DFWJC
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 60,238
- Reaction score
- 49,014
Wow. That's optimistic!12-5.
It does start out easy, but the schedule gets tough later.
at CAR
NYJ
PIT
at ATL
LAC
NE
at BAL
CIN
at MIA
at BUF
TB
at HOU
at CIN
BAL
NO
at WAS
at PIT
Wow. That's optimistic!12-5.
bahahahhahaHe just apologized. So, it's OK now?
well, you clearly missed my point when I said UNLESS YOU READ THE REPORT. Do you think every person writing in this thread has taken the time to read that 15 page report?I have no problem with your view but mine is different than yours and maybe it isn’t to deep for most of us.
We are not dealing with criminal justice here you are dealing with a CBA that doesn’t allow this. The criminal justice is failing daily I hope the NFL does the right thing and that’s not a emotional take, it’s the right thing to do.no, it means that I can accept what the actual CRMINAL JUSTICE system says vs a bunch of emotional people that bring their own views and experiences into things.
The NFL is a business. I dont expect Businesses to be the place that sets the tone for all of us. I expect our legislature to be who sets the tone.Isn't the NFL a part of society?
To whom much is given, much is expected.
I guess I did, because I took it that comment was directed at me, my bad if that’s the case, I read it and came away with a different take and that’s ok it’s what keeps the world in balance.well, you clearly missed my point when I said UNLESS YOU READ THE REPORT. Do you think every person writing in this thread has taken the time to read that 15 page report?
And trust me when I say that some people who did read the report will gloss right over some important things in the report.
Just the fact so many people saying how the nfl is so unfair with this punishment shows how little people pay attention to the FACTS.
well thank you for proving my point about being a little too deep for you. Please go find ONE post from me.. just one, where I have said what Watson did was ok.Those were her words, you can jailhouse lawyer all you want and if you think doing what he did to 24 women who filed complaints and him paying them to go away is ok that’s on you and hopefully Goodell appeals this and Watson is out a year and can’t come back untit he gets help for his problems. You do know it’s not ok to force oneself on a women, but then again.
its exactly what I wrote 15 minutes ago... people make crap up to try and make some point. I clearly have never said what Watson did was ok. He can not understand the difference between me tearing this apart and understanding this thing from what happened in the arbitration hearing and his emotional response.I have not seen one single poster say that what he did is OK. Where do you get that from?
If you have no problem with him playing because no charges were brought against him that’s the same as what he did is ok in my opinion. The problem seems to be the issue is too deep for you.well thank you for proving my point about being a little too deep for you. Please go find ONE post from me.. just one, where I have said what Watson did was ok.
my comment about the CJ system had zero to do with Watson's hearing. The "right thing," according to..... you?We are not dealing with criminal justice here you are dealing with a CBA that doesn’t allow this. The criminal justice is failing daily I hope the NFL does the right thing and that’s not a emotional take, it’s the right thing to do.
The league an the union agreed to have arbitrators hear these cases. I take the view that a retired federal judge heard the case. Read THOUSANDS of documents presented by the league and she came to a decision. I am ok with accepting her decision. Had she suspended him for a year, Id be ok with that. Had she said 2 games, Im ok with that. She was hired for a reason. She has far more experience in these things than you, me or Roger Goodell. What I am not ok with is saying yea, this arbitrator is a better way for these situations to be handled. Then when the decisions comes out people are screaming... well this decision sucks, appeal it!If you have no problem with him playing because no charges were brought against him that’s the same as what he did is ok in my opinion. The problem seems to be the issue is too deep for you.
I guess the best way to end this is to agree to disagree.The league an the union agreed to have arbitrators hear these cases. I take the view that a retired federal judge heard the case. Read THOUSANDS of documents presented by the league and she came to a decision. I am ok with accepting her decision. Had she suspended him for a year, Id be ok with that. Had she said 2 games, Im ok with that. She was hired for a reason. She has far more experience in these things than you, me or Roger Goodell. What I am not ok with is saying yea, this arbitrator is a better way for these situations to be handled. Then when the decisions comes out people are screaming... well this decision sucks, appeal it!
Sorry, my good man, but that's a very strange viewpoint. There are many many things that are not OK to do that are not against the law, or if they are, very minor infractions. Different crimes have different degrees of punishment.If someone says the punishment is ok or no criminal charges then no punishment should be given that’s the same as it’s ok imho.
He won't.
He might get suspended if he does......
It's the opposite, dude. The truth appears to be too deep for you.I have no problem with your view but mine is different than yours and maybe it isn’t to deep for most of us.
The right thing for the NFL is what makes them the most money. Once you realize that's the overriding factor here, the case becomes much easier to analyze.We are not dealing with criminal justice here you are dealing with a CBA that doesn’t allow this. The criminal justice is failing daily I hope the NFL does the right thing and that’s not a emotional take, it’s the right thing to do.
Quit being ignorant. YOU SUPPORT ONLY A 6 GAME SUSPENSION BECAUSE YOU CLEARLY APPROVE OF ONLY A 6 GAME SUSPENSION.my comment about the CJ system had zero to do with Watson's hearing. The "right thing," according to..... you?
The NFL is a business. I dont expect Businesses to be the place that sets the tone for all of us. I expect our legislature to be who sets the tone.
The NFL is a league of people that play a very violent sport. Those players come from some varied backgrounds. To hold the NFL to a higher standard than the rest of us is a joke IMO.
Yes, but it doesn't mean it's the morally correct thing to do. Money talks for the NFL, everything else walks. Yet, Badell did not feel that way towards Zeke and a few other players.The right thing for the NFL is what makes them the most money. Once you realize that's the overriding factor here, the case becomes much easier to analyze.
CLEV has a big nasty D and a top 5 ball control RB. They were 8-9 last year w/ terrible QB play. The D was 5th.Wow. That's optimistic!
It does start out easy, but the schedule gets tough later.
at CAR
NYJ
PIT
at ATL
LAC
NE
at BAL
CIN
at MIA
at BUF
TB
at HOU
at CIN
BAL
NO
at WAS
at PIT