Pessimist_cowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 13,657
- Reaction score
- 16,931
We learned he had the jitters, and by the time he overcame them it was late. And now he's 0-1.
Let's not forget that this is football and injuries happen. There are no guarantees.Ok. I hope your are right. Almost every one of our DBs are going to be UFA in 2017.
So we'll see.
Any game after the rookie season is a choke game IMO, so this first one was a brilliant performance by a rookie.Dak did excellent. However if Romo had the same exact game, we would hear:
Made too many poor throes on 3rd down to settle for FGs;
Should have checked out of 2nd and 1 pass and/or not thrown the horrible pass that was picked;
Choked by spiking the ball;
Put up big stats but didnt get it done.
My point is, QB doesn't matter on this team as long as Garrett and the defense stink.
"But nothing about their defense"
I hate articles like this. Dak and Zeke are amazing. We get it, they get it. Every article needs to be about how AWFUL the D is until they change it.
But he's been doing it all season. He did exactly what I thought he'd do yesterday. Played like a champ.Disagree and thought it was spot-on. Dak was sensational as a rookie but there were still questions about him that needed to be answered. How would he perform when the pressure is ratcheted up? The playoffs and the regular season are two completely different beasts when it comes to pressure. How would he respond in the face of adversity? This was the first time all year we were in a situation where we weren't either in complete control of the game or at least right there with the opponent. Unlike the regular season, Dak didn't have the benefit of being able to throw safe passes all afternoon. Yesterday was really the first opportunity Dak has had to answer these important questions and he came up huge. Honestly, it was probably my favorite game Dak has played because of how he responded when he had to be the man.
I keep saying.
This was our Lions playoff loss from 1991.
I felt like, wait till next year.... but for real!
Seriously? He started out fine. He didn't get the 15 yard penalty, he didn't forget to run EE, and he didn't commit the 12 man penalty.We learned he had the jitters, and by the time he overcame them it was late. And now he's 0-1.
Loved that part.This is the line:
"He was not beaten. He just ran out of time."
There is more to be excited about in this game than in that Lions game from 1991. Look at Aikman's stats in comparison to Dak's. Plus, in that game we were drilled by a QB named Erik Kramer, he was solid, but no Rodgers. Draft well, maybe a key FA and we will be even better next year.
I don't think he neglected the defense. The 2007 defense was good enough to win a championship.JJ squandered Romo's career by neglecting the Def., he can't possibly do it with Dak can he?
Whether you buy into the "championship caliber defense" narrative or not, I don't think Romo ever had a defense that would remotely be considered championship caliber. 2007's defense was good but not great. If you take 2007 out the equation, the defenses on Romo's team as a rule just were not very good.I don't think he neglected the defense. The 2007 defense was good enough to win a championship.
The problem was that we let Romo do everything. Our philosophy ran through Romo NOT the running game. We had the defense in 2007, but we didn't have the patience or philosophy we do now (if we continue to work with got us to the dance and not deviate as we did yesterday).
But we may need a super offense and super defense to overcome this coaching staff because that appears to be the only way we're going to get to the Super Bowl.
Whether you buy into the "championship caliber defense" narrative or not, I don't think Romo ever had a defense that would remotely be considered championship caliber. 2007's defense was good but not great. If you take 2007 out the equation, the defenses on Romo's team as a rule just were not very good.
Neither was the 2007 Giants defense, until they actually won the Super Bowl. Statistically, the Cowboys defense was better that year.
But there's always an excuse for Romo by the same fans who elevate him to the level of Brady, Rodgers, Brees, Peyton Manning, etc. He's not there and not on their level. And he needs everything to be perfect around him for him to take the next step.
If that's the case, he's not all that fans say he is.
Did you see Rodgers' performance yesterday? He played with a defense not as good as ours, statistically, and not a dominant defense. There's no question Rodgers won that game (yes, I know he couldn't do it alone, but HE was the main reason the Packers won). I can look at Brady in the playoffs and Brees and Peyton Manning, and they have elevated their teams to Super Bowl levels. I can't say that for Romo. He needs everything perfect for him to take the next step. And that's why we continuously hear, if Romo had this, if he had that, then he would be a Super Bowl winning quarterback.
He has had the defense and the offense. His teams just weren't able to get it done. That's a part of his history, whether we/he/you like it or not.
I'm not sure there's a ceiling for Dak. As more time goes by, and the more that gets asked of him, the better he gets.
Lol who said that's all that matters?He lost.
I thought that was all that mattered?
