- Messages
- 58,971
- Reaction score
- 60,826
I don't think it's intentional at all.
I'm a generous guy, so I give the benefit of the doubt.
I don't think it's intentional at all.
the Eagles are stronger than Dallas in the trenches on both sides of the ball and have better skill players except for Zeke
if you cant control the line you cant control anything youre just along for the ride
23 years now, Jerry has been trying to disprove this.the Eagles are stronger than Dallas in the trenches on both sides of the ball and have better skill players except for Zeke
if you cant control the line you cant control anything youre just along for the ride
Where the Eagles excelled on the OL is having decent backups. Vaitai did an excellent job stepping in for Peters.If Smith is healthy, I don't see the iggles are better on the o-line. Maybe equal...
we will get it figured out23 years now, Jerry has been trying to disprove this.
they are generally ranked as the best over the last couple of yearsWhere the Eagles excelled on the OL is having decent backups. Vaitai did an excellent job stepping in for Peters.
And w/ Kelce, Lane Johnson, and Brandon Brooks, their OL is very comparable to ours.
Lane Johnson is prolly the best ORT in the NFL.we will get it figured out
they are generally ranked as the best over the last couple of years
overall their tackles are better when you put Lane vs Lael and their interior guys are fairly equal, the biggest thing is they have no weakspots
as you said their depth is decisive although i feel much better now having Fleming and a LG
ill be happy if Lael can keep improvingLane Johnson is prolly the best ORT in the NFL.
If he had a top 5 defense and MVP type QB his chances would increase dramatically.I'm not the biggest Garrett fan, but do you believe the Boys get to the SB in two years with the Eagles coaching staff?
I have to laugh a bit, as I recall a fair number of posters saying that the Eagles o-line was overrated and only average before the season started...that our o-line was clearly superior.we will get it figured out
they are generally ranked as the best over the last couple of years
overall their tackles are better when you put Lane vs Lael and their interior guys are fairly equal, the biggest thing is they have no weakspots
as you said their depth is decisive although i feel much better now having Fleming and a LG
well they were smart about it, give them creditI have to laugh a bit, as I recall a fair number of posters saying that the Eagles o-line was overrated and only average before the season started...that our o-line was clearly superior.
If he had a top 5 defense and MVP type QB his chances would increase dramatically.
Pedersen inherited a pretty good defense and his first draft pick was Wentz. Then went and got Foles for backup. That’s the difference!
Pederson watched tape and changed the O to fit Foles after determining what made him successful.Again you make it sound like those things grow on trees. Just appear out of thin air. Like coaching has nothing to do with the defense or the QB.
Pederson watched tape and changed the O to fit Foles after determining what made him successful.
Not without Foles or Wentz!I'm not the biggest Garrett fan, but do you believe the Boys get to the SB in two years with the Eagles coaching staff?