ESPN Stats on Romo vs Dak's first 5 games

[JonJon]

To be fair, Dak didn't have the luxury of sitting 3 years first. Btw, I would LOVE to pull some threads from 2006 and read the Bledsoe supporters. I was here

Have fun...

http://cowboyszone.com/threads/czars-blog-bledsoe-or-romo.63946/

http://cowboyszone.com/threads/pft-romo-bouncing-bledsoe.60473/

http://cowboyszone.com/threads/romo-versus-bledsoe.30873/

http://cowboyszone.com/threads/bledsoe-vs-romo-week-2-who-is-the-starter.61188/

http://cowboyszone.com/threads/if-bledsoe-goes-down-are-you-comfortable-with-romo.61013/

 

[LocimusPrime]

9-16

NYG: 2-3
WASH: 3-2
CHI: 1-4
SF: 1-4
CIN: 2-3

Ouch are opponents aren't even near avg as a group, but I'll still takes those Ws

 

[AbeBeta]

For perspective, the combined win / loss opponent records of AFC Favorite Pats and the 5-0 Vikings

Pats: 9-16
Vikes: 11-12

For perspective, those statistics are stupid as losing to us (or the Pats or the Vikes) makes for a worse won-loss record for those teams. Also,we've played the Giants and Washington. They played each other, so no matter what, you've got a loss for one of those teams. The Vikes played one fewer divisional game so they don't have that going on yet. That all evens out at the end of the year but when you look at small samples, they tell you little. The Pats both have the two teams who played each other deal (Bills vs. Az) and the Browns on their schedule. Again, these are things that will even out. Things that don't make no sense to focus on so early.

 

[65fastback2plus2]

To be fair, Dak didn't have the luxury of sitting 3 years first. Btw, I would LOVE to pull some threads from 2006 and read the Bledsoe supporters. I was here

But dak did have the luxury of playing in the SEC...tony didnt

 

[dogunwo]

The statistic shows that Tony Romo burst onto the scene as a revelation, as has Dak.

Tony is responsible for your avatar.