ESPN: There is a better chance Shedeur Sanders could be Cowboys QB next season than Dak

[morat1959]

So if Shedder sanders is a top 3 pick, how do the cowboys draft him without tanking this season and going 3-14? Sounds like fun..........roll eyes.....
ESPN is wrong again.

Sanders will not be nothing more than an average nfl QB at best. He’s all hype.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Dak didn't have anywhere close to a 5 star lineman. Colorado at least has one.

With nobody protecting him, nobody to throw to, and no running back that made the NFL junior league....it's a wonder Dak was able to lead his team to 10 and 9 wins respectively in his last 2 years.

I agree.

 

[Whirlwin]

No, he didn't. He joined a super bowl ready team.

We don’t win without Charles Haley, without Dion, we don’t beat Pittsburgh. Just my opinion.

 

[khiladi]

His team wasn't that good buddy. He played in a much tougher league. It's hard to go up against giants like A&M, Alabama, and LSU when they had the deck all stacked.

It's funny you mention his senior year which sounds just like Shedur last year. Am I rite?

Shedur in his junior year didn't have as good as junior year as Dak did. That's a fair comparison right? Since they were both the same class.

Also, I don't care about release because just having a good release isn't gonna do it in the NFL. What is this stays in the pocket nonsense?

I asked you. Name me one offensive lineman, running back, or WR Dak has to play with? What's your answer buddy?

Man, you and your excuses…

The Buffaloee allowed 56 sacks and were last in RUSHING offense. They were among the worst OL in the nation and they completely rehauled the line this off season. Sanders didn’t even finish the season, he was getting rocked. In Dak’s 10-4 season, his OL only allowed 23 sacks, which is less than half of Colorado. Man just stop capping bruh..

Colorado was also 1-11 the year prior. Dak was the QB of an 8-5 team the previous years. And Dak in his junior year threw 61 % with 11 INTs while Sanders threw close to 70% and only 3 INTs. Outside his 10-3 season which was an anomaly, there was no difference record wise with his teams and those led by other QBs under Mullen.

The SEC is filled with garbage and Miss State beat up on a bunch of other bums. Dak lost to those 3 teams which you act like define the SEC. His teams best up on bad teams. The PAC 12 last year had Washington, Oregon and Arizona, USC, UCLA among others. Acting like the SEC has a way superior to what Sanders faced overall is comical.

Just stop with your narrative Tad..

 

[Whirlwin]

Man, you and your excuses…

The Buffaloee allowed 56 sacks and were last in RUSHING offense. They were among the worst OL in the nation and they completely rehauled the line this off season. Sanders didn’t even finish the season, he was getting rocked.

Colorado was also 1-11 the year prior. Dak was the QB of an 8-5 team the previous years. And Dak in his junior year threw 61 % with 11 INTs while Sanders threw close to 70% and only 3 INTs.

The SEC is filled with garbage and Ole Miss beat up on a bunch of other bums. Dak lost to those 3 teams which you act like define the SEC. His teams best up on bad teams. The PAC 12 last year had Washington, Oregon and Arizona, USC, UCLA among others. Acting like the SEC has a way superior to what Sanders faced overall is comical.

Just stop with your narrative Tad..

Sounds like a familiar story. Beating up on bad teens.

 

[Yobwocs]

Man, you and your excuses…

The Buffaloee allowed 56 sacks and were last in RUSHING offense. They were among the worst OL in the nation and they completely rehauled the line this off season. Sanders didn’t even finish the season, he was getting rocked.

Colorado was also 1-11 the year prior. Dak was the QB of an 8-5 team the previous years. And Dak in his junior year threw 61 % with 11 INTs while Sanders threw close to 70% and only 3 INTs.

The SEC is filled with garbage and Ole Miss beat up on a bunch of other bums. Dak lost to those 3 teams which you act like define the SEC. His teams best up on bad teams. The PAC 12 last year had Washington, Oregon and Arizona, USC, UCLA among others. Acting like the SEC has a way superior to what Sanders faced overall is comical.

Just stop with your narrative Tad..

We're playing the PAC 12 is actually on the SEC's level....now? Damn.

Dak has to face Alabama, Auburn, LSU, sometimes Florida and Georgia. Those are teams that have won the national championship in the last 15 years. Yes, a lesser team is usually gonna lose to them.

But really now lol. What chances do you give the PAC 12 of beating the SEC in the playoffs in a game that matters?

But that's all irrelevant. Dak was excellent his junior year. He was in the Heisman conversation, went 10-3 beating all good teams, but lost the key game against Alabama 25-20. Id say Dak had a better year than Sanders.

If the Bufs still have offensive line issues this year it's their fault. Because Dak had way less talent on offense...but thats also not mentioning he was sacked combined 16 times in 2 games vs Ole Miss and Alabama his senior year. If Bufs have a bad OLine, Dak's is just as bad.

Continue with your anti Dak bias tho. You'll even go as far as to say Sanders had a better junior year than Dak LMAO

 

[khiladi]

We're playing the PAC 12 is actually on the SEC's level....now? Damn.

Dak has to face Alabama, Auburn, LSU, sometimes Florida and Georgia. Those are teams that have won the national championship in the last 15 years. Yes, a lesser team is usually gonna lose to them.

But really now lol. What chances do you give the PAC 12 of beating the SEC in the playoffs in a game that matters?

But that's all irrelevant. Dak was excellent his junior year. He was in the Heisman conversation, went 10-3 beating all good teams, but lost the key game against Alabama 25-20. Id say Dak had a better year than Sanders.

If the Bufs still have offensive line issues this year it's their fault. Because Dak had way less talent on offense...but thats also not mentioning he was sacked combined 16 times in 2 games vs Ole Miss and Alabama his senior year. If Bufs have a bad OLine, Dak's is just as bad.

Continue with your anti Dak bias tho. You'll even go as far as to say Sanders had a better junior year than Dak LMAO

LOL..

1. We are talking about when Dak was playing buddy. Not where the SEC is now.

2. Dak’s 10-3 record against “ranked teams” were all when he played them to start the season. All of them pretty much ended up not even ranked. In his Senior year, he didn’t beat a single ranked team buddy and got blown out by every one. The Alabama game you are quoting from his Heisman year, that’s cute, but you conveniently fail to mention that he threw a TD with like a minute left in garbage time.

3. So now you admit Colorado had a garbage line last year, but somehow you say if they don’t have one this year it’s their fault. Not sure how that correlates to Dak’s teams not anywhere near the bottom in terms of OL play in college.

Got it Tad..

 

[Yobwocs]

LOL..

1. We are talking about when Dak was playing buddy. Not where the SEC is now.

2. Dak’s 10-3 record against “ranked teams” were all when he played them to start the season. All of them pretty much ended up not even ranked. In his Senior year, he didn’t beat a single ranked team buddy and got blown out by every one. The Alabama game you are quoting from his Heisman year, that’s cute, but you conveniently fail to mention that he threw a TD with like a minute left in garbage time.

3. So now you admit Colorado had a garbage line last year, but somehow you say if they don’t have one this year it’s their fault. Not sure how that correlates to Dak’s teams not anywhere near the bottom in terms of OL play in college.

Got it Tad..

I never heard anyone say the SEC was weak in 2014 and 2015 when Dak was playing. The winners of national championship was Ohio St and Alabama. Alabama was stronger then than they are now. If anything, that Alabama team last year was one of their weaker ones. So we can argue the SEC might be weaker now? It's Georgia..and everyone else...right?

Well 25-13. Whatever. It doesn't matter if he threw a garbage time Touchdown. That's not a bad score line to lose against Alabama who is superior in every facet.

How's 16 combined sacks against Alabama and Ole Miss his senior year? That's bad offensive line play, but you'll conveniently leave that out.

 

[khiladi]

I never heard anyone say the SEC was weak in 2014 and 2015 when Dak was playing. The winners of national championship was Ohio St and Alabama. Alabama was stronger then than they are now. If anything, that Alabama team last year was one of their weaker ones. So we can argue the SEC might be weaker now? It's Georgia..and everyone else...right?

Well 25-13. Whatever. It doesn't matter if he threw a garbage time Touchdown. That's not a bad score line to lose against Alabama who is superior in every facet.

How's 16 combined sacks against Alabama and Ole Miss his senior year? That's bad offensive line play, but you'll conveniently leave that out.

1. You named 3 ranked teams in the SEC and Dak lost to all of them. He only best up the bad teams in the SEC. And like I said, Dak’s career in Mississippi State is pretty much no different than any of the teams there under Mullen record wise. You acting like Dak carried bums is just a made up narrative. On other other hand, Colorado was among the nations worse in pass protection and the worst in running. Sanders was in the negatives in terms of yards rushing because of all the sacks he was taking.

2. 23 sacks his “Heisman” year which you are using as the de facto standard of his “greatness” and Dak carrying them. He was sacked 32 times in his Senior year, still over 20 times less than Colorado. Further, As every draft scouting report said, Dak’s pocket presence went to trash his senior year especially when he panics. Of course we know what that is about, when he panics he runs into his own linemen and into others.

 

[Yobwocs]

1. You named 3 ranked teams in the SEC and Dak lost to all of them. He only best up the bad teams in the SEC. And like I said, Dak’s career in Mississippi State is pretty much no different than any of the teams there under Mullen record wise. You acting like Dak carried bums is just a made up narrative. On other other hand, Colorado was among the nations worse in pass protection and the worst in running. Sanders was in the negatives in terms of yards rushing because of all the sacks he was taking.

2. 23 sacks his “Heisman” year which you are using as the de facto standard of his “greatness” and Dak carrying them. He was sacked 32 times in his Senior year, still over 20 times less than Colorado. Further, As every draft scouting report said, Dak’s pocket presence went to trash his senior year especially when he panics. Of course we know what that is about, when he panics he runs into his own linemen and into others.

Dak is 4-2 against Texas A&M, LSU, and Auburn in 2014-2015....... Teams that out recruit Mississippi State. He's going up pretty much always against superior teams in talent and he still yields a superior record against them. If you add Alabama, Dak is 4-4. Those are all the good teams he's played his junior and senior year.

Also, didn't he crush Lamar Jackson in his bowl game for his very last college game ever? Or am I getting old?

Doesn't sound like he beats only bad teams or thats just your MADE UP narrative.

Sanders having negative rushing yards lmao is a flattering compliment for a Sanders guy like you LMAO.

He has negative rushing yards because he doesn't run as well as Dak. Lol. Thanks for running into that one. Dak has over 2500 rushing yards his career, 3rd highest ever in the SEC for a QB. Maybe Dak is just a better runner. Lol.

Also you're forgetting a main thing. His defense IS always BAD against great teams....in both college and NFL. That's the story of his career so far. Look....

 

[kskboys]

We don’t win without Charles Haley, without Dion, we don’t beat Pittsburgh. Just my opinion.

We beat Pitt w/o Deion if Jerry doesn't start letting players walk w/ a poor replacement plan. Poor drafting and no plan is what sunk us.

Haley was necessary.

 

[cowboyed]

Jerry does like his shiny toys and potential jersey sales….

But he complains about the high cost hair replacement in his toupe that comes from yaks grazing on the Tibetan plateau.

 

[cowboyed]

Is Shedeur's first name French for cheddar?

 

[khiladi]

Dak is 4-2 against Texas A&M, LSU, and Auburn in 2014-2015....... Teams that out recruit Mississippi State. He's going up pretty much always against superior teams in talent and he still yields a superior record against them. If you add Alabama, Dak is 4-4. Those are all the good teams he's played his junior and senior year.

Also, didn't he crush Lamar Jackson in his bowl game for his very last college game ever? Or am I getting old?

Doesn't sound like he beats only bad teams or thats just your MADE UP narrative.

Sanders having negative rushing yards lmao is a flattering compliment for a Sanders guy like you LMAO.

He has negative rushing yards because he doesn't run as well as Dak. Lol. Thanks for running into that one. Dak has over 2500 rushing yards his career, 3rd highest ever in the SEC for a QB. Maybe Dak is just a better runner. Lol.

Also you're forgetting a main thing. His defense IS always BAD against great teams....in both college and NFL. That's the story of his career so far. Look....

1. You just keep repeating the same nonsense. I already told you that in 2014 Mississippi State beat ranked teams in the beginning of the season, meaning they were no indicator of the actual quality of the opponent. LSU consider 8-5 and was 4-4 in the conference. Auburn the same and Texas A&M 8-5, but ended 3-5 in the conference. Mississippi State finished the season going 1-3, there only won against Vanderbilt who they beat 51-0, who had an 0-8 record in the conference. All 3 of the wins were in weeks 4, 5, 6.

2. In 2015, they didn’t even beat a single ranked team thus time around, getting beaten by LSU, destroyed by Texas A&M and only beat Auburn, who ended up even worse than the year prior at 7-6 and 2-6 in the conference.

The point being, this claim Dak has been owning the SEC and a tough division is a farce. He played when it was mediocre, his wins were against mediocre teams, and the average wins with Dak under the helm were pretty much the same with any QB with Dan Mullen as HC. Imagine claiming he brought the school to “glory” based on this.

3. Hey buddy, SACK YARDAGE in college football counts as negative RUN yardage. You missed point about Sanders OL being trash, which doesn’t surprise me. As far as Dak, the offense was built on him with the QB option and running, which I already stated long ago. So your claim about the OL being in Sanders favor is a farce. And we’ve seen how much Dak’s running has translated on the the field in the NFL and where it has gotten him…

4. Buddy, I don’t think that chart proves what you think it means. Dallas PPG average is around 34-35, meaning it disappears when he plays good teams. So Dak has trouble going toe to toe with legit QBs. Further, those scores against the playoff teams are obfuscated by the butt whooping he took against the 49ers, Packers and Bills. If you don’t count the meaningless garbage time points against the Packers, Dak basically only averaged around 8-9 points per game against good teams. Even if the Dallas defense held to 20, they would still have lost, because the dude sucks.

 

[Sydla]

1) I have no issues moving on from Dak

2) I want no part of Sanders

 

[KingCorcoran]

1) I have no issues moving on from Dak

2) I want no part of Sanders

I think you’re taking the narrow view. Someone has to play quarterback next season. Sanders is as good a candidate as any.

 

[Whirlwin]

We beat Pitt w/o Deion if Jerry doesn't start letting players walk w/ a poor replacement plan. Poor drafting and no plan is what sunk us.

Haley was necessary.

He caught that 50 yard bomb or whatever it was from Troy Aikman

 

[Whirlwin]

We beat Pitt w/o Deion if Jerry doesn't start letting players walk w/ a poor replacement plan. Poor drafting and no plan is what sunk us.

Haley was necessary.

You’re just upset with Jerry, and I understand that. But make no mistake about it. Dion definitely help this team win a ring.

 

[Sydla]

I think you’re taking the narrow view. Someone has to play quarterback next season. Sanders is as good a candidate as any.

He’s overrated and he’s bringing a circus to town with him.

No thanks.

 

[cald0d30s0]

I wonder how was the meeting before that TV program.

Hey you… you will be saying something really really stupid, so people will get mad and talk about this dead tv program, ok?