Do you have any idea how void years work? I'm assuming not. I haven't ignored the void year part at all, but the void years go against the argument for Daks contract. Dak has void years already added to his contract but despite that he still cost the Cowboys $55M against the cap this year. Josh Allen does not have any void years yet and has a lower cap number. The Bills can still talk to Josh about adding void year to lower his numbers for the rest of his deal. If he doesnt look to renegotiate his deal the Allen deal will look better and better.
Imagine not realizing the contradiction. I'll let you figure it out yourself. Don't hurt yourself.
Sure, but Dak never would haven take 7 years at $40M. Maybe at $50 he would have.
I agree. All I ever said was that daks contract wasn’t very team friendly. He worked jerry over in negotiations by every metric.
I actually do understand what I am talking about. You see I actually had a class as a Freshman in Law school at McGeorge School of Law, it was called CONTRACTS.
Hold out is also a part of the contract that where the fines come from.
And I'm telling you for one don't say you I have nothing to do with it and neither do you and neither do anybody in the media there are no experts in here or anywhere I've known to come in and post about on social media or the Internet this is about Prescott and his agents and he would not have signed A-Team friendly deal because they would not have allowed it even if it was six years and three years he would have came back and demanded a new deal that is how it's been working with players lately and apparently you've been lying to it he would have threatened to hold out after three years in that would have been a fact I'm telling you they knew what was coming they were forecasting what's going on with the quarterback market and they were not gonna allow dak to take a bad deal so there is no would you rather among fans because that's not how it works in reality the agents the players and the front office are three moving pieces that have to all be on the same page and I promise you the agents would not allow their player to sign a bad deal. They were not desperate,, you know how I know this because he played on the franchise tag he didn't even hold out then he has ankle snapped off and he still got paid so it doesn't matter if players like Prescott or elite players at their positions top five whatever you wanna call it if they have to risk playing with their fifth year options or their franchise tags they should do it because most of them are gonna get paid whether they get hurt or not and you can also get insurance for that..
I guess murder is also allowed under your logic, since that is where life sentences come from.
Dak played for like 2.1 mil his final season. I don't believe for a second he wouldn't have signed the right deal, France or otherwise.
They're all greedy, and the players are underpaid relative to their contributions and revenue. The sticking point is that things are set up so that the players interests are at odds with fans. The CBA is the real culprit and the owners are the driving force, and the players are idiot accomplices.
literally every team is in that same scenario, but it's the cowboys who wind up in the predicament most often. that's a jones issue. signing early isn't "team friendly" It's mutually beneficial.
this guy is impossible to hold a conversation with.
You just believe contracts should be honored by the payer only.
holy cow.... pay attention. I have said that teams always honor contracts. Id actually like players to also honor contracts... players do not honor contracts. look no further than CeeDee Lamb for evidence.
But it's not not when they can't come to an agreement it's not mutually beneficial most of the time when you're asking a player to sign early you want him to go long years because the first two years are gonna be the of the same contract they don't get start getting paid but it allows the team to spread the money out... So it's not always in every case mutually beneficial or everyone would do it and they do not there are a lot of teams out there on franchise tags and fit their options lots of players are doing it they're threatening holdouts after three years I mean this is the new thing it's becoming more and more normal for the players to just start thinking at year three of any contract from the rookie or their other one with their hand out for another bite at the apple..
Players are honoring contracts, they are allowed to hold out. If they were not then they would not be able to do it.
I guess my comment about murder went over your head. I can kill someone, but it doesnt mean it is permitted.I guess it goes... hey, you can murder someone, but it will cost you 20 years of your life as the specified penalty. Well damn, I guess that means the state is permitting it???????
Of course it is permitted. You just don't like to. Just like players don't like being cut from a contract they signed.
