Fla Cowpoke
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,025
- Reaction score
- 12,046
Doesnt hurt to have 4 CBs with starting experience
When 3 of them would be considered mediocre to average at best, I am not sure it is a good thing.
Doesnt hurt to have 4 CBs with starting experience
Yep. I think we should bring back Hardy for a year and draft the best DL at 34 (most likely an interior). I think we need to give T. Crawford some help (and some competition) at 3-tech. I'd be happy going into the season with a DL of:
WDE - Hardy/Gregory
3DT - Crawford/rookie
1DT - Thornton/McClain
SDE - Lawrence/Irving
That's not including Russell and Jack Crawford (if resigned) who can help out at DE and DT.
They have an elite but old qb, the time is now so they traded a de that just got busted for drugs and is in the last year of his contract for a former first round guard (to protect brady) and a second round draft pick.
Then they got one of the top 7 te in the game to pair along with the best in the game. If I was a patriot fan I'd be feeling pretty good about those moves.
I think Scandrick being hurt was a bigger blow than people give it credit. Think about it...we lost the league leading rusher (that was our fault), our top 5-10 in the league QB, our top 3 in the league receiver played hurt or was missing the whole season, and our top CB was gone all season. I think if the three injured players are back to full strength and we draft the right RB to go with DMac that we can be right back into it.
I think Thornton is a BIG upgrade from Hayden in the run defense. I agree that the pass rush is still a concern. Assuming Hardy does not come back I can see Long or Jason Jones as a vet addition and then the obvious choice is Bosa at #4, but my pet cat is Nassib in the 2nd round. I think we will see an improved Crawford after the shoulder surgery and I think DLaw will be moved to the Weak side and have a monster year. .
So every free agent bar one that had come in, chose to sign somewhere else. - not an upgrade, except Thornton. And he is changing position. Steven and Jerry have said since the season ended, that an upgrade at backup QB was a main priority - fail. CB no upgrade, puts the leverage back in Carr's hands - just like last year. No upgrade at DE, chose to sign else where.
So, now that we can only barging basement hunt, we will not really upgrade anywhere, except a 2 down 1-tech.
If the purpose of free agency is to plug holes so you can take best available in the draft. Again, fail. Now we have to find pass rush, CB, RB, LBers, Safety, DT depth etc, etc, etc
And still their stated # 1 priority is has not been addressed.
Not what I had hoped for at all ...
My problem with your problem is this: (lol)
You weren't going to fix the pass rush in free agency.
The best pass rusher available was our own guy. Hardy. And he is the best BY FAR.
The best young talent was Vernon... he of less sacks last year than DLaw. He had less than 1 sacks every 2 games but got paid like a Pro Bowler.
Mario Williams graded out worse on tape than people realize but he was a bnig name so there were cries for him.
And you weren't going to fix CB.
The top CB and pass rushers were franchised. These were guys worth big deals who could have been lead horses.
The available players were and are not that good.
No CB who is better than Orlando Scandrick was available.
So we were once again going to be paying CB1 money for CB2.
And the team wisely did not. They looked for cheaper options and resigned a guy whose got lots of knocks but plenty of upside.
Janoris Jenkins is more reliable than Mo to be sure, but he's probably not a "better" CB on any given play.
STL chose to let him leave. He was a good CB2, much like Brandon Carr that can help but got overpaid mightily.
You don't win in free agency by hitting home runs. The top 5 teams in spend the last decade are avaraging less than .400% in wins.
Teams who do well in free agency draft well, resign their own and cherry pick good values.
Talent matters a heck of a lot but in this era of football after QB it is almost always about price per pound.
What are you getting for said player at said price.
Seattle didn't accidently win all those games with huge bargains for Russell and a couple DL. Once they paid them it's been tougher.
See Kaep in SF. Same deal. Lots of guys who are average making peanuts and amazingly you can compete with anyone.
Because you then have money to add average to above average players to fill holes and you can resign your own continuing their development and getting them for their peak years.
Dallas entered free agncy with a bottom 5 spend. They "could" have made moves and improved to about middle of the pack but they were never toucvhign the cash available to Jax, Oak, NYG and some of these teams who went for it.
They have been very calm and effective thus far.
Even stealing Hanna back before he could head to San Diego. --and quietly he was a huge need as blocking TE is key for this offense.
We got the 1T upgrade it never seemed Rod would allow and we've lost next to nothing of meaning yet.
Free agency isn't close to over. This was just round 1 when the players are at their shiniest and priciest.
I think all of us are disappointed in how this team is shaping up. I am not being negative (I read the warning sticky), I am just saying that this team has a lot of holes and that so far not very many of those holes have been addressed and you cant fill everything with the draft.
Pass rush is the main problem as of right now, if you assume Romo plays all 16 games. If Romo goes down, the plan appears to be Kellan Moore to fill in. I highly disagree with this move and I predict we will be in the same situation as last year, we will lose virtually every game Romo does not play. However, for the sake of argument, lets say Romo makes it through 16 games. The pass rush is laughable at this point, we have no Hardy and Gregory is suspended for 4 games. Our only pass rushing threat right now is DLaw and that is it.
We are basically forced to take Bosa at pick 4 now, I just don't see how we can go into the season with what we have at DE and there are really no good options in free agency left at DE.
8-8 is way better than 4-12, so he's right. Unfortunately, i can't see us doing better because the front office (and many fans) completely overrate the talent every year.
My problem with your problem is this: (lol)
You weren't going to fix the pass rush in free agency.
The best pass rusher available was our own guy. Hardy. And he is the best BY FAR.
The best young talent was Vernon... he of less sacks last year than DLaw. He had less than 1 sacks every 2 games but got paid like a Pro Bowler.
Mario Williams graded out worse on tape than people realize but he was a bnig name so there were cries for him.
And you weren't going to fix CB.
The top CB and pass rushers were franchised. These were guys worth big deals who could have been lead horses.
The available players were and are not that good.
No CB who is better than Orlando Scandrick was available.
So we were once again going to be paying CB1 money for CB2.
And the team wisely did not. They looked for cheaper options and resigned a guy whose got lots of knocks but plenty of upside.
Janoris Jenkins is more reliable than Mo to be sure, but he's probably not a "better" CB on any given play.
STL chose to let him leave. He was a good CB2, much like Brandon Carr that can help but got overpaid mightily.
You don't win in free agency by hitting home runs. The top 5 teams in spend the last decade are avaraging less than .400% in wins.
Teams who do well in free agency draft well, resign their own and cherry pick good values.
Talent matters a heck of a lot but in this era of football after QB it is almost always about price per pound.
What are you getting for said player at said price.
Seattle didn't accidently win all those games with huge bargains for Russell and a couple DL. Once they paid them it's been tougher.
See Kaep in SF. Same deal. Lots of guys who are average making peanuts and amazingly you can compete with anyone.
Because you then have money to add average to above average players to fill holes and you can resign your own continuing their development and getting them for their peak years.
Dallas entered free agncy with a bottom 5 spend. They "could" have made moves and improved to about middle of the pack but they were never toucvhign the cash available to Jax, Oak, NYG and some of these teams who went for it.
They have been very calm and effective thus far.
Even stealing Hanna back before he could head to San Diego. --and quietly he was a huge need as blocking TE is key for this offense.
We got the 1T upgrade it never seemed Rod would allow and we've lost next to nothing of meaning yet.
Free agency isn't close to over. This was just round 1 when the players are at their shiniest and priciest.
Welcome to same time as last year...we don't make the panic jerk moves that most fans want, they panic. By the time the draft ended, going into TC, all looked very well, with the exception of who would emerge as the top RB.
It took a while, after the Randle experiment, but DMC came out pretty decent. It's just other major derailments happened. We know what those were.
Well, Carr doesn't have leverage at all. The Cowboys do. Don't think they will bow down to pay Carr. Last year it was not cost effective to release Carr. This year it is. There are options at CB still.
I do not look at the 4-12 record and say we will suck, it is basically the same team as the 12-4 season, but with better players from last years draft. That will be improved more with this years draft.
DE seems to be the biggest issue right now, but it's not over yet. Panic, no not time for that. Not even close. Would we all feel better if it was addressed, yes. However given the history of most posters, No matter who is brought in, or signed, there will be a lot of whining and negativity toward the player and the FO....get ready for it...LOL....
You keep giving us the example of last year as if that was a great success lol
What was the record last year?
Pats are a very well run franchise, for the most part their personnel moves are spot on and more often than not improve the team. Cowboys are the Anti-PatsYeah, I love what the Pats have done. Bennett with Gronk and Brady could be scary.
We'd all like to see more in free agency. But let's see what the roster looks like come mid-August.
Lavishing in free agency is almost never a recipe for success. The Thornton pick-up was probably more important than we currently realize, and retaining our own was really important.
It comes down to a collar bone and a good draft anyways.
We'd all like to see more in free agency. But let's see what the roster looks like come mid-August.
Lavishing in free agency is almost never a recipe for success. The Thornton pick-up was probably more important than we currently realize, and retaining our own was really important.
It comes down to a collar bone and a good draft anyways.
Here's my issue.
The goal of any offseason is to try and improve. And you can do that between FA and the draft. The Thornton signing solves an issue for sure. So that was a nice signing.
But are you really going to be happy with having basically the exact same secondary as last year with maybe a 3rd round DB thrown in there somewhere and hoping Scandrick is healthy? I wouldn't be.
Chris Long would be a nice depth move but who is the pass rusher on this team. Who improves that pass rush? A mid to later round DE isn't going to do that.
This isn't a post to suggest we should have thrown cash around like crazy in FA but it is slightly bizarre that this front office seems to think what we had last year was pretty damn good and there is no reason to try to fix some areas other than thinking they'll kill the draft.
That's probably the same way our front office looks at it thinking this team is SB contender if Romo just stays healthy.
I tend to think that's a poor outlook but whatever..............