Evidently Others LIke Hatcher

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,506
Reaction score
17,339
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
football%20052.jpg


Fox Sports

Dallas Cowboys: Jason Hatcher, DE, Grambling State: There's no such thing as too much depth on the defensive line, Part 2: Hatcher is a 280-pounder who registered 11 sacks in his senior season. He's still very raw, but he joins Marcus Spears, Greg Ellis, Chris Canty and others in a very deep defensive end rotation in Dallas.
 

SMCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,439
Reaction score
26
TwoDeep3 said:
football%20052.jpg


Fox Sports

Dallas Cowboys: Jason Hatcher, DE, Grambling State: There's no such thing as too much depth on the defensive line, Part 2: Hatcher is a 280-pounder who registered 11 sacks in his senior season. He's still very raw, but he joins Marcus Spears, Greg Ellis, Chris Canty and others in a very deep defensive end rotation in Dallas.

two deep, the problem is that most of the people on this board are cry babies that think that they know more about these players than the guys that do this for a living.
 

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,506
Reaction score
17,339
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
SMCowboy said:
two deep, the problem is that most of the people on this board are cry babies that think that they know more about these players than the guys that do this for a living.

This is from another poster in another thread.

I think it speaks for itself.

I could easily see our team being better off over the past ten years with Silverbear or AdamJ13 calling the shots. Its hard not to. We haven't won Jack. zip. nada. nothing in a decade. Thats pretty abysmal. I will never blindly trust Jerry until he can prove that he can win a playoff game without Jimmy's Players.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
TwoDeep3 said:
This is from another poster in another thread.

I think it speaks for itself.

I agree. That is without question one of the most truly ignorant comments ever posted on this board.
 

CrazyCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,287
Reaction score
440
I saw his highlights and it was impressive watching go sideline running down backs.
 

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
21,218
Reaction score
24,066
You cant really blame fans for their reactions on pics like this.
The draft has become as important and popular as any major sporting event, and expectations seem to be more name related based on familiarity.
Players that fans have heard of through the media, they can identify with them because of this familiarity aspect.
When a guy like Hatchers' name is called for our 3rd round selection,, thats right out of left field, very few even know of him, and the negative reaction ensues.
People want to hear a Ko Simpson, or Max Jean Giles,, a familiar name, not necessarily a better player.
 

NorthTexan95

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,463
Reaction score
2,482
Typhus said:
You cant really blame fans for their reactions on pics like this.
The draft has become as important and popular as any major sporting event, and expectations seem to be more name related based on familiarity.
Players that fans have heard of through the media, they can identify with them because of this familiarity aspect.
When a guy like Hatchers' name is called for our 3rd round selection,, thats right out of left field, very few even know of him, and the negative reaction ensues.
People want to hear a Ko Simpson, or Max Jean Giles,, a familiar name, not necessarily a better player.

:signmast: I'm with you on this.
 

twa

Active Member
Messages
1,053
Reaction score
0
NorthTexan95 said:
:signmast: I'm with you on this.

Yep...too many of them are like...OMG he's not even listed in my draftguide :laugh2:
 

Gaede

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,165
Reaction score
14,127
The player looks good and a nice risk, for sure. He looked huge, fast and mean from NFLN highlights..

But I don't like the focus on the position.
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,405
Reaction score
7,932
SMCowboy said:
two deep, the problem is that most of the people on this board are cry babies that think that they know more about these players than the guys that do this for a living.

no - the problem is when *we* (the less than happy) voice our opinion, we're reduced to "you don't know what they know!!!!" crap by fans who can't arugue for the pick on their own, so they have to claim ignorance as a wonderful thing and blindly follow the man waving the magic wand.

look people - this is a message board. of which people will agree, disagree, and argue from time time as well. we're *ALL* fans (with the rare exception of a few gifted posters) and as such gather here to talk about the good and the bad. where we agree and the long theads are usually where we don't.

this isn't some 'happyland' where we all sing kumbaya and blindly praise the management for knowing so much of what they're doing. this is the real world where football has a lot of attention and people with passionate ideas about how it should be played.

THAT is the fun of being a "lowly fan".

if your best answer is "trust in bill" fine, you do that. YOU do that. those of us who don't trust and want to discuss what's up and so forth will.

you wanna wear your 'boys underoos and blindly support "the management" you do that. but it gets real old for you and others to expect all fans to do the same. even older for the "blind homers" to call those who do disagree rather vocally 'stupid fans'.

as for "those who do this for a living" - great. but that doesn't make them infallible of we'd have a 32-way tie for the superbowl, wouldn't we? some are better than others, and some just suck. we've had some bad ones too and only time will tell if this is more bad, or really the way back up.

let's let time call people fools, ok? not each other.
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,405
Reaction score
7,932
Typhus said:
You cant really blame fans for their reactions on pics like this.
The draft has become as important and popular as any major sporting event, and expectations seem to be more name related based on familiarity.
Players that fans have heard of through the media, they can identify with them because of this familiarity aspect.
When a guy like Hatchers' name is called for our 3rd round selection,, thats right out of left field, very few even know of him, and the negative reaction ensues.
People want to hear a Ko Simpson, or Max Jean Giles,, a familiar name, not necessarily a better player.

fair enough way of looking at it. but then, many people want to hear "their" favorite name also, not just "a" favorite. while those people *can* be annoying it's part of the game. i suppose "hush and have blind faith" is part of it also but for *that* side to pretend they're not just as annoying cause they're putting a positive spin on things...
 

jsd27

New Member
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
iceberg said:
no - the problem is when *we* (the less than happy) voice our opinion, we're reduced to "you don't know what they know!!!!" crap by fans who can't arugue for the pick on their own, so they have to claim ignorance as a wonderful thing and blindly follow the man waving the magic wand.

look people - this is a message board. of which people will agree, disagree, and argue from time time as well. we're *ALL* fans (with the rare exception of a few gifted posters) and as such gather here to talk about the good and the bad. where we agree and the long theads are usually where we don't.

this isn't some 'happyland' where we all sing kumbaya and blindly praise the management for knowing so much of what they're doing. this is the real world where football has a lot of attention and people with passionate ideas about how it should be played.

THAT is the fun of being a "lowly fan".

if your best answer is "trust in bill" fine, you do that. YOU do that. those of us who don't trust and want to discuss what's up and so forth will.

you wanna wear your 'boys underoos and blindly support "the management" you do that. but it gets real old for you and others to expect all fans to do the same. even older for the "blind homers" to call those who do disagree rather vocally 'stupid fans'.

as for "those who do this for a living" - great. but that doesn't make them infallible of we'd have a 32-way tie for the superbowl, wouldn't we? some are better than others, and some just suck. we've had some bad ones too and only time will tell if this is more bad, or really the way back up.

let's let time call people fools, ok? not each other.



AWSOME POST. Couldn't have said it better. My question is this, if OUR management is so great, where are all the playoff wins??!!! This is a poor draft so far but we can still help our Oline and pass coverage in the second day and that's what I ecpect our "barintrust" to do.
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,405
Reaction score
7,932
jsd27 said:
AWSOME POST. Couldn't have said it better. My question is this, if OUR management is so great, where are all the playoff wins??!!! This is a poor draft so far but we can still help our Oline and pass coverage in the second day and that's what I ecpect our "barintrust" to do.

this draft has more ? than we've seen in recent times. and for some reason we're still stuck on fixing a great defense and ignoring an aging offense. fasano, great. but hardly a need.

as for the OL, sure you can find "steals" late, but it's harder and look at what our "braintrust" has done to the OL. it sucks. it's riddled with 30+ players and underachievers and despite valid opportunities to upgrade it, we choose to leave it alone and hope it gels and doesn't bite us in the arse.

i'm just an ignorant lowly fan who's too stupid to know better, but this OL has the potential to remind us quite a bit of our last year failures and we did NOT seriously address it as a need - we just gave it some minor love and moved on.
 

maxsports

Member
Messages
582
Reaction score
0
This is a poor draft so far but we can still help our Oline and pass coverage in the second day and that's what I ecpect our "barintrust" to do.

It is a poor draft in your mind. I think thus far it is a solid draft. Fasano helps our oline tremendously!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A 2 tight end set with a tight end that can block like hime will keep Bledsoe standing longer.
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,405
Reaction score
7,932
maxsports said:
It is a poor draft in your mind. I think thus far it is a solid draft. Fasano helps our oline tremendously!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A 2 tight end set with a tight end that can block like hime will keep Bledsoe standing longer.

just what we need, an excuse for bledsoe to hold onto the ball longer.
 

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,506
Reaction score
17,339
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
iceberg said:
no - the problem is when *we* (the less than happy) voice our opinion, we're reduced to "you don't know what they know!!!!" crap by fans who can't arugue for the pick on their own, so they have to claim ignorance as a wonderful thing and blindly follow the man waving the magic wand.

look people - this is a message board. of which people will agree, disagree, and argue from time time as well. we're *ALL* fans (with the rare exception of a few gifted posters) and as such gather here to talk about the good and the bad. where we agree and the long theads are usually where we don't.

this isn't some 'happyland' where we all sing kumbaya and blindly praise the management for knowing so much of what they're doing. this is the real world where football has a lot of attention and people with passionate ideas about how it should be played.

THAT is the fun of being a "lowly fan".

if your best answer is "trust in bill" fine, you do that. YOU do that. those of us who don't trust and want to discuss what's up and so forth will.

you wanna wear your 'boys underoos and blindly support "the management" you do that. but it gets real old for you and others to expect all fans to do the same. even older for the "blind homers" to call those who do disagree rather vocally 'stupid fans'.

as for "those who do this for a living" - great. but that doesn't make them infallible of we'd have a 32-way tie for the superbowl, wouldn't we? some are better than others, and some just suck. we've had some bad ones too and only time will tell if this is more bad, or really the way back up.

let's let time call people fools, ok? not each other.

Everything you say makes so much sense until you shine the light of truth on it.

Two years ago our draft was heralded as one of the top drafts because we traded down and received a second and a fifth to take our first the next year.

We took..

Julius Jones - a player who may be on his last chance with this club. Reports are that we were in hot discussions with the Jets to trade Julius if all the linebackers were gone and we could only get a running back.

Jacob Rogers - flat out bust.

Stephen Peterman - when our line sucked last year, this player could not get on the field.

Bruce Thornton - not on the team

Sean Ryan - back up and special teamer

Nathan Jones - back up and special teamer

Patrick Crayton - slot receiver..maybe the best player taken

Jacques Reeves - back up and special teamer

The press gave us an A-. Boards were rejoicing as if we hit the lottery.

How does that draft look now?

Or the Roy Williams draft where we took 9 players and only two remain.

While this underscores your point. It also makes a quite clear point that you cannot judge a draft, or give it any kind of accurate ranking - BEFORE THE DRAFT IS EVEN OVER!

Because both those drafts received an A from the fans and press alike.

So while I read the comments about players and wonder if they can live up to the potential. Or ask if we paid too much.

I cannot agree with someone who is totally negative and raining on everyone's parade just because you don't recognize the name of the third round pick.

And looking at posts here and on other boards, I see guys like Eddie who highjack those threads and litter them with put downs about the players, coaches, management and other posters because their player wasn't chosen.

I have no clue. But I am not going to waste my time typing tons of negative rebuttal when I don't know.

Just like you don't know, ice.

You only surmize, just like the rest of us.

And in Joe Fan parlance, that means you put your pants on one leg at a time.

Just like the rest of us, my friend.
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,405
Reaction score
7,932
not sure where we disagree two-deep.

i just hate it when "fans" think the complainers are blind and stupid when in reality the moves just don't make sense *to us* and we talk through it.

i've learned a lot this way, i've had to agree to disagree a lot this way. but i've NEVER run back to "neener neener in bill we trust!" as an answer to a debate.

as for the 'light of truth' - heh, clever. but what i said is still true enough to me for the reasons i stated.
 

scottsp

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,936
Reaction score
941
iceberg said:
no - the problem is when *we* (the less than happy) voice our opinion, we're reduced to "you don't know what they know!!!!" crap by fans who can't arugue for the pick on their own, so they have to claim ignorance as a wonderful thing and blindly follow the man waving the magic wand.

look people - this is a message board. of which people will agree, disagree, and argue from time time as well. we're *ALL* fans (with the rare exception of a few gifted posters) and as such gather here to talk about the good and the bad. where we agree and the long theads are usually where we don't.

this isn't some 'happyland' where we all sing kumbaya and blindly praise the management for knowing so much of what they're doing. this is the real world where football has a lot of attention and people with passionate ideas about how it should be played.

THAT is the fun of being a "lowly fan".

if your best answer is "trust in bill" fine, you do that. YOU do that. those of us who don't trust and want to discuss what's up and so forth will.

you wanna wear your 'boys underoos and blindly support "the management" you do that. but it gets real old for you and others to expect all fans to do the same. even older for the "blind homers" to call those who do disagree rather vocally 'stupid fans'.

as for "those who do this for a living" - great. but that doesn't make them infallible of we'd have a 32-way tie for the superbowl, wouldn't we? some are better than others, and some just suck. we've had some bad ones too and only time will tell if this is more bad, or really the way back up.

let's let time call people fools, ok? not each other.


Great stuff, ice. There are people on both sides of this who get a bit too sensitive. As you said, we are fans; this is what we do. As passionate as we might be about this organization (or football in general), it would be wise to take most of this with a grain of salt.

After all, we miss Larry Lacewell. He did this sort of thing for a living. A long time, he did. :p
 

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,506
Reaction score
17,339
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
iceberg said:
not sure where we disagree two-deep.

i just hate it when "fans" think the complainers are blind and stupid when in reality the moves just don't make sense *to us* and we talk through it.

i've learned a lot this way, i've had to agree to disagree a lot this way. but i've NEVER run back to "neener neener in bill we trust!" as an answer to a debate.

as for the 'light of truth' - heh, clever. but what i said is still true enough to me for the reasons i stated.

I don't believe you are blind or stupid.

I think you are complaining about something you can't possibly know until the results are in.

It's like going to the doctor to see if you have VD.

They draw blood and go do some tests.

You may surmize you have it or don't.

But until you have immutable facts, you are just speculating.

Which is what the ranters seem to do alot.

That wouldn't be so bad, in and of itself. If it also didn't come with the bonus of telling people like me who are hopeful that the draft completely sucked and all the players we got are busts.

Before they take a snap.

You may not do this.

But look at some past pages from yesterday and see the litany of bile spewed from a position of authority by people who haven't the foggiest of an indea what is and what isn't.

Like your comment on offensive linemen chosen by Parcells.

What happened yesterday does not neccessarily dictate what will happen tomorrow in this game.

Or the Colts would have won it all.
 
Top