JonJon;2732956 said:
Nope I am perfectly sane. It has already been said that we are moving to a more run-oriented offense and that we will use all three running backs like the Giants did, so why would we give up a great young RB that has produced against the leagues best run defenses,
Because you can find half a dozen of them just about every year.
a great pass blocking TE that works great off of play action and is a threat in the endzone,
Because you can find about a dozen of them just about every year.
and a 2nd round pick for a WR that probably won't get many opportunities? It's just not good business.
Ou contraire, mon ami.
Boldin makes life easier for RW, easier for Witten, easier for the running game and next to Jessica Simpson, a delight for Romo. He's a true posession receiver with absolutely fantastic hands and unquestionable toughness.
Think Michael Irvin on steroids.
The object is to get the running game going and then spread the ball evenly through the passing game. We don't need a Boldin for that. We have our possession receiver (Williams), our slot receiver (Crayton), and our speed receiver (Austin), plus the best TE in the league (Witten). Felix/Barber/Choice are there for dump offs and screens. Boldin would be a nice luxury, but he will not be needed for this offense.
That's a VERY valid argument and, believe me, I'd take that scenario too. However, when an opportunity to obtain a player like Bolden presents itself ( and I'm not saying this is the case, mind you ), you take it.
Bolden's problem ( unlike T.O. ) is not the catches, or the yardage, or the distrubution of passes. His problem is MONEY and Jarrah has plenty of it.
If the Cards are stupid enough to fall for a package like that ( and they're not ), you have to be crazy not to take it.