Incorrect, logical fallacy based on current actions of the team not on a full body of work.
I offerec no patadigm actually that the paradigm should be balanced and flexibile to include top tier and every tier of free agents, avoiding the either/or fallacy you are wrongly assuming.
For example, if a given team overspends on free agents, given person criticizes current overspending because that is primarily what is being done, that does not mean the person thinks there is never a time high end free agents should be signed nor that every move is problematic with said time at all times.
Again, you have committed the logical fallacy of presumption, reverse accident in particular.
Incorrect, you are arguing from ignorance, another logical fallacy and making presumptions based on limited data to draw a general conclusion that does not corresping to reality with regard to me specifically.