Sydla
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 61,724
- Reaction score
- 95,232
I can only explain what the study says. You lament ideologues but right now there are people running around claiming this study proves vaccines are bad, they cause massive problems, etc. And many of those claiming higher incident rates were talking about rampant side effects.it's not nuanced. people were shouting that higher incidents were fake news and unequivocally DID NOT happen. Those that thought it did were "conspiracy theorists" and asking the question was not worth even addressing as serious humans, because derp science of a 99% effective vaccine that "made you immune" from getting covid, that was redefined to "well you can get covid if you have the vaccine, but not bad covid" ......... etc, etc.
the study shows that if you never got covid and got the vaccine, there is an increase. that scenario is the science you now must accept.
I didn't mention the study said anything about young athletes. but it did not refute it either. you seem to be of the camp that science is NOT about asking questions but "obey the initial assertion from for profit drug manufacturers and governments"
I'm vaccinated not boosted, so I am not a ideologue. but the one side that shuts every thing and questiondown and then has to incrementally move the goalposts is definitely the side I'm watching versus the "make your own call" side.
the fact Novak Djokovic, elite athlete in an isolated outdoor sport, was banned from the US Open while refugees, immigrants and illegals were never sent back based on vaccine status shows how unserious a country and debate this is
and just so you are clear this isn't a immigration rant and move the goal posts, it is not. it is about numbers (1 vs 1000s) and consistency of applying the law based on "science"
This study, in no way, shape or form, states that or supports that if you actually read the study. If anything, this study that they are touting actually still undermines them because the study is very clear that all these side effects are still extremely rare and that getting COVID increases the risk for these side effects more than getting the vaccine.
In a discussion about an increase in deaths in athletes and the cause, you plopped down this study, quoting me about no rise in athlete deaths, as if 1) the study would prove my claim wrong and 2) that I had somehow been arguing that vaccines had no side effects or even increased rates of side effects. If I misunderstood your intent here, then my apologies.
They study basically says they are seeing higher incidence rates that what was expected, that they still are extremely rare and that we should conduct more research into associations between certain vaccines and side effects (which I totally agree with - more research should be done).
Last edited: