.

In 2016, we ran that formation on 1% of plays.
 
Empty backfield and we have a TE that runs a yard short of the 1st down. No speed WR's to get downfield. And the deepest route is 15 yards as Dak dumps it off to the player 2 yards up from the LOS as the safety valve. Yeah real ingenuity there.
 
its fine at times to mix things up. But you need good WR's. When all you have is Dez, Williams, Witten, and Beasley its a big problem.

Guarantee you that Brady, Rodgers, Romo, Roethlisberger, Stafford, Luck, Cousins, Winston, Goff and Wentz would have good stats with that receiving core and our offensive line. I guarantee it.

On that note, what 4 WRs would you give Dak so that he could be a good empty set QB?
 
When was the last time we ran a draw play? We used to do it with Murray all the time.


I remember hearing someone say (ex coach) that this shows you when a defense fears the QB. If a draw plays work.

So there's your answer .
 
It's really stupid with a stud RB. It's even more stupid when the defense knows the exact routes all 5 receivers will be running.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,011
Messages
14,506,480
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top