dantheman41
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,064
- Reaction score
- 545
That site was very bad for me. I went back and reviewed a larger sample size of some of the players I've been spouting my mouth off and I might have to eat a little crow. I still don't see the rave about Donald (maybe just my untrained judgemental eye) but I used to think he wasn't as good as Jernigen. I was wrong! They both have different strengths to be sure but yeah Donald isn't that bad and Jernigen isn't that good as I've believed. Donald is much more disruptive (the only team I could compare apples-apples was georgia tech) but Jernigen was MUCH better against the run. Jernigen was not nearly as much in the backfield tho. I'm not seeing what you guys are seeing about Hagemon either. Could you help me out? I saw a guy that was routinely handled one vs one and little to no penetration. I was expecting much more. Like I said, this site might have been very bad for me thanks for all the work you did.
Thanks and I appreciate your feedback. While Donald was very good player on tape, he was considered a 2nd round player before senior bowl. So he wasn't absolutely dominating as you would expect from the hype he is getting. At the senior bowl and the combine it showed how good a player he was, and also his potential. He was unblockable all week at the senior bowl, and at the combine he posted absolutely ridiculously numbers for a DT.
And yes I agree with you on Jernigan. I think he is a stout, strong player who can get some push but I don't see a dominate football player. If I am taking a DT in the first round, I want that guy to be extremely disruptive. I don't want a run stuffer who can occasionally get a pressure on the QB. We have that in Nick Hayden. Aaron Donald is a much better prospect for that.
Donald would not be receiving the hype if this draft had better first round talent at DT, or is Easley was healthy. But he is far and away the safest prospect at the position.