Nexx
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,052
- Reaction score
- 5,501
That is true, but he proved he could be a starter. If not a franchise quarterback. So what is your points
just correcting what you wrote. that was the point.
That is true, but he proved he could be a starter. If not a franchise quarterback. So what is your points
Correcting what. I didn’t see anything that needed to be corrected. All I’m saying is your quarterback rating does it mean crap for four gamesjust correcting what you wrote. that was the point.
We were definitely looking for a quarterback. The Prescott was a huge surprise. I still think you can take us to the big one
Well...my point was to respond to the guy in the second post who posted QBRs comparing Dak of 2016 to Rush of today's QBRs. My point was to update that a bit to show that Dak has regressed to below where Rush is now...as far as QBR is concerned anyway. And no, I don't care about your opinion on that Stat and whether it is meaningful to you, because honestly, I don't really care about the Stat either. Just pointing it out...get the point?Again your point.
LMAO. Then why use something you don’t care about. Lol, this is just getting too funny. Get the point.Well...my point was to respond to the guy in the second post who posted QBRs comparing Dak of 2016 to Rush of today's QBRs. My point was to update that a bit to show that Dak has regressed to below where Rush is now...as far as QBR is concerned anyway. And no, I don't care about your opinion on that Stat and whether it is meaningful to you, because honestly, I don't really care about the Stat either. Just pointing it out...get the point?
We’re playing the Eagles Sunday night. And Prescott has a 97% Passing rating against them . Why don’t you use that statistic. Oh it doesn’t fit your narrativeWell...my point was to respond to the guy in the second post who posted QBRs comparing Dak of 2016 to Rush of today's QBRs. My point was to update that a bit to show that Dak has regressed to below where Rush is now...as far as QBR is concerned anyway. And no, I don't care about your opinion on that Stat and whether it is meaningful to you, because honestly, I don't really care about the Stat either. Just pointing it out...get the point?
Because I was responding to the post of someone else referencing a different Stat? Let me know when this gets too difficult. I'll switch to using pictures. Also, are we back to using QB W/L records, you guys have gone in hard on "the team wins games" thing this week.We’re playing the Eagles Sunday night. And Prescott has a 97% Passing rating against them . Why don’t you use that statistic. Oh it doesn’t fit your narrative
Because it's factual? I don't have to care about it for it to be trueLMAO. Then why use something you don’t care about. Lol, this is just getting too funny. Get the point.
We’re playing the Eagles Sunday night. And Prescott has a 97% Passing rating against them . Why don’t you use that statistic. Oh it doesn’t fit your narrative
Correcting what. I didn’t see anything that needed to be corrected. All I’m saying is your quarterback rating does it mean crap for four games
Why? His QBR is higher than Daks was all of last season with the "#1 Offense" crap. Daks QBR against San Fran in the playoffs was 30 something.Ridiculous to even post.
There’s no comparison. Dak has a miner fracture in his thumb. Romo had a compression fracture in his vertebrae!
I believe you.Stop talking nonsense. Romo had a compression fracture to his back. It was a freak injury that happened due to the way he slid and his body was contorted forward with the full weight of the defensive player on him, and any player including Dak could’ve suffered the same injury if hit in the same manner.
Dak has always been carried by the team. He’s never carried it.