NewsBot
New Member
- Messages
- 111,281
- Reaction score
- 2,947
lol.......
“We did bring some guys into our team who have had some issues off the field,” Garrett said. “We’ll continue to try to help those guys with those issues. But anybody who has any understanding of the kind of team that we have, I don’t want to start naming names, because I could name 50 guys off the top of my head who are exactly what you want in a football player. We have to make sure that our team is chocked full of those kind of guys and continue to build our team that way.”
Do we really have to go through the charade every time? Make the distinction between character and football character? Explain how every single team in the league has players with substance issues. That some of them, like Scandrick last season, happen to also be guys with great football character? That the fact is, this really is a high character football team as evidenced by the fact that it hung together despite the worst set of setbacks and unexpected changes of fortune in recent memory? I guess we do.
The fact is, character does matter to this club. They try hard to support their players. Even the troubled ones like Randle and Brent. The team gets it. And the team never promised not to take a chance on a guy with a mix of character concerns and real ability. In Jason's own words:
Some of you guys really need to take your foot off the accelerator when it comes to mocking and complaining every little thing that get said in the long offseason. Or, rather, you don't, but it sure would be nice if you considered it.
Do we really have to go through the charade every time? Make the distinction between character and football character? Explain how every single team in the league has players with substance issues. That some of them, like Scandrick last season, happen to also be guys with great football character? That the fact is, this really is a high character football team as evidenced by the fact that it hung together despite the worst set of setbacks and unexpected changes of fortune in recent memory? I guess we do.
The fact is, character does matter to this club. They try hard to support their players. Even the troubled ones like Randle and Brent. The team gets it. And the team never promised not to take a chance on a guy with a mix of character concerns and real ability. In Jason's own words:
Some of you guys really need to take your foot off the accelerator when it comes to mocking and complaining every little thing that get said in the long offseason. Or, rather, you don't, but it sure would be nice if you considered it.
Please. You're as bad as Garrett with trying to have it both ways. Like him, you can't.
Don't care it's football team not a choir or scout troop.
There are 53 guys on a roster. Character is very important to us, but in some cases we'll take a chance on a troubled but very talented football player if we think we can help him. But overall, we want to be very careful to maintain the balance of the locker room.
It's pretty simple. And it's not having it both ways. It just takes an understanding that there are a lot of factors that go into roster decisions, and football character is only one of them.
There are 53 guys on a roster. Character is very important to us, but in some cases we'll take a chance on a troubled but very talented football player if we think we can help him. But overall, we want to be very careful to maintain the balance of the locker room.
It's pretty simple. And it's not having it both ways. It just takes an understanding that there are a lot of factors that go into roster decisions, and football character is only one of them.
If Mickey Spags ever retires you would make an excellent replacement.
It's absolutely having it both ways and it's blatant hypocrisy that's being pointed out by many. The Cowboys value character - right until they don't.
I have no problem with them taking chances on players with questionable character, I'm advocating keeping Hardy. But admit it and stop trying to state otherwise, especially after its just blown up in your face.
I realize you consider that an insult of sorts, but I have no issues with Mickey. He can at least keep competing notions separate and in his head at the same time.
Im right regarding what I'm saying about character, too, for the record.
Sorry stash. It's not. Something can be important without it being the only or the overriding consideration. That's how multi variate analyses work. And building a competitive NFL roster is most definitely a multi variate problem.
In Hardy's case, it sounds like the issues were more than football character issues. Which is why I really wanted him here to begin with, but don't want him back.