Probably more trades this year since a lot of prime free agents are going to be restricted. Also, the top 8 teams are going to have to rely mostly on trades and the draft to improve because of the restrictions. I feel that this year will bring quite afew trades.M'Kevon;3258309 said:Dumb premise. Why cut him - trades do occasionally occur.
Doomsday101;3259251 said:If someone was making an offer for Barber I would at least listen to the offer outside of that no I could not just release him.
Woods;3259286 said:I feel the same way.
I think as a "closer" he could really add a lot to this team.
I just think we're so close to making a legit run for the Super Bowl, and I still think Barber is a quality player (when healthy), and if he's used in the right situation, he adds a different kind of dimension to the offense.
With our RBs, Felix is the home run threat and adds the speed dimension. Choice is a very good back with all-round skills. MBIII is the guy you want to use when you want to play more physical, smash mouth football.
When used properly, these RBs can play any type of football on offense that we want to depending on the opponent.
MichaelWinicki;3259320 said:One of the variables in all this is MB3 himself.
At some point there will be a "Coming to Jesus" meeting between Barber/Phillips/Jones, where Barber will be told that he's no longer the starting RB on this team.
And that may set OK with him OR it may not.
Once you've been the #1 guy, and you're still in your 20's, that you're no longer the #1 guy, you may not take it so well.
Publicly Barber wouldn't say anything about it. Behind the scenes he may say a lot more.
That in itself could propel his exit from the team. It could be something that BOTH sides end up desiring.
I'm just throwing percentages out here, but I'm thinking it's 50/50 that he won't be on the team next year.
juck;3258369 said:I cant believe people are even considering this. Barber is still a beast and remember he wasnt given many carries to get things going.
EPL0c0;3259361 said:WHY is (almost) everybody so intent on ditching the QUALITY DEPTH at the RB position??
With the talent at RB that Dallas has, it shouldn't be a matter of who's starting and who's not. It should be a matter of Jason Garrett being able to scheme and committ to a gameplan that takes full advantage of all 3 of their (different) abilities.
bbgun;3259377 said:Not me. If the choice is between keeping him or releasing him for nothing, I'll go with the former. On the other hand, if releasing him means freeing up $ for potential free agents or trade acquisitions, then I'm all ears.
MichaelWinicki;3259392 said:OR alleviating discontent in the RB ranks.
Let's not kid ourselves; having depth at the running back position isn't the same as having good depth at corner or the offensive line.
I think there is only one thing worse than having not enough talent at RB and that's having too much.
It just doesn't work long-term. I watched the Herschel/Dorsett thing play out and I've seen how it works around the league. Two good running backs is fine & dandy. Three is one too many.
bbgun;3259399 said:Except that the guy everyone wants to elevate to the starter's job (Felix) can't stay healthy. I also wonder how effective Choice will be if he's forced to do more of the heavy lifting. I care about depth, not their bruised egos.
MichaelWinicki;3259403 said:Choice had what 700 attempts and almost 3500 yards in college. Sounds like he can carry the load.
On top of that we've had the rumors already about the Cowboys being interested in drafting another back come April.
Depth is fine & dandy, but you aren't paying a guy $12 mil over the next two years to be either a #2 or worse, the #3.
You may not care about bruised ego's & budgets but they are a fact of life... And they do influence.
bbgun;3259407 said:He also had one concussion for sure and had his bell rung in the Philly playoff game.
But we don't know if that mystery candidate can play.
Yet JJ's prepared to bring RW11 back despite the fact that he's more expensive than Marion and less productive at what he does. Jerry is anything but predictable.
I don't see the parallels to 1986/1987. Dorsett and Walker were alpha studs, whereas the present day backs are more or less interchangeable. Nor have I heard any whispers of discontent.
EPL0c0;3259361 said:WHY is (almost) everybody so intent on ditching the QUALITY DEPTH at the RB position??
With the talent at RB that Dallas has, it shouldn't be a matter of who's starting and who's not. It should be a matter of Jason Garrett being able to scheme and committ to a gameplan that takes full advantage of all 3 of their (different) abilities.
Chief;3258806 said:So true.
People here are way over-estimating his trade value.
I think Jerry will cut him.
And I'm ok with that.
That sounds like a "be careful what you ask for" type of statement.MichaelWinicki;3259413 said:Think what you want, but if Barber goes bye-bye, don't say you haven't been warned.
dbair1967;3259456 said:He definitely has no trade value IMO.
I dont know for sure if he'll be cut, but if he is I'm fine with it. Jones and Choice need to be getting most of the carries now, and we can find a decent 3rd back in the draft.
Of course you wait and see, if we cut him and he goes somewhere and does anything decent, Jones will be ripped left and right for it. Even though cutting him IS the right thing to do IMO.
big dog cowboy;3259460 said:That sounds like a "be careful what you ask for" type of statement.