juckie;2200313 said:which will be like 5 times remember this,He should have been a WR we didnt need a tight end.Dumb move IMO
juckie;2200329 said:Its dire we get a WR now.
adbutcher;2200333 said:No it is not dire. We will be ok and furthermore no WR taken in the first round of this years draft would have made an impact.
Don't buy into the Martellus negativity and don't be surprised if he turns into a very good pro.
adbutcher;2200319 said:Huh? Did we truly need a thread for this?
Doomsday101;2200347 said:What I see is a young very athletic TE who is an excellent blocker and I think will be with us for a good while.
Rack;2200346 said:The ignore feature is a great thing.
Don't blame me amigo. I curse that albatross too. I tried to quit and if they had let me, I would have pushed the limits of Ignore.adbutcher;2200359 said:Another negative aspect of being a mod, you can't ignore anyone. Those are the things they don't tell you about...thanks Hos.
juckie;2200351 said:We dont need a TE tho,maybe the worst move in a while by the Front office.Reminds me of the Mavs.
juckie;2200351 said:We dont need a TE tho,maybe the worst move in a while by the Front office.Reminds me of the Mavs.
Hostile;2200360 said:Don't blame me amigo. I curse that albatross too. I tried to quit and if they had let me, I would have pushed the limits of Ignore.
Hostile;2200345 said:It won't be Chris Henry.
:money:
juckie;2200313 said:which will be like 5 times remember this,He should have been a WR we didnt need a tight end.Dumb move IMO
And this draft was *so* rich in WRs...juckie;2200313 said:which will be like 5 times remember this,He should have been a WR we didnt need a tight end.Dumb move IMO