phildadon86
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,552
- Reaction score
- 32,318
Overall, I'm pleased with the draft but the debate between these two players is still bothering. I'm not confident that the Cowboys allocated their resources properly here. We could have had Lamar Miller for less money and used the 4th pick somewhere else, most likely on Ramsey. Granted, Miller is a few years older but he's a known commodity and also considered a "complete back" just like Elliott. We all agree that both players would improve our run game from last year but is the difference between Elliott and Miller worth a Jalen Ramsey and $11 million dollars? What do you guys think? I don't have a strong stance on this so I'm open to some convincing.
Elliott (21 yrs old) - 4 yrs/$25 million (fully guaranteed)
or
Miller (25 yrs old) - 4 yrs/$26 million (14M guaranteed) + Jalen Ramsey or another player at #4
ID rather commit the money to a guy who knows where he plays. Ramsey isnt a corner, i dont care what he says. You dont allocate that kind of money to a guy who isnt very good at his position, and also has said he doesnt want to play safety.