- Messages
- 101,174
- Reaction score
- 110,306
If???if Robinson is gone
If???if Robinson is gone
If???
There will be a group of players BPA in the fourth or fifth. Our depth at S says take another position unless somehow that S is just clearly head and shoulders better than every other position we could take. Fourth or fifth (just for example), I'd take a kicker over a safety, and I don't want to take a kicker in the fourth.If a S is BPA at #4 or #5 pick, you give it strong consideration. Bell and Coyle and others are still really unknown at S, and as I mentioned, the 2 expiring contracts.
Not true. Taco was BPA.That is just it, you don’t know. You make the best selection at the time as to what you think is right to help the most.
However when Taco was selected they did not go BPA, They went for need more so.
Now with McClay, they lean more towards BPA Regardless.
Really? Why is that? Too fast?If he slips to our pick you look at him like Smokey looked at the big girl in Friday. Right past him
Lol.........he's good but not good enough to draft when not needed. Will McDonald is someone not needed but you don't pass up not branchReally? Why is that? Too fast?
About the same interest they showed in lamb before the draft.Has Dallas shown any interest in Gibbs?
I don’t think I’ve ever read a coherent sentence from you on this board.consider, maybe but again some safety's wing in the wings and another draft for 24.. they would take up a roster space for non need now..so im out don't draft any safety's..also NO DEs and really rather pass on a TE but if Dynamic cant miss projected generational TE comes to us , MAYBE, but im thinki g2023 is were we should be filling holes for.
When the line does its job, the guys behind them can make plays.Safety is the least of my concerns.
Dallas needs a playmaker with their first pick.
If they choose to pick a offensive lineman like Wright from Tennessee I’d be ok with that too.
Dallas lucked out on Micah Parsons. Dallas drafted him to be a linebacker.I think you are missing the point.
I get it, you don’t want to take a S regardless if he is head and shoulders better than a DT that is there, but may be a bust or sit the bench. Because we need to see what the players have in front of him. That is the theory I am getting you have. Go for need.
What if the next Micah Parsons is there. Would you pass because you don’t think you need another elite pass rusher. And you take a lesser player at another position?
Well, not what I'm hearing, but OK.Lol.........he's good but not good enough to draft when not needed. Will McDonald is someone not needed but you don't pass up not branch
Stopped trying.I don’t think I’ve ever read a coherent sentence from you on this board.
thats what i said LOLThis roster definitely needs more corners than safeties.
Might be a couple of UDFA safeties brought in but other than an outright steal dropping in their laps, there will be no safety drafted, deepest position on this entire roster .
I'm more pumped about our SS position than FS. I'm not sure if we have a deep center fielder we can rely on behind hooker.I cant believe what im saying right now, but.... I think we are really good at SS/FS.
apparently, you have issues , this is SM and im not in a professional or academia type environment, nor care to write organized letter to you..I don’t think I’ve ever read a coherent sentence from you on this board.
and Im not saying that are not a few really nice prospects in this draft class, man its going to be hard on passing on a few if they are within our range.thats what i said LOL