Hoofbite
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 40,894
- Reaction score
- 11,620
Cajuncowboy;4403780 said:I put nothing past them. There was no due process in the other seizures so why not?
What should their course of action have been?
Cajuncowboy;4403780 said:I put nothing past them. There was no due process in the other seizures so why not?
chip_gilkey;4403786 said:That is BS. The reason they say things like this is to try to gain support for what they're doing. These companies would charge the exact same amount even if they had all the freeloaders' money who watch online for free. Why? Because they can. No company like that is interested in doing anything other than screwing people out of as much money as they possibly can. If they magically got all those people to subscribe I bet their rates wouldn't go down a bit.
Hoofbite;4403797 said:That is an interesting quote.
I'd like to know how people who are viewing out-of-market games costs the league or broadcasters anything.
Unless they assume that all those people streaming online would have purchased Sunday Ticket to legally watch out-of-market games, how the hell do they even say they are losing money?
Idgit;4404046 said:Wait. Feds are stopping people from stealing, and we're supposed to be upset about this? Cry me a river.
bbgun;4403578 said:
Idgit;4404046 said:Wait. Feds are stopping people from stealing, and we're supposed to be upset about this? Cry me a river.
Hoofbite;4403797 said:That is an interesting quote.
I'd like to know how people who are viewing out-of-market games costs the league or broadcasters anything.
Unless they assume that all those people streaming online would have purchased Sunday Ticket to legally watch out-of-market games, how the hell do they even say they are losing money?
Idgit;4404046 said:Wait. Feds are stopping people from stealing, and we're supposed to be upset about this? Cry me a river.
bbgun;4403604 said:MU was based in Hong Kong, but they did have servers in Virginia.
Makes me wonder why we need SOPA if the Feds can just unilaterally snuff websites.
Cythim;4404537 said:SOPA would be necessary to block sites like http://www.firstrowsports.eu/ since the feds can't shut it down.
vta;4404408 said:It's amazing how the definition of cost is no longer a loss due to spending, but is now defined as money you never had nor probably would have had.
CowboyMcCoy;4404558 said:No one wants SOPA. You know that's what they do in North Korea, 'cept for it's a lot worse. However, with the NDAA dictator-like legislation they're getting closer and closer to the end of the spectrum North Korea is on.
By the way, some of these things that effect us on the off-topic zone can turn political. Do we have a board in the election year?
Or maybe the question is, where do peeps around here post for things like this about government, but naturally can get a tad bit political sometimes?
Future;4404709 said:I never understood how sharing streaming stuff on the internet is different than inviting people over to watch the game at your house.
I used to have the dish, and I'm pretty sure I heard my dad say "Yea the game's on the dish come over and watch" about a million times. Should my dad be shut down?
Cythim;4404718 said:Is your dad going to invite millions of people over and allow them to pause the game whenever they want? Is he going to earn money from advertisers because of the traffic in and out of his house?
Future;4404709 said:I never understood how sharing streaming stuff on the internet is different than inviting people over to watch the game at your house.
I used to have the dish, and I'm pretty sure I heard my dad say "Yea the game's on the dish come over and watch" about a million times. Should my dad be shut down?
Cythim;4404715 said:No one wants SOPA because it has become taboo to support SOPA. Scare tactics such as "OMG they are gonna use SOPA to shut down the Zone" (which is completely false) or likening it to the actions of a totalitarian regime (which is like comparing Eisenhower to Hitler for building the interstate system) frighten people away from finding out what it actually is intended to do. I don't agree with SOPA because it is using a bazooka when a flyswatter will do the trick but I do not disagree with shutting down or blocking websites that provide illegal access to protected material.
Cythim;4404715 said:No one wants SOPA because it has become taboo to support SOPA. Scare tactics such as "OMG they are gonna use SOPA to shut down the Zone" (which is completely false) or likening it to the actions of a totalitarian regime (which is like comparing Eisenhower to Hitler for building the interstate system) frighten people away from finding out what it actually is intended to do. I don't agree with SOPA because it is using a bazooka when a flyswatter will do the trick but I do not disagree with shutting down or blocking websites that provide illegal access to protected material.
Hoofbite;4404731 said:Are you suggesting that I could burn copies of DVDs for me and buddies and be totally fine so long as I didn't profit off it?