Explain to me how that wasn't a 'football move' **Bryant Reversed Call Thread**

A player can control the ball, land with not one, not two but THREE steps, dive, land on his elbow before a ball comes loose that never hits the ground can be ruled incomplete?

I'm there with ya brother. So many people are assuming something that did not happen. I'm sick over this....SICK.
 
The ball did touch the ground when his arm was extended...

Other than that, I can't explain it, except to say, NFL officiating.
 
A player can control the ball, land with not one, not two but THREE steps, dive, land on his elbow before a ball comes loose that never hits the ground can be ruled incomplete?

it can't be done.

that was the worst call i have ever seen -- topping only the fail mary call by the replacement refs.
 
He had complete control over it, had multiple limbs land on the ground, and then made a football move to extend the ball towards the endzone.

Just insanity. I get it. I understand the rule, but that was so obviously a catch that it makes me sick to my stomach.
 
It's pretty technical. There is a difference between control and possession if you are going to the ground -- if going to the ground, the steps don't matter; rather, you have to complete the catch through your fall, or make a "football move." Of course, the counterargument is that Dez's stretch is a "football move."
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,582
Messages
14,546,739
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top