LACowboysFan1
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,703
- Reaction score
- 7,616
Lunchtime!!!!!
Later...
Later...
Was thinking that too
I mean, we gave up a 5th for Austin. If it works out...great!
Please stop hating the guy and get a light bulb moment please!
Actually it was a 6th.
Austin's speed and the success of the run game are like yin and yang.
You simply have to account for him. You can't just not cover him.
That gives you a lot of options, and he should show more value here because of the run game. I also expect him to help it, and as an aside, the passing game as well especially if we implement more play action.
You're right. The Rams didn't have a running game last year.
I don't hate Austin, just his fumbling when returning kicks
If Austin is to have any real success with DC, the coaches are gonna have to find a way to get him into the lineup on a consistent basis.
His predecessors (Dunbar, Whitehead, Switzer) never really got enough touches to prove/disprove their value. And each of these guys had talent.
Garrett & Co are now on their fourth version (Austin) of a scatback/returner/4th WR (or whatever you wanna call ‘em), with none of the first three having made any sustained impact on the team’s success.
Something tells me it may be more of a system/game-planning issue than a talent issue.
Dunbar played 16% of the snaps in the 13 games he was healthy for 2016 (10.7 snaps per game).
Whitehead played 14.4% in 2016 of the 15 games he was active (9.33 snaps per game).
Just combine those snaps and give them to Austin.
That's 20 snaps per game.
The Cowboys averaged about 66 snaps per game in both 2016 and 2017.