Stats don't tell you a lot of things but how can a guy be the most productive passer ever and be inaccurate? If true, imagine how good he would be if he improved.
Dak is considered accurate according to his "stats"
I have always said "context" is paramount regarding any analysis. Of course Dak is inaccurate and inconsistent. His stats are largely long hand offs & wide open completions.
Lol, Dak made some bigtime throws on 3rd down which were not long hand offs.
Yes, he makes some good throws but his stats are big time padded by the ones I mentioned.
I am not saying they are close talent wise. But you are using stats to justify one player being accurate while using the same stats to say one isnt. It doesnt make sense. There is no context. Herbert has been sailing passes since he came into the league. Plain and simple. I thought KM having a "real" QB was going to set the league on fire. Hows that going?
They didn't play "lights out" against the Chargers. They got lucky that Herbert was overthrowing wide open receivers, two of which were likely TDs.
They looked better than the offense.
That "tush push" was awful. Our guys looked like they were holding Dak back, not shoving him forward. They really need to practice that
Seems like we are going in circles. I have always been very clear that stats are not what I base my opinions on. I guess I did bring them into this discussion by saying he has been historically productive. Although. in my mind. it was secondary proof of my direct observation.
dak likes eating pintos before each game and the guys didn't want to get too close. /shrugs
Seems like he can rack up numbers, but not when it counts.
