News: ESPN: Cowboys 'impressed' with Dak's rehab progress

You're new on here, or you created a different profile, so you have no idea what I refuse to do or how I see the team or its players.

Dak wasn't the 2nd highest paid QB throwing zero TDs so when you talk perhaps you should get facts straight. But like most Dak haters I'm not sure you are capable using facts, all negative and no positive
He likes to make assumptions about posters.
It's like his thing.
 
You're new on here, or you created a different profile, so you have no idea what I refuse to do or how I see the team or its players.

Dak wasn't the 2nd highest paid QB throwing zero TDs so when you talk perhaps you should get facts straight. But like most Dak haters I'm not sure you are capable using facts, all negative and no positive
So are you or are you not seeing the issues in Dak having a combined ZERO TD passes in those embarrassingly low scoring loses? You said I have no idea what you refuse, but then you didn't refute what I said. You just went on to defend Dak and call people Dak haters that you're not sure are capable of using facts. Is it not a fact that Dak had ZERO TD passes in three EXTREMLY low scoring loses in a season where that could've been the difference in 8-8 and 11-5? Or are you just gonna call me a "hater" and gloss right over that again?
 
The Cowboys worry me when they give positive news about an injury. They normally seem to be overly optimistic on the updates and it's not nearly as good as they portray. I hope they are correct, but I take this info with a handful of salt.
 
Explain how I am wrong.....I will wait. The fact is his ankle has yet to be tested in game situations so just because you got emotionally butthurt and felt the need to somehow rush to Dak's defense when all that was stated was a fact shows more about you than anyone else.
you made an assumption that his leg is not healed. everyone of you haters here was calling him gimpy, etc....now you are claiming he is not being chased by 300lb lineman, he must not be healed.... you are so so so desparate for anything negative you go to the ends of the world to try and be negative...what is with you?

and here you go with insults....can I ask you are angry because I did the same to you and you are looking to get even or something...you sound very desperate and acting and jumping on anything to just attack...

I didn't rush to his defense. I took the news. he is healing faster than expected.

and on the contrary, didn't you rush to attack him by coming up with some kind of scenario to buy you more time...

so once he does get chased by 300lb linemen and he is fine...what's your next line of attack?

why are you acting so desperate?
 
Done with your "please notice me" game as that is all you do in your posts. I suggest you Rockport get together and break out the hand lotion while self gratifying yourselves to your 'meaningful' CZ posts.
WOW. you have gone over the edge now....you held back. simmered in anger. let the hate build up. tried to be nice (fake) and then exploded into your own self.

btw, what kind of lotion do you recommend? LOL
 
What about in 2019 when our defense held three of our opponents to grand totals of 12, 13, and 17 points and we lost all three of those game? Dak threw a total of ZERO TDs combined in those games.

Daks poor play was the reason we went 8-8 instead of 11-5 in 2019. It wasn't the defenses fault.

Talk about cherry picking stats! You picked through 2019 looking for games that the opponents didn't score much AND that we lost. Then you lay 100% of the blame at Dak's feet. How about Zeek never rushing for 100 yards in any of those games? Two of them he didn't even get 50 yards. 18 rushes for 35 yards against New Orleans. 21 for 86 against New England. He went for a whopping 18 for 47 against the Eagles. One of those games Cooper literally just didn't do a thing. Just disappeared. If you've been watching, Cooper just disappears at times.

There were other games where the defense held and the offense was rolling, but you didn't include those while blaming Dak for the losses. If he is the sole reason we lost those games, then he's the sole reason we won those other games. Both of those assumptions are ridiculous.

This is a team sport. Our QB is definitely not our biggest issue. He's one of the bright spots. We have lots of issues. Defense. OL health. Defense. Poor play calling on both sides of the ball. Defense.
 
He gets offended very easy. Always complaining about someone calling him names..... even when they don't. I said he made an idiotic comment and he cried saying I called him names Haha
it looked like he was looking for an excuse to go on an insult tirade because the very next post he lost it and tried....

so predicable are the simple minds.
 
The legend of the 5 year, 1-2 playoff record Qb that hasn’t won squat, can only grow with this fan base.....the rest of the NFL knows better

Never before has so much asss kissing been bestowed on someone who has accomplished so little.
47c84ef03413ba70fc818a5a0851652a.gif
 
Yes I "get it", but why don't you understand that when you have MVPs and Super Bowls to your name you get a little more leeway when you lose a low scoring game? Dak and his 1 Wild Card win doesn't get the same type of leeway that Brady and his 7 Super Bowl rings get. I know that is impossible to believe that Dak is not on that level, but it's true, and I'm sorry for that.

Brady wins at least 3 rings with Garrett 2007, 2014, and 2016.

I do not think Brady wins a Super Bowl with the 2020 Cowboys. I do think Brady wins the division and maybe a playoff game.

Now, if you're just going to do your normal thing and insult me and pretend you're just sooooo much smarter (even though you clearly don't use capitalization or punctuation) then don't waste your time because I won't respond.
so how long was manning's leash when he went 6 years before winning a playoff game.....he started 0-4........

and you act as if the last chapter on Dak has been written....so 1-2 in the playoffs means he will never win anything? is that it? is that you logic?

so Watson (one of your favorites), is 1-2 in the playoffs. I guess watson is done. he should just hang it up.....

and if a QB doesn't win anything in the first 5 years in the league, does it mean they never will?
 
Talk about cherry picking stats! You picked through 2019 looking for games that the opponents didn't score much AND that we lost. Then you lay 100% of the blame at Dak's feet. How about Zeek never rushing for 100 yards in any of those games? Two of them he didn't even get 50 yards. 18 rushes for 35 yards against New Orleans. 21 for 86 against New England. He went for a whopping 18 for 47 against the Eagles. One of those games Cooper literally just didn't do a thing. Just disappeared. If you've been watching, Cooper just disappears at times.

There were other games where the defense held and the offense was rolling, but you didn't include those while blaming Dak for the losses. If he is the sole reason we lost those games, then he's the sole reason we won those other games. Both of those assumptions are ridiculous.

This is a team sport. Our QB is definitely not our biggest issue. He's one of the bright spots. We have lots of issues. Defense. OL health. Defense. Poor play calling on both sides of the ball. Defense.
The bright spot would throw at least 1 measly TD in three extremely low scoring games. The bright spot don't have terrible numbers against any defense with a pulse. I'm sorry, but I'm a realist when it comes to Dak and that's not going to change until he proves me wrong.
 
so how long was manning's leash when he went 6 years before winning a playoff game.....he started 0-4........

and you act as if the last chapter on Dak has been written....so 1-2 in the playoffs means he will never win anything? is that it? is that you logic?

so Watson (one of your favorites), is 1-2 in the playoffs. I guess watson is done. he should just hang it up.....

and if a QB doesn't win anything in the first 5 years in the league, does it mean they never will?
You have to make the playoffs to go 0-4 in playoff games. Dak is 1-2. I really don't see how bringing up the fact that Manning went to the playoffs 4 of his first 6 season helps in this argument you're trying to make. IF Dak makes it this year then he will have been 3 of his first 6 years. That's less then Manning. Again, comparing Dak to all time greats is so weird, but ok.

You bring up about Manning went on to do this or that, unlike you, I like to look at what Dak has done so far and judge him off that instead of what you HOPE he does in the future. If he starts to win Super Bowls and MVPS then my opinions will change on him, but I'm not living in a fantasy land until then.

Yes, Watson is done, but it has nothing to do with his play on the field.

Again, of course Dak winning nothing in the first 5 years doesn't mean he never will, but like I already said, I judge my QBs on what they have done and not what they might do in the future. If you pay players for what they MIGHT do in the future as opposed to what they have done so far then you're doing bad business and that's a losing formula. Maybe that's why we've won nothing in a quarter of a century?

So, I answered your stuff now you answer mine. I have a simple question. I want you to prove to me that Dak is better then Kirk Cousins.
 
You have to make the playoffs to go 0-4 in playoff games. Dak is 1-2. I really don't see how bringing up the fact that Manning went to the playoffs 4 of his first 6 season helps in this argument you're trying to make. IF Dak makes it this year then he will have been 3 of his first 6 years. That's less then Manning. Again, comparing Dak to all time greats is so weird, but ok.

You bring up about Manning went on to do this or that, unlike you, I like to look at what Dak has done so far and judge him off that instead of what you HOPE he does in the future. If he starts to win Super Bowls and MVPS then my opinions will change on him, but I'm not living in a fantasy land until then.

Yes, Watson is done, but it has nothing to do with his play on the field.

Again, of course Dak winning nothing in the first 5 years doesn't mean he never will, but like I already said, I judge my QBs on what they have done and not what they might do in the future. If you pay players for what they MIGHT do in the future as opposed to what they have done so far then you're doing bad business and that's a losing formula. Maybe that's why we've won nothing in a quarter of a century?

So, I answered your stuff now you answer mine. I have a simple question. I want you to prove to me that Dak is better then Kirk Cousins.

Your pointless determination to prove Dak is bad is laughable. No one cares. He's the QB of the Dallas Cowboys for the foreseeable future. I can't imagine rooting against my own QB. Do you even enjoy being a fan? Anyone who regularly watches football that has eyes can see that Dak gives the Cowboys the best chance to win and continues to improve each year. Was it his fault the D couldn't cover Aaron Rodgers in the 2016 divisional round? Was it his fault the defenses have been historically bad or mediocre at best? Was it his fault Zeke fumbled against LA in the divisional round? Was it his fault all the times Garrett made terrible coaching decisions? He was on pace to put up historical numbers this year. I know I'm wasting words on you because you do this in every post but it's not Dak's fault you're salty about your crappy life having such a low ceiling.
 
You have to make the playoffs to go 0-4 in playoff games. Dak is 1-2. I really don't see how bringing up the fact that Manning went to the playoffs 4 of his first 6 season helps in this argument you're trying to make. IF Dak makes it this year then he will have been 3 of his first 6 years. That's less then Manning. Again, comparing Dak to all time greats is so weird, but ok.

You bring up about Manning went on to do this or that, unlike you, I like to look at what Dak has done so far and judge him off that instead of what you HOPE he does in the future. If he starts to win Super Bowls and MVPS then my opinions will change on him, but I'm not living in a fantasy land until then.

Yes, Watson is done, but it has nothing to do with his play on the field.

Again, of course Dak winning nothing in the first 5 years doesn't mean he never will, but like I already said, I judge my QBs on what they have done and not what they might do in the future. If you pay players for what they MIGHT do in the future as opposed to what they have done so far then you're doing bad business and that's a losing formula. Maybe that's why we've won nothing in a quarter of a century?

So, I answered your stuff now you answer mine. I have a simple question. I want you to prove to me that Dak is better then Kirk Cousins.
so now you change the narrative of the argument. you said 1-2...so I mentioned, based on your logic 0-4, now you are saying how many years they went to the playoffs...playoff performance be [email protected] that's how you always spin.

and I have never said Dak is Manning, but going 3 out of 6 years, vs. 4 out of 6 years....Manning was an all world QB. 1st overall pick. once in a generation.......again, not comparing but just saying. its not too bad...

and I judge Dak based on what he has done so far as well. unlike you I don't put all wins and losses on his feet. for example, was it his fault the team tied the game against the future HOFer rodgers and then the defense gave up the winning kick? should Dak take that blame? I know you line of reasoning...should have scored earlier. which will have ZERO to do with the game since you can't even claim GB played prevent defense (a defense you Dak haters like to use excessively)........score was 31-31 with a minute to go.....31 is above average...unless you are going to tell me scores in the first quarter count more than 4th quarter (seemingly all you dak haters count that way). Rams game we gave up 250 yards rushing...can you tell me how many teams won games when they gave up 250 yards rushing? I give you a few days to research that one...but hey its Dak's fault for giving up 250 yards rushing....

and based on performance...as you tried to do. again your logic....then watson sucks...he is 1-2 in the playoffs. Brees really sucked because he got dumped by his team and he was 1-1 for the first 7 years of his career. why did NO continue with him? Mathew stafford (another one of your favorites)...I won't even get into him, because its embarassing,

the list way way too long for all the QBs, with similar records in their first 5 years, yet having gone to have success...

and if that record is a good judge of how good a QB, then is Dilfer better than Marino? would you take Flacco over Marino? I mean they both have superbowl rings and playoff success.....

so if not Dak, give us a QB that would be better that we could have. what's the alternative? you complain a lot, but offer no solutions...and don't play fantasy football, I would trade this, do that and blah blah....be realistic....you have offered zero viable solutions providing any logic that would put the team in a better position.....and paaalllleeeeassse dont' mention Dalton, because that alone would lose you that argument instantly....INSTANTLY
 
Talk about cherry picking stats! You picked through 2019 looking for games that the opponents didn't score much AND that we lost. Then you lay 100% of the blame at Dak's feet. How about Zeek never rushing for 100 yards in any of those games? Two of them he didn't even get 50 yards. 18 rushes for 35 yards against New Orleans. 21 for 86 against New England. He went for a whopping 18 for 47 against the Eagles. One of those games Cooper literally just didn't do a thing. Just disappeared. If you've been watching, Cooper just disappears at times.

There were other games where the defense held and the offense was rolling, but you didn't include those while blaming Dak for the losses. If he is the sole reason we lost those games, then he's the sole reason we won those other games. Both of those assumptions are ridiculous.

This is a team sport. Our QB is definitely not our biggest issue. He's one of the bright spots. We have lots of issues. Defense. OL health. Defense. Poor play calling on both sides of the ball. Defense.
he always solely blames the QB for all wins and losses. and in the case of Dak, wins is a team thing. losses are because of him....its the same narrative always
 
Your pointless determination to prove Dak is bad is laughable. No one cares. He's the QB of the Dallas Cowboys for the foreseeable future. I can't imagine rooting against my own QB. Do you even enjoy being a fan? Anyone who regularly watches football that has eyes can see that Dak gives the Cowboys the best chance to win and continues to improve each year. Was it his fault the D couldn't cover Aaron Rodgers in the 2016 divisional round? Was it his fault the defenses have been historically bad or mediocre at best? Was it his fault Zeke fumbled against LA in the divisional round? Was it his fault all the times Garrett made terrible coaching decisions? He was on pace to put up historical numbers this year. I know I'm wasting words on you because you do this in every post but it's not Dak's fault you're salty about your crappy life having such a low ceiling.
Nobody is rooting against Dak, some of us just have realistic expectations for him.
 
so now you change the narrative of the argument. you said 1-2...so I mentioned, based on your logic 0-4, now you are saying how many years they went to the playoffs...playoff performance be [email protected] that's how you always spin.

and I have never said Dak is Manning, but going 3 out of 6 years, vs. 4 out of 6 years....Manning was an all world QB. 1st overall pick. once in a generation.......again, not comparing but just saying. its not too bad...

and I judge Dak based on what he has done so far as well. unlike you I don't put all wins and losses on his feet. for example, was it his fault the team tied the game against the future HOFer rodgers and then the defense gave up the winning kick? should Dak take that blame? I know you line of reasoning...should have scored earlier. which will have ZERO to do with the game since you can't even claim GB played prevent defense (a defense you Dak haters like to use excessively)........score was 31-31 with a minute to go.....31 is above average...unless you are going to tell me scores in the first quarter count more than 4th quarter (seemingly all you dak haters count that way). Rams game we gave up 250 yards rushing...can you tell me how many teams won games when they gave up 250 yards rushing? I give you a few days to research that one...but hey its Dak's fault for giving up 250 yards rushing....

and based on performance...as you tried to do. again your logic....then watson sucks...he is 1-2 in the playoffs. Brees really sucked because he got dumped by his team and he was 1-1 for the first 7 years of his career. why did NO continue with him? Mathew stafford (another one of your favorites)...I won't even get into him, because its embarassing,

the list way way too long for all the QBs, with similar records in their first 5 years, yet having gone to have success...

and if that record is a good judge of how good a QB, then is Dilfer better than Marino? would you take Flacco over Marino? I mean they both have superbowl rings and playoff success.....

so if not Dak, give us a QB that would be better that we could have. what's the alternative? you complain a lot, but offer no solutions...and don't play fantasy football, I would trade this, do that and blah blah....be realistic....you have offered zero viable solutions providing any logic that would put the team in a better position.....and paaalllleeeeassse dont' mention Dalton, because that alone would lose you that argument instantly....INSTANTLY
So, all I see is a wall of excuses and you ignoring my question about Kirk Cousins, so I don't really have anything else to say because this is just me responding to your excuses for Dak and then you ignoring the one simple questions I asked you to answer.
 
I guarantee you that once the games start you'll be rooting for Dak to fail. Book it.
Why would anyone want that? lol

I am a fan of the Cowboys over being a fan of a single player. It seems like a lot you guys aren't happy unless certain players are the ones doing the winning.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,354
Messages
14,532,144
Members
24,210
Latest member
Jtom95
Back
Top