Most of the time I’d oppose taking a RB in the first now days, definitely not in the top 10. It has been devalued in the draft for various reasons, but there are some exceptions later in the first. It’s hasn’t dropped initially to the level of PK or punter, where it’s a definite no in the 1st ever.
And what changes from say 10 to 26 where we are this year is in the top 10 you’d be choosing from several players at different positions grading out in the same range. Most years there are less than 20 players with a first round grade. Even if Bijan has a top 5 grade the gap wouldn’t be big enough between him and other positions who also have a top 10-15 first round grade.
But at 26, a legit top top grade and comparable to the top 4-5 backs over the last decade then he would easily be BPA and at a need area. Doubtful any other option would even have a 1st round grade at that point.
You still have to factor in the draft pool on top of the longevity issue. But I think a lot of teams now would have taken Henry in the first, especially in the 20’s as well as Barkley, Gurley, etc.
Perfect situations are teams like KC and Philly. They are already SB teams, few needs but could use a RB and are at the very bottom of the first. Plus Philly has the best 10th pick also. Probably the reason Gibbs is the most mocked player for the Eagles at 30, still likely a 1st round grade and probably BPA at that spot.
I think it will be moot though with Bijan because I think he will go in the top 25. And that point a possible 15-20 ranked player like Gibbs plus a deep RB class and multiple needs wouldn’t be enough for me to pull the trigger on him at 26.