Federal Search Warrant Executed on Vick House

Bob Sacamano;1525720 said:
you're probably doing it right now
Oh puhlease... I'm sitting on my computer surfing the internet. How could I possibly find anything on the internet that would help me do that......?? :confused: oh yeah.
 
zeromaster;1525567 said:
Thanks, just wondering how this one was stacking up. I used to be on DMN long back and remember the Q threads then. I imagine it was more fun here.

No idea on Q threads, even though our own get started because he still has genius followers.

Just yesterday, the Vela thread on Ellis was over 400 posts. Before that there was the thread on PacMan's suspension, which somehow turned into a discussion on what habeus corpus means, that was over 500 before it got locked.

Before that, there was a thread about not picking a WR in the first that went 600, but I can't even tell you what that was really about.

And of course the gameday threads are 1000-2000 posts long.

list of really long threads...

There are a few of us who really like to get into it with each other. Not me, necessarily, but.... :)
 
For all those claiming a higher percentage of people are smoking weed- prove it. Show some research or something that says more are smoking weed then I guessed at. I will try and be polite about those idiots claiming a significant percentage of people smoke it.
First- where would 100 million people get so much weed? Using that figure as a starting point. You would have to be able to buy it on almost every street corner in America. can you?
What you are saying is that more people are smoking weed then are smoking cigarets. And weed is a lot more expensive.
So show some evidence.
 
burmafrd;1525865 said:
For all those claiming a higher percentage of people are smoking weed- prove it. Show some research or something that says more are smoking weed then I guessed at. I will try and be polite about those idiots claiming a significant percentage of people smoke it.
First- where would 100 million people get so much weed? Using that figure as a starting point. You would have to be able to buy it on almost every street corner in America. can you?
What you are saying is that more people are smoking weed then are smoking cigarets. And weed is a lot more expensive.
So show some evidence.
Is this easier than just backing up your made-up statistic yourself?

What do you mean by your "statistic" that 10% of people smoke pot, and less than 1% are serious pot-heads? What extent is "smoking pot", and what extent is "serious pot-head."?
 
it would be hard to guess at the percentage of Pot smokers but just going by the arrest list it is well over 10%

http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7040

Executive Director Allen St. Pierre, who noted that at current rates, a marijuana smoker is arrested every 40 seconds in America.
 
Wait. He makes up a stat........then ASKS for proof to "disprove" his made up stat.

LOL.

Awesome.
 
Interesting speculations based on very limited surveys. However, even here- if you look in the small print- they were saying only 2.1 million new users per year. At that rate it would take 48 years to reach 100 million. And I seriously doubt that 50% of all 12th graders have used pot. AT least NOT nationwide. In the inner cities, and some other places- maybe.

One other thing: 6% use it daily? really hard to believe. A lot of people are very skeptical of these stats from the government- they think the people there are cooking stats in order to increase funding. I would like to see some stats from some NON government sources WITHOUT a reason to want the stats to be so high.
 
burmafrd;1525889 said:
Interesting speculations based on very limited surveys. However, even here- if you look in the small print- they were saying only 2.1 million new users per year. At that rate it would take 48 years to reach 100 million. And I seriously doubt that 50% of all 12th graders have used pot. AT least NOT nationwide. In the inner cities, and some other places- maybe.

One other thing: 6% use it daily? really hard to believe. A lot of people are very skeptical of these stats from the government- they think the people there are cooking stats in order to increase funding. I would like to see some stats from some NON government sources WITHOUT a reason to want the stats to be so high.


Actually, its a proven fact that the government only inflates numbers by 10%.

So no, they are close to legit.
 
I would like to point out that only ONE poster...

...yes, only ONE poster...

...on this entire thread found obscure docket data for Surry County, Virginiia. Now, that's great research.

Where's the love? WHERE'S THE LOVE??? :confused:

:p:
 
DallasEast;1526279 said:
I would like to point out that only ONE poster...

...yes, only ONE poster...

...on this entire thread found obscure docket data for Surry County, Virginiia. Now, that's great research.

Where's the love? WHERE'S THE LOVE??? :confused:

:p:

Vick is waiting to show it too you :D
 
burmafrd;1525892 said:
http://parentingteens.about.com/cs/marijuana/a/marijuana10.htm

that gives a TOTAL of 83 million who have tried it at least once over the age of 12. 36% of the population. Much higher then I beleived but STILL not MOST of the US Population. Certainly much LOWER then some here have claimed.

Who on this thread claimed any percentage of people smoked pot? I can only find one person... three guesses as to who that was. And you said...
burmafrd said:
I really doubt more then a tiny percentage of people smoke pot. 10% at most. And real serious hard core pot heads- at best 1%.
I think you were responding to WG, who said this...
I think a large percentage of players indulge in that particular plant, so Vick is no exception in that regards.
and this
I didn't say a majority, but it wouldn't surprise me that large numbers do in fact indulge in that particular habit. It's not about condoning the behavior, I just don't think it makes Vick's turdism stand out that much more than any other player who likes to do it.

WG left herself an out. She said "large numbers," which could be defined in any number of ways. Hell a third of the population over 12, which you provided. And it's probably even higher when you narrow the age range to the ages of NFL players. Check males age 20-40. I betcha that number is even higher.

No one ever said "most of the US population," it was just a large number of NFL players, which, if I read WG correctly, is what she was referring to.

.....This is the part where you admit you were hasty and wrong....:scram:
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,054
Messages
13,786,143
Members
23,771
Latest member
LandryHat
Back
Top