Wow Idgit must have touched a nerve on that one to get that response, and evidently you didnt think much of Murray.
It amazes me how many dont understand what happens if you could change a past event , like keeping Murray instead of
letting him go.
Now if say they had got Murray back after the 2nd game and Romo was already hurt, then yeah what you say would be mostly true.
However if they had kept Murray, and might as well add sign Dez in April and he gets the full camp, everything would have been
different course of events.
The offensive plan for the season would have been totally different, and that includes the philly game where Tony was hurt.
So with that change Tony would not have got hurt the way he did, that play would not have happened at all.
If Tony doesnt get hurt there he could still get hurt later or before, or maybe not at all, we'll never know.
Just keeping Murray would have meant less passing and more Running, and probably like 2014 , more 3rd and shorts.
That alone would have helped Romo , with less chance of getting hurt.
When they let murray go, they did not think they could power run like before, so they decided to use dunbar more and throw to him,
and throwing to the backs was the new plan.
The offensive plan of 2014 left when Murray left, and it isnt because he was all that great, they just had confidence in him
both coaches and players ( not the super smart fans though
)
So with him leaving they didnt know what they had or could do with their backs, and it wasnt until later in the season, that McF got his chance
and did good, but not as good as 2014 and you know who.
Just keeping Murray would have kept Romo from getting hurt when he did, an maybe he makes the whole season, which changes
how the season would have went.