Free and the coaches film

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
Jay Novacek was Troy's security blanket. For a while Billy joe Dupree was Rogers.

Dallas Clark was Peyton Mannings. A lot of top TE's end up being the security blanket for top QBs.


Now sometimes you can go too often to the well there. And that is where the QB coach and the OC need to step in.
 

AMERICAS_FAN

Active Member
Messages
7,198
Reaction score
0
jobberone;5052218 said:
This is a great topic. You don't have to apologize about introducing a related topic. Thread drift is not a problem as long as its useful and somewhat related. And I hope I haven't made some feel like they have to walk on eggshells either.

I have noticed them going big on the strong side a fair amount this year. Particularly with the Wash game. It seems they go more this route rather than use two backs or a back and an H Back for protection. I have not looked at stats for this and wouldn't know where to begin finding that so it's an educated guess. They'll stick another fat body over there beside Free and put Witten or Phillips in line with them. Sometime Witten blocks and others he chips or just releases into pattern. They don't always put people out there to help Free though. Even the TB game he was mostly isolated. Even though Free looked poor at times blocking the DE it didn't disrupt the play often. When Tony is being pressured too much then Garrett seems to go quick patterns and max protection which shouldn't surprise. Sometimes that's two TEs and the other various combos vs the extra lineman. When Witten lines up beside Free alone he doesn't stay in a lot but I have no figures just a general impression (and the number of receptions by Witten). When Witten is matched up on a DE he has his share of problems. And often enough Free is looking in to help the OG which I understand but Witten doesn't appear to be that dependable blocking wise with many DEs.

The Wash game was different than the other games in general. They were doing a lot of stunting and most of the jailbreaks were up the middle. Wash was committed to making Tony throw quickly and getting pressure. They used Free to help inside a lot from those big strong formations and used another lineman who lined up outside Free to handle the outside pressure or redirect stunts inside. Witten at times stayed in and blocked as well.

Before I did this I was certain Dallas needed to address tackle. I had no confidence in Free at all and little for Parnell. I'm still concerned but not nearly as before. I think the experts have it right in that the interior must be addressed first. I'm not prepared to comment on who needs to be replaced as I just didn't concentrate on individual players in the interior. I have been watching that more the last couple of games I watched. If I was forced to make an off the cuff remark about the interior last year AC (after Costa) then I don't like any of them.

Now before anyone jumps on this as a measure of confidence in Free then hold off. I haven't finished watching all the games number one and I'm not going to endorse Free period. I'll just say thru the last game I watched the tackles are not as big a problem as the rest.

Here are Free's numbers. MichaelWinicki put some up and these may be basically the same but hopefully the format will help to reinforce his stats.

Regular Season Stats

Career Offensive Line Stats
Year Team G GS Pen Yds False Start Holding Sacks Allwd Yds
2007 Dal 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
2009 Dal 16 7 4 30 2 2 1.00 5.00
2010 Dal 16 16 9 55 7 1 5.00 26.00
2011 Dal 16 16 10 75 5 5 9.50 78.50
2012 Dal 16 16 13 90 8 5 7.00 54.50
Totals 65 55 36 250 22 13 22.50 164.00

Here are Jason Peters considered a good tackle:

Regular Season Stats

Career Offensive Line Stats
Year Team G GS Pen Yds False Start Holding Sacks Allwd Yds
2004 Buf 5 1 2 15 0 1 0.00 0.00
2005 Buf 16 10 3 20 2 1 1.50 11.50
2006 Buf 16 16 6 31 5 0 2.00 16.00
2007 Buf 15 15 6 35 5 1 6.00 41.00
2008 Buf 13 13 8 55 4 2 11.50 106.50
2009 Phi 15 15 9 68 6 1 6.00 66.00
2010 Phi 13 13 7 50 3 3 2.00 14.50
2011 Phi 14 14 6 35 5 0 2.50 10.50
Totals 107 97 47 309 30 9 31.50 266.00

Here is Trent Williams:
Regular Season Stats

Career Offensive Line Stats
Year Team G GS Pen Yds False Start Holding Sacks Allwd Yds
2010 Was 14 13 6 45 3 3 11.50 100.50
2011 Was 10 10 7 65 2 4 3.00 33.50
2012 Was 16 16 6 40 4 2 5.50 43.00
Totals 40 39 19 150 9 9 20.00 177.00

I don't have the pressure stats and I'm a little cautious about where and who these come from. They aren't always easy to assign. Same thing for sacks although less so. You really have to see the entire play to get a feel for who mucked up what. And then you sometimes can't tell. I will say a general trend in the wrong direction is cause for concern and that's what you have with Free. And by eyeball he is not playing as well the last two years as he did in 2010. So there is some truth lying within the stats IMO.

Last year Dallas was 11th in the league in adjusted sack rate at 5.8% with 36 sacks given up. Interestingly runs off RT were almost a 1/2 yd less. I'm not certain what to make of those stats. My impression is the OL is worse than #11 and Tony makes them look better by escaping pressure so much. That's subjective but seems to be more the consensus than not.

Now to answer your main question. Sorry, I don't know. Nothing seems to stop Witten and I think Tony looks at him too often at times. OTOH, sometimes that's all that is there. I'll try to look at Witten and Free together and get back to you but it'll have to be from here forward for now.

Excellent question.

Thanks, that was great analysis and insight. The stats you mentioned seemed to indicate problems with the running game blocks. That's when Witten has to stay in to block. And if the running game is not working then the next best alternative is to dump off to the TE or backs. This may be why it appears he is going too much to the TE when really he has no choice to do it because he needs to make up for a poor running game.

This inability to run still falls on the OL. When I look at Free I see a player who is ok more times than not blocking for the pass but really below average
Blocking the run. I thin this is where the imbalance of the OL comes in because interior players - who seem to be the opposit of Free - in that they are okay
 

dogberry

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,010
Reaction score
773
I think the offensive line is the biggest problem on the team. Free is part of that group. I would draft nothing but offensive linemen. That's not happening.

As far as this thread ending, Job has a least two more games to review.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
AMERICAS_FAN;5052362 said:
Thanks, that was great analysis and insight. The stats you mentioned seemed to indicate problems with the running game blocks. That's when Witten has to stay in to block. And if the running game is not working then the next best alternative is to dump off to the TE or backs. This may be why it appears he is going too much to the TE when really he has no choice to do it because he needs to make up for a poor running game.

This inability to run still falls on the OL. When I look at Free I see a player who is ok more times than not blocking for the pass but really below average
Blocking the run. I thin this is where the imbalance of the OL comes in because interior players - who seem to be the opposit of Free - in that they are okay

Our avg adjusted running play is about 3.75 yds which is about 1/2 yard off the league avg. That goes well with my impression of our run game being less than avg. For some reason we stat out better in power runs but I don't think that stat tells the truth. We just don't move people off the ball in short runs and that's the entire line not just a player or two. The left side is noticeably better than the right side but still not dependable IMO.

Even though we stat out well in passing I think our line is avg at best. It's hard to argue with all the passing yards and ranking but I don't think they tell the story well. I wouldn't be surprised that Tony doesn't avoid ten plus sacks a year. Maybe more.
 

mschmidt64

Active Member
Messages
748
Reaction score
132
FuzzyLumpkins;5051826 said:
He is not saying that your opinion is invalid.

I am saying his opinion is invalid. We're not talking about flavors of ice cream, we're talking something that is definitely measurable.

Free sucked in 2012.

That's all there is to it.

He was not average by any measurement.

You have done really nothing to contribute to the discussion of how Free actually performed. What you have done is repeatedly stated that you think that Free played awful in the TB game, that everyone should be able to see it and if people have been unable to see it then they are stupid or have an agenda.

I could go on about how ' supporting your position with posturing and invoking the bandwagon posits nothing but all jobber has done is acknowledged the difference to that opinion and said that you simply disagree. He then recommends to agree to disagree but you won't have any of that.

Just more nag nag nag nag nag nag nag and you don't even talk about the actual play you talk gross generalities. you could save a lot of time by writing 'Free is awful' in your sig. maybe contributing points as to why he sucks might help.

xwalker doesn't need your help and being the yappy dog that contributes nothing new beyond what x has already contributed is going to have you see an outcome you are not going to like very much.

I'm not going to contribute any more than this to the discussion. It would be like me saying Quincy Carter was an average QB in 2002; patently ridiculous and proveably false and calling it "my opinion" shouldn't insulate me from people correctly saying I'm dead wrong.

It's beneath me to dignify it with anything more than the stats that have already definitely proven that Free sucked in 2012.

Plus everyone saw with their own eyes that Free sucked too, including the Cowboys, who benched him.

Not a topic worth discussing the merits of. What is worth discussing is the biases or credibility of the grader, maybe.
 

mschmidt64

Active Member
Messages
748
Reaction score
132
jobberone;5051904 said:
Let's address the main issue first. This board is here for the members to discuss the Dallas Cowboys primarily. There has to be room for debate and differing opinions are inevitable, informative and encouraged. So there is no 'silencing' on this site.

Well, that's not true.

But I'll agree you are not attempting to silence me if you agree I'm not attempting to berate you.

I'm attempting to tell you that you are wrong. Which you are.

My objection to some of your posts is you have repeatedly said the same thing over and over and some have been bashing. I have defended my stance on the gifs and the TB game as well as overall. Obviously we are never going to agree on this. It serves no purpose for you to continuously call me out on this when you've made your objections known and we've addressed it.

That's nice.

As long as you continue to post a completely unsubtantiated opinion of Free being "average" based on nothing more than your own personal game observations, I will continue to tell you that you are wrong.

At least, for as long as I care to be involved in the thread. Which may not be that much longer.

Now, if you want to point to some new and real evidence for us to discuss then that's an opportunity for everyone to share in a debate. That does not mean saying what you've said in a new way but bring up some actual data to discuss say like Winicki did.

Why does there need to be any new evidence? Free was, as Winicki pointed out, one of the worst tackles in football last year.

There is nothing you can say that makes that untrue.

That's what makes your observations so incorrect. They aren't worth respecting any more than me saying Quincy Carter was an average QB in 2002. I can keep saying it but I would deserve to be told I'm wrong. In fact, I would think I'd be appreciative of the person pointing it out to me, because I wouldn't want to be that ignorant of football.

Your detailing of the good and bad could be very informative and I support you doing it. But your conclusions that he was average are based on nothing.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
mschmidt64;5052801 said:
Well, that's not true.

But I'll agree you are not attempting to silence me if you agree I'm not attempting to berate you.

I'm attempting to tell you that you are wrong. Which you are.

That's nice.

As long as you continue to post a completely unsubtantiated opinion of Free being "average" based on nothing more than your own personal game observations, I will continue to tell you that you are wrong.

At least, for as long as I care to be involved in the thread. Which may not be that much longer.

Why does there need to be any new evidence? Free was, as Winicki pointed out, one of the worst tackles in football last year.

There is nothing you can say that makes that untrue.

That's what makes your observations so incorrect. They aren't worth respecting any more than me saying Quincy Carter was an average QB in 2002. I can keep saying it but I would deserve to be told I'm wrong. In fact, I would think I'd be appreciative of the person pointing it out to me, because I wouldn't want to be that ignorant of football.

Your detailing of the good and bad could be very informative and I support you doing it. But your conclusions that he was average are based on nothing.

You know, it's possible to both be right and be behaving like a bit of a jerk at the same time. I think you're getting some pushback because you're nearing that territory. If you think he's nuts, there's little reason to engage. If you think his point should be debated, then debate it. But just saying he's wrong and that you won't bother to dignify the 'why' with a supporting argument doesn't get you very far. At least, it doesn't further the discussion in the thread.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
mschmidt64;5052801 said:
Well, that's not true.

But I'll agree you are not attempting to silence me if you agree I'm not attempting to berate you.

I'm attempting to tell you that you are wrong. Which you are.



That's nice.

As long as you continue to post a completely unsubtantiated opinion of Free being "average" based on nothing more than your own personal game observations, I will continue to tell you that you are wrong.

At least, for as long as I care to be involved in the thread. Which may not be that much longer.



Why does there need to be any new evidence? Free was, as Winicki pointed out, one of the worst tackles in football last year.

There is nothing you can say that makes that untrue.

That's what makes your observations so incorrect. They aren't worth respecting any more than me saying Quincy Carter was an average QB in 2002. I can keep saying it but I would deserve to be told I'm wrong. In fact, I would think I'd be appreciative of the person pointing it out to me, because I wouldn't want to be that ignorant of football.

Your detailing of the good and bad could be very informative and I support you doing it. But your conclusions that he was average are based on nothing.

Free gave up 7 sacks last year which is roughly what an avg OT gave up last year. Our adjusted sack rate for 36 sacks given up was 5.6% which was good for 11th in the league. Smith allowed three sacks and pressure on 6.0% of his snaps in pass protection, Free yielded seven sacks and a 6.2% pressure rate, and Parnell in 267 snaps allowed five sacks. Parnell yielded pressure on 4.2 percent of his pass snaps which is not great but the best on the team. I saw where MW said Free gave up 41 pressures but that's more than the adjusted rate as well as more than I subjectively have seen which just proves how difficult it is for multiple sources to grade pressures; they're just hard to assess well especially with as many jailbreaks as we have and Tony running in circles behind the LOS.

I don't believe you have looked at the all 22 at all. Otherwise you wouldn't be making some of the comments you're making. Additionally, if you had seen all the games' coaches film then you'd be standing on your head about the interior of the line which is far worse than either tackle which are roughly the same despite all the fan and media noise to the contrary. Yeah, Smith gave up less sacks but about the same pressure. Furthermore, you haven't looked at the stats for last year or you wouldn't be saying Free sucks when he obviously doesn't stat wise which is far more accurate than your subjective insistence to the contrary and no other data to back up your claim.

Also, you keep saying I think Free is average and while I've stated he looked average in a few games, good in others and poor in some, I have yet to give my final assessment of Free. And you're not the only one who has jumped to that conclusion as well as stating I'm biased, defending Free, giving him passes for poor play, yada.

I've stated my subjective opinion as well as backed it up with stats from reputable sources like Pro-Football-reference, Football Outsiders etc.

All you've done is point at some gifs that I've repeatedly told you aren't completely fair in assessing the player and appear not to have seen those entire plays or game period for that matter, pointed out what another member has stated (over and over), repeatedly told me I'm wrong to put it in polite terms, and jumped up and down saying you are right, right, right and anyone that thinks otherwise is suspect (to be polite again). And you're giving me nor anyone else any objective data to back that up.

So unless you want to POINT out some plays over the entire season and give me the counter times so I can find them to discuss them with you, some other stats that aren't outfliers that significantly differ from mine, or some other evidence that backs your POV up and detracts from mine then stop annoying me and worse boring the hell out of me with your posts.

What we have here in a lot of those vocal here and in the media is piling on and a perpetuation of a story line which is Free sucks and we must do something about it. And many have jumped on board. Having seen perpetuation of myth on many topics related to medicine I understand how hard it is to avoid that temptation and how difficult is can be to ferret it out yourself. Since the stats didn't match the observations I decided I'd have a look. To date things aren't nearly as bad as I thought and heard (and continue to hear) but things aren't peachy keen by any means. And as far as doing something about it, I've repeatedly said we should address OT this year.

And to another who said substituting Parnell and rotating left one conclusion of what they thought of Free; why that's not necessarily true. Part of it was Free certainly wasn't a beacon of stability but I think they are at the point with Parnell they have to play him some to get an idea of what they have. He played for Smith some as well. And he looks like he may be able to do the job there. In fact he may become the best tackle period on the team.

Every single OL on the team has sucked some this last year and a little of that is just football for the vast majority of linemen who've ever played if your name is not Wright, Slater, Munoz yada. And some is because we just don't have a very good OL and that includes everyone. It's not the worse but it's a far cry from being good and the stats back that up. It was average to better in pass protection and less than average to ?worse whatever you call that in the run game. And if you watch the games I can promise you we don't have a domineering offensive lineman on the team and Parnell may the best we have right now. I don't care where they run. If we don't run draws, misdirection plays, counters, traps, and have the backs run to whatever daylight they can find including reversing field then we don't have consistent holes to run thru.

I still have three more games then you'll all be rid of me. So take some solace in that. Peace.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
jobberone;5052943 said:
Free gave up 7 sacks last year which is roughly what an avg OT gave up last year. Our adjusted sack rate for 36 sacks given up was 5.6% which was good for 11th in the league. Smith allowed three sacks and pressure on 6.0% of his snaps in pass protection, Free yielded seven sacks and a 6.2% pressure rate, and Parnell in 267 snaps allowed five sacks. Parnell yielded pressure on 4.2 percent of his pass snaps which is not great but the best on the team. I saw where MW said Free gave up 41 pressures but that's more than the adjusted rate as well as more than I subjectively have seen which just proves how difficult it is for multiple sources to grade pressures; they're just hard to assess well especially with as many jailbreaks as we have and Tony running in circles behind the LOS.

I don't believe you have looked at the all 22 at all. Otherwise you wouldn't be making some of the comments you're making. Additionally, if you had seen all the games' coaches film then you'd be standing on your head about the interior of the line which is far worse than either tackle which are roughly the same despite all the fan and media noise to the contrary. Yeah, Smith gave up less sacks but about the same pressure. Furthermore, you haven't looked at the stats for last year or you wouldn't be saying Free sucks when he obviously doesn't stat wise which is far more accurate than your subjective insistence to the contrary and no other data to back up your claim.

Also, you keep saying I think Free is average and while I've stated he looked average in a few games, good in others and poor in some, I have yet to give my final assessment of Free. And you're not the only one who has jumped to that conclusion as well as stating I'm biased, defending Free, giving him passes for poor play, yada.

I've stated my subjective opinion as well as backed it up with stats from reputable sources like Pro-Football-reference, Football Outsiders etc.

All you've done is point at some gifs that I've repeatedly told you aren't completely fair in assessing the player and appear not to have seen those entire plays or game period for that matter, pointed out what another member has stated (over and over), repeatedly told me I'm wrong to put it in polite terms, and jumped up and down saying you are right, right, right and anyone that thinks otherwise is suspect (to be polite again). And you're giving me nor anyone else any objective data to back that up.

So unless you want to POINT out some plays over the entire season and give me the counter times so I can find them to discuss them with you, some other stats that aren't outfliers that significantly differ from mine, or some other evidence that backs your POV up and detracts from mine then stop annoying me and worse boring the hell out of me with your posts.

What we have here in a lot of those vocal here and in the media is piling on and a perpetuation of a story line which is Free sucks and we must do something about it. And many have jumped on board. Having seen perpetuation of myth on many topics related to medicine I understand how hard it is to avoid that temptation and how difficult is can be to ferret it out yourself. Since the stats didn't match the observations I decided I'd have a look. To date things aren't nearly as bad as I thought and heard (and continue to hear) but things aren't peachy keen by any means. And as far as doing something about it, I've repeatedly said we should address OT this year.

And to another who said substituting Parnell and rotating left one conclusion of what they thought of Free; why that's not necessarily true. Part of it was Free certainly wasn't a beacon of stability but I think they are at the point with Parnell they have to play him some to get an idea of what they have. He played for Smith some as well. And he looks like he may be able to do the job there. In fact he may become the best tackle period on the team.

Every single OL on the team has sucked some this last year and a little of that is just football for the vast majority of linemen who've ever played if your name is not Wright, Slater, Munoz yada. And some is because we just don't have a very good OL and that includes everyone. It's not the worse but it's a far cry from being good and the stats back that up. It was average to better in pass protection and less than average to ?worse whatever you call that in the run game. And if you watch the games I can promise you we don't have a domineering offensive lineman on the team and Parnell may the best we have right now. I don't care where they run. If we don't run draws, misdirection plays, counters, traps, and have the backs run to whatever daylight they can find including reversing field then we don't have consistent holes to run thru.

I still have three more games then you'll all be rid of me. So take some solace in that. Peace.

Holy crap.
 

tskyler

Active Member
Messages
218
Reaction score
28
I just want to say:

I really appreciate the series!

Please, don't keep wasting your time engaging in the "your grading system is wrong" debate. Some people feel a need to engage in this type of discussion and have their opinion validated. Some people don't. It's a matter of taste. Obviously, you don't so please feel free to ignore. There are so many threads that a) argue opinion or shoot from the hip about the simple things most of us pick up on tv b) discuss simple stats or c) discuss lists of drafts, free agents, or other seasonal topics.

Actual analysis like this is rare because its time consuming. I just wanted to let you know that I for one have found it helpful. My memory of Free's play was foggy. Sure, it would be great if we had a running commentary on each play by NFL line coaches with a grade. Even better if it correlated with official pressure statistics.

But, your impressions as subjective as they may be, have to me, been described in clear enough language that they have been useful for me to form a better picture of what happened last year.

Looking forward to the completion of the series. Wish there were more threads like this.

Sky
 

AMERICAS_FAN

Active Member
Messages
7,198
Reaction score
0
jobberone;5052699 said:
Our avg adjusted running play is about 3.75 yds which is about 1/2 yard off the league avg. That goes well with my impression of our run game being less than avg. For some reason we stat out better in power runs but I don't think that stat tells the truth. We just don't move people off the ball in short runs and that's the entire line not just a player or two. The left side is noticeably better than the right side but still not dependable IMO.

Even though we stat out well in passing I think our line is avg at best. It's hard to argue with all the passing yards and ranking but I don't think they tell the story well. I wouldn't be surprised that Tony doesn't avoid ten plus sacks a year. Maybe more.

The bolded part above makes me wonder if the ultimate problem is with the zone blocking scheme.

The last time Doug Free had a great season was his contract year that earned him the big contract that he’s playing under today. In that year he played RT under a man-blocking power running scheme. Currently Free is playing under a zone blocking scheme where he struggles with last year at RT and LT the year before.

I often wonder if his woe’s at RT last year -- and the entire OL in short yardage situations -- have more to do with the current zone blocking scheme not matching the player’s skills than those skills themselves being in decline.
 

mschmidt64

Active Member
Messages
748
Reaction score
132
jobberone;5052943 said:
I saw where MW said Free gave up 41 pressures but that's more than the adjusted rate as well as more than I subjectively have seen

Yeah, that's kinda my point.

Also, you keep saying I think Free is average and while I've stated he looked average in a few games, good in others and poor in some, I have yet to give my final assessment of Free.

Well, if you're final assessment is that he sucked last year, then you're on the right page.

But quickly perusing most of your grades, you never even say he had a bad day until, like, the Cleveland game.

When everyone knows he had many poor games long the way, including Tampa in which you say he was average ("C" grade) when he was very clearly terrible in that game. His pressure rate was what, like 15%? Come on.

And you're not the only one who has jumped to that conclusion as well as stating I'm biased, defending Free, giving him passes for poor play, yada.

Well it's hard not to come to that conclusion when you look at him versus Tampa and give that performance a "C." If you are looking at that performance and thinking "Oh, that's not too bad, that's average," then it's no surprise that you aren't seeing the 41 pressures assigned to him or that you are not assigning him some of the errors that were his.

Tampa was the worst game I remember seeing from him but he wasn't a ton better in a lot of other games.

And this is just taking into account passing. He was not a good run blocker either.

I've stated my subjective opinion as well as backed it up with stats from reputable sources like Pro-Football-reference, Football Outsiders etc.

I notice Winicki posted the grades from PFF and they were bad.

All you've done is point at some gifs that I've repeatedly told you aren't completely fair in assessing the player

And I've repeatedly told you they are fair in assessing the player. Your defense to why they aren't fair, as far as I've seen, is that you say they were only a handful of plays. Which is definitely excuse-making.

Yeah, and a handful of bad plays by a QB who throws 4 INTs lands that QB on the bench too.

Free making 6 bad plays in one game in pass protection (and there might be more, that's just the GIFs that were actually posted) is atrocious. It's not cherry picking, it's visual evidence that Free had a horrific afternoon.

And you're giving me nor anyone else any objective data to back that up.

You don't have any objective data to back up what you are saying. Your stats show he let up a ton more pressures, and then you excuse that by saying "Well I didn't see it when I watched him."

Well you must be missing something then.

I don't care about his actual numbers of sacks given up. Romo's ability to avoid them decreases those numbers artificially. It doesn't make Free's performance better.

So unless you want to POINT out some plays over the entire season and give me the counter times so I can find them to discuss them with you, some other stats that aren't outfliers that significantly differ from mine, or some other evidence that backs your POV up and detracts from mine then stop annoying me and worse boring the hell out of me with your posts.

I am not going to go back and watch every game and pick out the plays that Free screwed up on.

I am merely pointing out that he was bad, the grades reflect it, and if you aren't seeing that in your viewings, you are missing something.

What we have here in a lot of those vocal here and in the media is piling on and a perpetuation of a story line which is Free sucks and we must do something about it. And many have jumped on board. Having seen perpetuation of myth on many topics related to medicine I understand how hard it is to avoid that temptation and how difficult is can be to ferret it out yourself. Since the stats didn't match the observations I decided I'd have a look. To date things aren't nearly as bad as I thought and heard (and continue to hear) but things aren't peachy keen by any means.

Yeah, here's the admission. You went into this activity with the goal of finding a conclusion that disproved the media narrative. I think you overshot.

And as far as doing something about it, I've repeatedly said we should address OT this year.

If you had a 29 year old OT who was average, it wouldn't be a priority to address. Free is not average, he was horrible, and he needs to be replaced.

Part of it was Free certainly wasn't a beacon of stability

Yeah. Part of Free's benching was that he sucked. Agreed.

Every single OL on the team has sucked some this last year

No doubt. We had probably the worst OL in football this past year, and Free was a big reason for that, along with Bernadeau and the revolving door at center. If it was not the worst, it was one of the worst 3 or 4. Definitely the worst in run blocking. Maybe a little better in pass protection, statistically saved because of Romo's ability to evade pressure. And even with that ability, Free's numbered pressures were abysmal.
 

mschmidt64

Active Member
Messages
748
Reaction score
132
Here's the stats again, thanks Winicki.

-------------------------------------------------

First here are Free's key numbers for 2012:

15 penalties/6 sacks/4 QB hits/41 pressures

For the very good tackle I've chosen Andre Smith, and here are his key numbers for 2012:

4 penalties/7 sacks/2 QB hits/24 pressures

For the good tackle I've chosen Sebastian Vollmer, and here are his key numbers for 2012:

5 penalties/6 sacks/7 QB hits/22 pressures

For the average tackle I've chosen Demar Dotson, and here are his key numbers for 2012:

10 penalties/7 sacks/8 QB hits/26 pressures


-----------------------------------------------------------

Free was bad. He was bad when you look at the stats. He was bad when you watch the games. He was benched because he was bad. He was worse when you consider he has probably the best QB in the game at avoiding pressure, sacks and hits.

Once again, anyone coming to a different conclusion is missing something.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
AMERICAS_FAN;5053034 said:
The bolded part above makes me wonder if the ultimate problem is with the zone blocking scheme.

The last time Doug Free had a great season was his contract year that earned him the big contract that he’s playing under today. In that year he played RT under a man-blocking power running scheme. Currently Free is playing under a zone blocking scheme where he struggles with last year at RT and LT the year before.

I often wonder if his woe’s at RT last year -- and the entire OL in short yardage situations -- have more to do with the current zone blocking scheme not matching the player’s skills than those skills themselves being in decline.

Actually, I've wondered the same. But we don't zone block all the time. We mix it up. Without actually going thru the film and analyzing each player then noting when they zone blocked and associating that with down, distance, opponent, yada then I'm not sure what you'd have when you'd be thru. That's so far above my head I wouldn't do it even if I had the time. But I'd be surprised if the Boys don't break that stuff down including what their opponents do then come up with a game plan each week. If you have some thoughts here I'd love to hear them.

Here are the adjusted run stats for Dallas last year:

Rk 22th, adj line yds 3.92 per, RB 3.78 per, adj power success rate 63%, power rank 15, stuffed rate 19%, stuffed rk 12, 2nd level yds 1.04, 2nd level rk 25, open field yds 0.52, open field rk 26. I'm sorry I can't get this to come out formatted to do a small chart.

So despite my subjective view we don't do well in short yardage situations the stats say we're avg. I guess I'm a little off in my subjective opinion but I don't really want to be average. I don't know what our stats are say for 3rd or 4th and 1 on the one. Or what it is on 3rd or 4th and one or less between the 20s. If someone could ferret that out I'd like to see it.

However, we are in the bottom third running overall which I think most here would agree with. The stuffed rate is just a little better than the league avg of 20%. 2nd level yds are nearly league avg but open field yds are a good bit below the league avg of 0.72. Some of this says we just don't run as much as other teams which some may find interesting. Some says we don't break enough runs. If you look at the game and try to match the stats with that you'll see some of the bigger runs coming off busted plays rather than RBs having big holes, breaking tackles or juking the Ds jocks off. We just don't have many days like Murray had against the Rams awhile back or even 130-180 yds combined days. I don't know what to think of that as some will argue you can get more yds throwing the ball (for which I don't have a great argument against). OTOH, you need to run the ball well at times and you have to be balanced. I also bemoan our lack of play action but maybe I'm archaic there. But I don't want to start another argument here. That puppy needs its own thread.

So I don't have a great response to your question. I'd like to know what others think though.

As to your other statement, I agree it can be unproductive to go tit for tat with argumentative posters. However, my response to him was also directed at all those posters who foster that kind of response to these kinds of threads. I was hoping in some small part my responses would foster less of those posts and more of the ones like yours and others in this thread. I hope that's not too arrogant on my part.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,709
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
AMERICAS_FAN;5053034 said:
The bolded part above makes me wonder if the ultimate problem is with the zone blocking scheme.

The last time Doug Free had a great season was his contract year that earned him the big contract that he’s playing under today. In that year he played RT under a man-blocking power running scheme. Currently Free is playing under a zone blocking scheme where he struggles with last year at RT and LT the year before.

I often wonder if his woe’s at RT last year -- and the entire OL in short yardage situations -- have more to do with the current zone blocking scheme not matching the player’s skills than those skills themselves being in decline.
ZBS is primarily a run blocking scheme. It had no affect on the pass-plays that you can see in the Gifs in this thread.
 

Reality

Staff member
Messages
31,232
Reaction score
72,775
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
One thing I have noticed over the years is that, at least with the Cowboys, certain pairings of offensive guards and tackles do better when they are next to each other than other combinations. Kosier in particular seemed to elevate the play of the tackles next to him.

The problem Free has is that his game is built completely around technique and skill. There are several offensive tackles in the league that have less skills, but their weight, arm reach and body mass in general make them a harder obstacle to get around. That is exactly why some tackles can play effectively well into their 30s.

Free does not have that and because of it, he has to use proper technique every single play and if he doesn't or the defensive player breaks his rhythm and gets him on his heals, he gets owned. Free uses good technique on many plays which is why he looks good quite often, but when he gets beat, he gets beat badly which leads to penalties or quarterback pressures/sacks.

I don't think Free is as bad as some fans think, but I prefer body mass and long arms over technique for offensive lineman.

/reality
 
Top