News: Fox: Tony Romo arrested in Milwaukee for OWI

You don't know any more of the details but you want to crucify the dude. He apparently passed a car improperly....hardly sounds like he was a menace on the road. At the start, neither one of them could hear each other clearly due to the noise on the roadway. He was polite, answered all her questions, cooperated with field tests. Lawyers always tell you not to do the breathalyzer because it is a faulty test. I am willing to bet that the case gets dismissed. Nothing in the video suggests he was impaired. And one beer will you put alcohol on your breath....doesn't make you impaired.
Nothing suggests he was impaired?

He couldn't follow the pen without moving his head. That suggests impairement.

He couldn't understand the most basic of instructions and needed them to be constantly repeated. Then he proceeded not to follow the instructions as given. That suggests impairement.

He couldn't do a heel to toe step (or he didn't even try taking big gaps between his feet). That suggests impairment.

Did he look wasted? No. Were there things that suggested impairment? Absolutely.

The balance on one leg was pretty impressive though.
 
That's a good point since the loudspeaker was the first topic of discussion between them. If she thought he "might" try to avoid her then that ratchets things up to start.
I believe that there's another part of the video, where she calls in to inform her dispatch that (at that point) he's not following instruction to get out of the car.

When a Police Officer says "I need you to step out of the car" that doesn't really mean "I need you to step out of the car when you get through texting someone..."

Bty, during the process of being detained (step out of the car), you Do Not at that time, have any Constitutional right to call your lawyer, or your Mother, or whomever...
 
I would hope if they're arresting you and putting you in handcuffs that you have the right to call your lawyer.

The fact they didn't let him call his lawyer and he asked them eight times he said could get the whole thing thrown out.

Also if you're arrested I would think they need to read you your rights and I didn't hear that done either.
Nope.

You don't have a "right to a lawyer" for a DUI stop until you're booked into jail.

He could've and should've refused the tests.

And Miranda rights don't need to be read unless they're asking you incriminating questions.
 
So CBS could have been behind it? You see what I mean? Lol. Hey, not saying it's impossible but that's a little out there.
There's a lot crazier thing.

17 million a year is a lot of money to pay somebody and if you don't really like the way he's coming off but don't have a good excuse to fire him you may need to find one.

They already had a sit-down with him.
So how hard would it be to pay somebody next to nothing in comparison to watch him at some of these events see if he's drinking and tip off the cops problem solved legitimate reason to fire him and move on to who you really want in the job that maybe we'll do it for half the money
 
Follow him to Grandma’s house.

He wasn’t trashed. He answered her questions and was respectful. He wasn’t falling all over. Completely sober I would have trouble doing the tests. He has a screwed up back. I wouldn’t expect him to be able to do it perfectly.
LOL, let an impaired driver back behind the wheel? Uh, no. Then when he crashes, the officer gets fired for negligence.

He refused the breathalyzer for a reason.

He failed the sobriety tests miserably for a reason.

He couldn't follow simple instructions for a reason.

I love Romo, but the only part where I felt bad for him is when his back was in agony trying to sit in that tiny backseat of the squad car.
 
Nothing suggests he was impaired?

He couldn't follow the pen without moving his head. That suggests impairement.

He couldn't understand the most basic of instructions and needed them to be constantly repeated. Then he proceeded not to follow the instructions as given. That suggests impairement.

He couldn't do a heel to toe step (or he didn't even try taking big gaps between his feet). That suggests impairment.

Did he look wasted? No. Were there things that suggested impairment? Absolutely.

The balance on one leg was pretty impressive though.
People are focusing too hard on the "Drunk Driving" issue. The Police Officer smelled alcohol, and that was combined with erratic driving.

If someone (who had had nothing to drink) was just extremely tired while driving, and was crossing the line back and forth, for example, that driver could be pulled over and issued a citation for that line crossing, AND for driving impaired.

Imo, Tony Romo was driving impaired. And Tony could only follow part of the instructions he was given. And the cause of Tony's impairment, whether from alcohol, pain meds, or CTE, I can not say.
 
Nope.

You don't have a "right to a lawyer" for a DUI stop until you're booked into jail.

He could've and should've refused the tests.

And Miranda rights don't need to be read unless they're asking you incriminating questions.
When she said where have you been and he said at the golf course and then she said how much had he had to drink.
He should have stopped right there not said another word called his lawyer been arrested whatever but not said another word.

He should have left her with the words of insinuating because he was playing golf that he was drinking as the last thing said
 
LOL, let an impaired driver back behind the wheel? Uh, no. Then when he crashes, the officer gets fired for negligence.

He refused the breathalyzer for a reason.

He failed the sobriety tests miserably for a reason.

He couldn't follow simple instructions for a reason.

I love Romo, but the only part where I felt bad for him is when his back was in agony trying to sit in that tiny backseat of the squad car.
He couldn't follow simple instructions as a player and did what he wanted why should things change now LOL
And what is up with jamming him in the back of that car handcuffed that was ridiculous

That was totally unnecessary it was almost like they were trying to antagonize him
 
Last edited:
I would hope if they're arresting you and putting you in handcuffs that you have the right to call your lawyer.

The fact they didn't let him call his lawyer and he asked them eight times he said could get the whole thing thrown out.

Also if you're arrested I would think they need to read you your rights and I didn't hear that done either.
The legal system, over time, has eroded many the rights you mention, all of which ultimately came out of the fourth amendment

Where they address this with DUIs is through the traffic laws. Simply driving carries “implied consent”.

  • When you drive your vehicle today, as soon as you get on the road, you are consenting to chemical testing
  • Right to an attorney only protects you from being interrogated without counsel
  • Chemical testing is evidence collection, not interrogation so they can and will not allow you access to an attorney unit it’s complete
  • Insisting on an attorney before testing is considered a refusal and will result in a suspension of your license
As to Miranda, well, this is where the police have got a bit of legal trickery to help them

Miranda only applies to being “interrogated”

Miranda only impacts verbal interaction and “evidence collection” bypasses Miranda

These are all things that can happen to you without the police ever reading you a Miranda warning
  • Pulled over and questioned “oh, at the golf course!” Duh duh duh
  • put through field sobriety testing
  • given a roadside breathalyzer
  • Have your vehicle searched and impounded prior to a tow
  • Be put in a squad car and transported to jail
  • Be subject to a strip search
  • Be subject to a body cavity search
  • Put through chemical testing
  • Charged and booked
  • Held for days in the jail
What they can’t do is prevent you from contacting the outside world, (only the Feds can do that), including an attorney.

All of this is why citizens should be polite and not resist, but also understand that every question, action, movement, are intended to generate, secure and record evidence to be used against you.
 
Last edited:
We have 30 pages of people that never knew the details.

Are you suggesting innocent people shouldn't call their lawyer?
What we really have is 25 pages of you attacking anyone who even suggests anything you disagree with and you counter by spamming mostly nonsensical arguments.

We get it, we don’t have ALL the facts snd he’s presumed innocent until proven guilty. People are giving their OPINIONS on what little facts we do know and that’s ok but obviously you have a serious problem, like beyond the actual small debates we usually have, with those who aren’t defending him like you are.

And you can respond but don’t think I will. I won’t give you the pleasure or excuse to hijack another 25-30 pages by going back and forth with you.

Enjoy your day.
 
When she said where have you been and he said at the golf course and then she said how much had he had to drink.
He should have stopped right there not said another word called his lawyer been arrested whatever but not said another word.

He should have left her with the words of insinuating because he was playing golf that he was drinking as the last thing said
The cop likely thought he was out drinking with the Frat on a golf course.

But it was a State championship. No drinking.
 
The video makes Romo look so bad. I never liked the guy. Something is off. Had this entitled attitude when he should have been so grateful to be a UDFA playing in the league.
 
You don't know any more of the details but you want to crucify the dude. He apparently passed a car improperly....hardly sounds like he was a menace on the road. At the start, neither one of them could hear each other clearly due to the noise on the roadway. He was polite, answered all her questions, cooperated with field tests. Lawyers always tell you not to do the breathalyzer because it is a faulty test. I am willing to bet that the case gets dismissed. Nothing in the video suggests he was impaired. And one beer will you put alcohol on your breath....doesn't make you impaired.
"Nothing in the video suggests he was impaired"

LMAAOOOOOO!!!
:laugh:

You must not have actually watched it all. Couldn't even follow the pen without turning his head, no matter how many times he was told not to.

Obvious sign of impairment right there. Not being able to follow the simplest of instructions.

He literally botched all 3 tests horribly. He didn't walk heel-to-toe. He didn't count his steps out loud. He didn't count while doing the 1-leg stand.

He should've refused to take the tests, but he didn't and failed them miserably.

Also, he didn't even disagree or argue when the female cop said she smelled booze on him. He wasn't hammered but he knocked back a few. Doesn't take much to be impaired and over .08.
 
People are focusing too hard on the "Drunk Driving" issue. The Police Officer smelled alcohol, and that was combined with erratic driving.

If someone (who had had nothing to drink) was just extremely tired while driving, and was crossing the line back and forth, for example, that driver could be pulled over and issued a citation for that line crossing, AND for driving impaired.

Imo, Tony Romo was driving impaired. And Tony could only follow part of the instructions he was given. And the cause of Tony's impairment, whether from alcohol, pain meds, or CTE, I can not say.
Except he nailed a 20 second one leg stand.

With a jacked up back.

Impossible to do if drunk.
 
When she said where have you been and he said at the golf course and then she said how much had he had to drink.
He should have stopped right there not said another word called his lawyer been arrested whatever but not said another word.

He should have left her with the words of insinuating because he was playing golf that he was drinking as the last thing said
You have to get out of the car when asked to do so.

Refusal is an arrestable offense, even if you say, "Hold on, I'm calling my lawyer first." Nope, doesn't work that way.

You have to ID yourself and comply when asked to get out of the car.

Beyond that, you shouldn't answer questions and you certainly shouldn't take any of their tests.

Tony botched the tests horribly and gave them tons of "probable cause" for an arrest. I've seen a million of those police bodycam videos (guilty pleasure on YouTube!) and I've seen FAR more "sober-looking" people get arrested. Tony was clearly impaired and he knew it by the end - hence the refusal to submit to a breathalyzer.
 
LOL....are you serious?????

Officers have protocols to follow laws, policies and procedures regarding traffic stops........
Officers have protocols to follow laws, policies, and procedures regarding traffic stops... and an entire playbook of legal loopholes, like 'consensual encounters' and 'reasonable suspicion,' designed to bypass them
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,509
Messages
14,541,758
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top