Twitter: For fans concerned about Dak passing under 200 yards

[cwbyfn88]

Y'all sounding like this guys parent which y'all aren't. Nobody beating down this dude stop the hyperbole. He can't fix his flaws or he would've done it by now. These are the same dang problems that got him drafted in the fourth rd. If he had them then and three years in has the same problems what are the chances of him changing them? You may not be a blind homer but in this discussion you're waiting for someone to help you across the street lol.

Also this nitpick a win is bs because saying he can't throw isn't nitpicking a W. You're on the don't say nothing when we win plan and I'm not. If you don't say this stuff now even in victory a lot of people maybe even youself will say when they lose why didn't anybody say this when they were winning. I do appreciate this civil back and forth though.

I'm not sold after 2 years and only two games into his 3rd year that he can't improve. His rookie year was stellar. And even as a Romosexual I didn't think he should lose his job to Romo once Romo was healthy enough to return. The following season though I thought Dak should take the back seat because he was too raw. And continue to learn under Romo. Romo retires and leaves the team for the booth and Dak drops off dramatically. A player can be coached. But you need the right guy to do it. Just look at our defense. A how many threads did we have that Byron Jones is a bum? Anthony Brown a one year wonder. Suddenly under Richard they are balling again. I don't think Kellen More is a good QB coach for still a young QB. Just my humble opinion.

 

[Dale]

The point Adam is making, rather resoundingly, is that passing yardage is not among the most determining factors to whether a QB leads his team to victory.

No further context needed.

 

[Philmonroe]

Did you like the victory? That's what it's about, deflection doesn't deter me.

It's not about deflection your stupid question has nothing to do with is this guy good or not which we are posting about. This isn't a did the Boys win thread if it was you'd have a point. Heck out of here with claims of deflection when to be honest your question is deflection central. How the hell you get did they win from I don't think this guy is a good qb? Talk about deflections smh. Must be a bunch of Tebow time fans in here.

 

[Aviano90]

Completely lacking substance as always.

At least I know when I am being absurd. The sad thing is you and the other Romo-loving Dak-haters actuallly believe the crap you are saying is “substance”.

 

[Philmonroe]

Sounds like a Tony Romo homer.

Y'all sounding like delusional stalkers I don't think I've mentioned Romo once. Get it together.

 

[Irvin88_4life]

Eh this is bogus. I don't like when people get emotional and don't tell the whole story. He hit one big play on like the 2/3rd play of the game and after that all the other deep balls weren't close iirc. That's not the same as he was killing it throwing it deep and sure as heck hasn't been the norm recently. I wish folks would realize that but I understand some feel their little man Dak is under attack and have to rush to his defense.

He is Alex Smith a decent qb but SB qb I seriously doubt it. Obviously hope I'm wrong.

Wasn't close on the other deep balls? Which game was you watching because it wasn't Sunday night. Our offense doesn't pass deep, that's Garrett's scheme. Only Romo went deep and that's because he could call his own plays. Back to Dak on Sunday, did you miss the deep ball to Gallup that hit him in the hands? Was that not close or does he need to hit Gallup in the back of the helmet

 

[Clove]

It's not about deflection your stupid question has nothing to do with is this guy good or not which we are posting about. This isn't a did the Boys win thread if it was you'd have a point. Heck out of here with claims of deflection when to be honest your question is deflection central. How the hell you get did they win from I don't think this guy is a good qb? Talk about deflections smh. Must be a bunch of Tebow time fans in here.

So amount of yardage determines if you're a Super Bowl QB?

 

[big dog cowboy]

BTW .......is this from our own Cowboy Zone poster to Bob Sturm?

Comnplete ownage.

Mess with AdamJT13 you get the horns.

 

[jobberone]

Pass better than your opponent and you win roughly 80% of the time if turnovers equal or TO Diff is +.

 

[Irvin88_4life]

The problem is when people try to use statistics to prove their agenda rather than to reflect reality.

The problem is Dak isn't able to beat good defenses and good teams through the air, and time after time that will catch up with this team. Will, you beat poor teams like the Giants? Maybe. Will you occasionally beat a good team? Sure. Will you win consistently enough to make it through the playoffs? I seriously doubt it.

In this game the defense won the game. What happens when you play a team with a QB better than Eli? An offense more consistent that the Giants, who by the way rank 29th in the league in points per game (guess who they are tied with, the Cowboys...). Dallas is also 30th in yards.

So yeah, you can beat poor teams, but when you play good teams, and we will, we're going to struggle.

Dak has beat good teams through the air, so that statement is false. Has he done it the last half of the season and the 2 games this year..... No he hasn't but doesn't mean he can't

 

[Clove]

Y'all sounding like delusional stalkers I don't think I've mentioned Romo once. Get it together.

I'm trying to figure out what your idea of a good QB is, because you actually believe that amount of yardage determines it. You do know that Aikman was terrible at yardage, right?

 

[Philmonroe]

Wasn't close on the other deep balls? Which game was you watching because it wasn't Sunday night. Our offense doesn't pass deep, that's Garrett's scheme. Only Romo went deep and that's because he could call his own plays. Back to Dak on Sunday, did you miss the deep ball to Gallup that hit him in the hands? Was that not close or does he need to hit Gallup in the back of the helmet

I question if you watched the game because he threw some more passes deep and they mostly all went out of bounds. I'm not talking throw away either.

 

[Gator88]

At least I know when I am being absurd. The sad thing is you and the other Romo-loving Dak-haters actuallly believe the crap you are saying is “substance”.

I have no hate for Dak, I just don't see him being able to fix the glaring flaws that were there since his rookie year. He hasn't made any noticeable progress on these problems in 2 full offseasons which makes me think they would be better off upgrading the most important position on the field. I do have beef with whoever was dumb enough to waste Dallas' best chance at making a run since the 90s on trying to be the first team to do it with a rookie qb though..

 

[Clove]

And if the guy has a great defense, is that his fault? It's up to him to move the offense and not do stupid ****, and if that wins games, it wins games. Now if you want to talk about his inability to take chances, to attack defenses, to not freeze when there's a blitz, just step aside from it and hit your target, then we will be on the same team, but this yardage nonsense is for 14 year olds who know nothing about football.

 

[Clove]

I have no hate for Dak, I just don't see him being able to fix the glaring flaws that were there since his rookie year. He hasn't made any noticeable progress on these problems in 2 full offseasons which makes me think they would be better off upgrading the most important position on the field. I do have beef with whoever was dumb enough to waste Dallas' best chance at making a run since the 90s on trying to be the first team to do it with a rookie qb though..

I actually agree with this statement.

 

[cwbyfn88]

Wasn't close on the other deep balls? Which game was you watching because it wasn't Sunday night. Our offense doesn't pass deep, that's Garrett's scheme. Only Romo went deep and that's because he could call his own plays. Back to Dak on Sunday, did you miss the deep ball to Gallup that hit him in the hands? Was that not close or does he need to hit Gallup in the back of the helmet

Don't forget the deep ball that Thompson pulled up on. Would have been another huge strike but he jogged his route almost as if he wasn't expecting to be thrown to. If he kept going at his original speed he runs right under that. Maybe even takes it to the house.

 

[Philmonroe]

I'm trying to figure out what your idea of a good QB is, because you actually believe that amount of yardage determines it. You do know that Aikman was terrible at yardage, right?

Different era and you know that. My idea of a good qb is one that is good at his main job which is passing. If you're not good at that how good can you really be? I don't have no rankings but I do think you need to accurate. Running is cool and I didn't knock Dak for that but I rather have an accurate pocket passer that runs every now and then. The best qbs have been mainly pocket passers for the longest and Dak isn't changing the game with his skill set.

 

[Clove]

Different era and you know that. My idea of a good qb is one that is good at his main job which is passing. If you're not good at that how good can you really be? I don't have no rankings but I do think you need to accurate. Running is cool and I didn't knock Dak for that but I rather have an accurate pocket passer that runs every now and then. The best qbs have been mainly pocket passers for the longest and Dak isn't changing the game with his skill set.

Then how does yardage equate to that, because this is what the argument is about?

 

[HungryLion]

Don't need it because it doesn't mesh with your agenda... sounds about right.

The fact that Adam showed 11 games against winning teams and 10 against playoff teams over a 10 year period should tell you everything you need to know about how hard it is to consistently beat good teams without effective passing games.

Actually, the numbers are pulled from a small window of passer rating. The argument he is making in the first place, is that the passer rating and lack of ints is what makes something a effective passing game. Not total yards.

He isn’t arguing that ineffective passing games is conducive to winning games. He’s saying total yards doesn’t correlate to winning games.



So........... you don’t even know what you’re arguing against.

 

[Philmonroe]

So amount of yardage determines if you're a Super Bowl QB?

You love asking stupid pointless questions smdh. Could you please ask me questions based on what I posted not these made up questions of yours?