LeonDixson
Illegitimi non carborundum
- Messages
- 12,299
- Reaction score
- 6,808
ZeroClub;2130700 said:Lots of vets have injury issues. Few of them have signed waivers similar to what Glenn is being required to sign. (Can anybody here name 3 other established NFL vets who have signed similar waivers?) Furthermore, Glenn is being required to sign the waiver despite having an existing, current contract.
IMO, Glenn is being treated in a cheesy way.
I'll bet a little research would reveal a lot of injured, aging players who were forced to take a straight reduction in salary if they wanted to remain on the team. At least Jerry is giving Terry the chance to earn his full salary if the knee stays healthy. That doesn't sound cheesy to me. It sounds generous.
Tovya;2130704 said:I think that this is my point as well.
If Glenn were free agent, then I can understand... but he has a current contract with us.
He has played very hard for us, was a team player (even when people said he and T.O. could never co-exist), he never complained or ran his mouth, and he played with some pain in his knees too....
So if for loyalty sake alone, we should stick to the agreement.
I completely understand tearing up and agreement when a player gives your team the finger, refuses to play, or gripes that his CURRENT signed contract is too low. Those kind of players are babies, and they should be cut in many cases.
But this isn't Glenn at all. He has been a model player and model team citizen. By keeping our agreement with him and fulfilling our end of the bargain, it only helps us, because other players see this and realize that unlike other teams, the 'Boys do uphold there end of the bargain and they are loyal to their players...
That only encourages future free agents to come here.
There has been a number of free agents wanting to come to Dallas due to the way Jerry runs the franchise. I don't think this will keep them away.
Alexander;2130729 said:No, he's not.
Most owners would already have cut a player in Glenn's circumstance instead of treating them "in a cheesy way". They'd just be on the street and without a chance of earning another cent.
These types of waivers and reassurances may be commonplace and we just do not hear about them. If not, then Jones is a pioneer. But most owners wouldn't have kept him active all year last season hoping he could come back. And most wouldn't even bother to be haggling with a clearly injured player hoping they could do the same a year later.
Either on the street or taking a reduced contract out of the gate to just be able to play. They wouldn't be given a chance to earn their full salary.
I'm one that wants Terry to play this year. I really like the guy. But I don't think he's being shafted. Especially if his knee is as sound as he's been telling everyone. If it's that good, sign the contract and you'll get your full $1.7 million.