Bob Sacamano
Benched
- Messages
- 57,084
- Reaction score
- 3
peplaw06;1525717 said:I call BS
you're probably doing it right now
peplaw06;1525717 said:I call BS
Oh puhlease... I'm sitting on my computer surfing the internet. How could I possibly find anything on the internet that would help me do that......?? oh yeah.Bob Sacamano;1525720 said:you're probably doing it right now
zeromaster;1525567 said:Thanks, just wondering how this one was stacking up. I used to be on DMN long back and remember the Q threads then. I imagine it was more fun here.
Is this easier than just backing up your made-up statistic yourself?burmafrd;1525865 said:For all those claiming a higher percentage of people are smoking weed- prove it. Show some research or something that says more are smoking weed then I guessed at. I will try and be polite about those idiots claiming a significant percentage of people smoke it.
First- where would 100 million people get so much weed? Using that figure as a starting point. You would have to be able to buy it on almost every street corner in America. can you?
What you are saying is that more people are smoking weed then are smoking cigarets. And weed is a lot more expensive.
So show some evidence.
burmafrd;1525889 said:Interesting speculations based on very limited surveys. However, even here- if you look in the small print- they were saying only 2.1 million new users per year. At that rate it would take 48 years to reach 100 million. And I seriously doubt that 50% of all 12th graders have used pot. AT least NOT nationwide. In the inner cities, and some other places- maybe.
One other thing: 6% use it daily? really hard to believe. A lot of people are very skeptical of these stats from the government- they think the people there are cooking stats in order to increase funding. I would like to see some stats from some NON government sources WITHOUT a reason to want the stats to be so high.
Vintage;1525888 said:Wait. He makes up a stat........then ASKS for proof to "disprove" his made up stat.
LOL.
Awesome.
superpunk;1525904 said:Looks like it's time for this thread to die an NFL Zone death.
superpunk;1525904 said:Looks like it's time for this thread to die an NFL Zone death.
DallasEast;1526279 said:I would like to point out that only ONE poster...
...yes, only ONE poster...
...on this entire thread found obscure docket data for Surry County, Virginiia. Now, that's great research.
Where's the love? WHERE'S THE LOVE???
:
You are SO cruel! :Yeagermeister;1526324 said:Vick is waiting to show it too you
burmafrd;1525892 said:http://parentingteens.about.com/cs/marijuana/a/marijuana10.htm
that gives a TOTAL of 83 million who have tried it at least once over the age of 12. 36% of the population. Much higher then I beleived but STILL not MOST of the US Population. Certainly much LOWER then some here have claimed.
I think you were responding to WG, who said this...burmafrd said:I really doubt more then a tiny percentage of people smoke pot. 10% at most. And real serious hard core pot heads- at best 1%.
and thisI think a large percentage of players indulge in that particular plant, so Vick is no exception in that regards.
I didn't say a majority, but it wouldn't surprise me that large numbers do in fact indulge in that particular habit. It's not about condoning the behavior, I just don't think it makes Vick's turdism stand out that much more than any other player who likes to do it.